Bob24 wrote: » Not really, you brought up the criminal aspect and I was just replying to your post explaining the clear difference between the crypto situation and what you are referring to. All I am saying from the start is that a combination of regulatory guidelines and tax collection efforts implies some sort of acceptance. It is not just that governments are ramping up tax collection efforts, they are also clarifying and/or building a legal framework for those activities. If the plan was to ban them altogether, there would be no point in doing that.
Donald Trump wrote: » Tax recovery does not have to mean acceptance. And the regulation is just a way to facilitate tax recovery. A different situation and motive, but look at the example of CAB closer to home. They will often stick criminals with tax bills. It doesn't mean they accept the crime. It is often just a way of hitting them somehow when they can't prove the actual crime. The regulation effect would be in the mandatory reporting by financial institutions, and businesses, of cash transactions over a certain limit for example.Before anyone loses their shit, I'm not saying bitcoin is criminal. I am only saying that taxation does not always imply acceptance. It may well be being accepted. Just you can't say based off that alone.
Father Hernandez wrote: » "Are we excited yet?" This thread lately is certainly not getting me excited..
Donald Trump wrote: » You need to tell me the specific regulations because the concept of "regulation" on its own does not, without further specifics, mean that anything is being accepted and will be accepted in the future.
Bob24 wrote: » See one example amongst others for a legal and regulatory framework: https://adan.eu/en/article/french-regulatory-framework-markets-crypto-assets
Donald Trump wrote: » Thanks. I will have a read of that later.
HGVRHKYY wrote: » Anyone own Solana here? Planning on buying some when it's listed on CB Pro, hoping it doesn't rally too highly when it's listed or at least dips back down in the days after
SortingYouOut wrote: » It's already listed on Binance, will a listing on Coinbase really have that much of an impact or do you believe in the coin itself?
FileNotFound wrote: » When is it due to be listed on CB if you don't mind me asking?
cnocbui wrote: » You could collect stamps. If i had any dry powder, I'd be excited.
winstonia83 wrote: » My mate sold £140k worth of BTC a few weeks back, it's in his Natwest account and his accountant said his tax bill will be £22,500 on that sale due next April so it's not that bad tax wise in the UK. He works full time too.
Jafin wrote: » My friend who got me into crypto is in the UK too and their CGT is much more relaxed than ours. I think the tax free profit is either 20k or 40k, and the percentage is less than ours too.
FileNotFound wrote: » I have a UK account, wonder would using it equate to offshore banking?
Bob24 wrote: » You are meant to inform revenue whenever you open an account abroad (not clear how it works if the account was opened while you were not a tax resident in Ireland though). But besides this you can use it the same as an Irish account and it makes no difference to your tax liabilities (if you are receiving interests though you need to file a tax return as DIRT wouldn’t be applied by the U.K. bank).
Jackben75 wrote: » Solana - listing on coinbase pro, just to clarify that in case people think it is a full listing on coinbase
FileNotFound wrote: » Etherium gone sub 2k