Happydays2020 wrote: » Unless we want to have crappy pensions and greater poverty our demographics mean we will need a higher working population in 20 years so we will end up with a fa more multi cultural society. I think this is a great thing. We should embrace it. If we have anyone undocumented we should have a clear mechanism to regularise and then allow citizenship.
Happydays2020 wrote: » Unless we want to have crappy pensions and greater poverty our demographics mean we will need a higher working population in 20 years so we will end up with a fa more multi cultural society.
I think this is a great thing. We should embrace it. If we have anyone undocumented we should have a clear mechanism to regularise and then allow citizenship.
jmayo wrote: » And as someone else said why don't we make it easier for natives (i.e. Europeans) to have children than importing someone else to do it. .
[Deleted User] wrote: » Actually, why don't we advertise and provide funding for Irish people to return to Ireland? All those Irish who left during/after the banking crash, or later. (Funding to help them get established, find work etc) I always get the feeling the focus is on providing for foreigners to come to Ireland, as opposed to retaining the Irish already in Ireland, or to entice Irish people abroad to return.
I think this is a great thing. We should embrace it.
If we have anyone undocumented we should have a clear mechanism to regularise and then allow citizenship.
Deleted User wrote: » Actually, why don't we advertise and provide funding for Irish people to return to Ireland? All those Irish who left during/after the banking crash, or later. (Funding to help them get established, find work etc) I always get the feeling the focus is on providing for foreigners to come to Ireland, as opposed to retaining the Irish already in Ireland, or to entice Irish people abroad to return.
Swindled wrote: » It's utterly perverse. Thousands of our young Irish people are forced to emigrate every year due to no prospect of a decent job or their own house / family, and yet we think the great solution to all this is immigration from the third world, instead of sorting out and improving our own respective countries.
gw80 wrote: » I don't know about that klaz. Some people might not like the idea of rewarding the people who left the country when times got hard.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Seems a rather idiotic attitude TBH. Isn't it better that people leave, than stay on welfare, building personal debt, and likely losing their mortgage? Never mind, the money that came into Ireland from people working abroad, by helping the families they left behind. Those people who left, helped Ireland to recover since it lessened their burden to the State. And by encouraging them to return, you bring back skilled/educated labor who already share the common values and attitudes within Irish/western culture.
bubblypop wrote: » Do you see all the replies to you? All talk about low paid or unskilled migrants. Or illegal immigrants. Because that's what they automatically think when anyone mentions immigrants. In their heads, immigrants are a drain on our society. And they will try to justify that belief. Even though you didn't mention anything about that.
Salvation Tambourine wrote: » Reading that was really weird.
"Unfortunately" someone not legally allowed live in the state can't receive free money from the state. As if there's something fundamentally wrong with this outcome. It's absolutely bizarre.
gw80 wrote: » A lot of people also asked what is so great about a multicultural country, the poster has not come back with anything, maybe you could answer?
DeadHand wrote: » Don’t forget the food, lads. Though quite why the Irish nation had to be reduced to (at most) 80% of the population in its own homeland in order that Oisin could get a kebab hasn’t been fully explained yet.
Swindled wrote: » yep "multiculturalism" works so well, from taco chips . . to hijabs to increased social housing demand, how could we live without these multicultural enhancements.
Happydays2020 wrote: » Yep. Narrow minded is a nice way to put it.Immigrants will add value. They will not drain the economy. No one wants to come here to rely on social housing and the dole.
bubblypop wrote: » How very open minded of you.
Wibbs wrote: » Nobody is arguing against legal, skilled and economically viable and positive migration from within the EU, or indeed without it so long as the above criteria are met. What people are arguing about is the Accepted Truth that multiculturalism is some moral and societal requirement apparently only for White Western nations and the illegal, quasi legal, unskilled uneconomically viable and negative migrants.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » That is patently false if we are referring to this thread. Many posters have taken a total anti immigrant stance even including eu member states citizens. You might not take that view wibbs but it would be a lie to say nobody in this thread is. Which you just did.
Mike Murdock wrote: » Please show us some examples.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » As someone else advised me, go and read the thread. If you can't find any. I'll get them for you when I feel like it. I'm sitting on a train to go somewhere and enjoy myself I'm not trawling through boards great big racist thread for you Mikey. Sorry about that pal.
Wibbs wrote: » Vanishingly few have expressed such a stance. If "many posters" have surely it will be easy to give examples?