mfceiling wrote: » North or South?
pickarooney wrote: » They're luring people in with a vaccine and injecting them with heroin?
jacothelad wrote: » . Here is the front elevation which has 20 windows in all. I really loved the house but it went through heating oil like a WW1 battleship..:D
Zzippy wrote: » Aha! Jaco is Basil Fawlty!
jacothelad wrote: » There is a house 400m away on the market for £1.000,000. Go figure.
pickarooney wrote: » Does that say one pound, a thousand pounds or a million pounds?
irishbucsfan wrote: » It’s one pound accurate to 6 decimal places, pretty sure
jacothelad wrote: » Sorry. £1,000,000. I need new specs but can't get an eye test thanks to Covid....:D It is a lovely house though.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Why are the UK in eurovision? What was that whole brexit thing about?
dregin wrote: » Aren't Australia and Israel in it?
Deleted User wrote: » Why are the UK in eurovision? What was that whole brexit thing about?
prawnsambo wrote: » Well they got nul points, so honour is satisfied.
pickarooney wrote: » Where does the expression 'nul points' come from?
b.gud wrote: » Does anyone know was the song completely rubbish or was it a bit more of a "political" thing because of Brexit?
Former Former Former wrote: » Not a rubbish song but just not what Eurovision is about any more, just like our entry. Brexit isn't relevant because a heap of countries aren't even in the EU. Why would the Georgian or Azerbaijani juries care if the UK left the EU?
Podge_irl wrote: » It is "nil points" au francais.
Bazzo wrote: » They wouldn't be relevant either way unless it was a particularly good song. The UK missed out on a heap of votes from Western countries they would have got in the past because of the current mood, no doubt. The vast majority of Eurovision songs aren't my bag at all but even I think the song they entered didn't deserve 0 points, there was some unbelievable ****e in there that picked up the odd few pity points.
pickarooney wrote: » It isn't though, or anything like it.