jmcc wrote: » And some of them don't like the daylight hence the continued deflection. Regards...jmcc
FrancieBrady wrote: » Never an onus put on the imperious UK to do the right thing? SF in fairness have put the hand out many times. The verdict of the court is very fresh in the Ballymurphy case. The onus was surely on the UK to recognise it? Johnson's mealy mouthed attempt at a state apology was probably a big factor in this. The Irish power swap and the SDLP's are far too weak traditionally on these issues - tripping over themselves 'not to offend'. Hasn't meant much when looking for some respect from sections of Unionism and the British.
StupidLikeAFox wrote: » Any thoughts on the sinn fein abu database? The only one we know about so far?
batman75 wrote: » Whatabouteary
FrancieBrady wrote: » So basically what you are saying is that MoN should do what she is told to do by you and shut up? She should have no principles or feelings coz, she might offend a monarch? The hat doffing inferiority in that is awesome.
Marine Layer wrote: » I don't think it's hat doffing The poster just doesn't understand probably that meeting the royals in the middle of the Ballymurphy situation would be insensitive I presume that's the reason She did not meet them She's already been adequately courteous at other times most recently on Philip's death Its something the Royals would be informed of anyway No slight
batman75 wrote: » If Foster refused to meet Michael D I would make the very same point. O'Neill is no longer just a member of SF. She is deputy first minister of NI. It's time her actions show she is deputy fm for all the people of NI not just Catholics. Prince Charles could easily have refused to meet O'Neill on account of the IRA murdering his uncle. But I'm not aware that that would have been an issue.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So only 'catholics' might think it is wrong to shoot innocent people dead in the street and have their titular leader visit the very city it happened in and completely ignore that fact? Why are you sectarianising it all over again?
batman75 wrote: » You brought up the word sectarian and you haven't read my post properly. Try again
batman75 wrote: It's time her actions show she is deputy fm for all the people of NI not just Catholics.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Why are you assuming only 'catholics' would think it insensitive and insulting for the head of the regiment that shot dead 10 innocent people was visitinig the city where it happened and didn't plan an apology? Why would any self respecting person believe that is right? You are sectarianising it by stating only Catholics would think it wrong.
batman75 wrote: » I don't recall my post mentioning Ballymurphy. My point is her electorial mandate comes predominantly from Catholics. However she is deputy fm for all the people of NI and on that basis should have met with Prince Charles. Her role as deputy fm should transcend any issues SF have with the British Government in scenario's like this.
Deferential, glad to be of use, Politic, cautious, and meticulous; Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse; At times, indeed, almost ridiculous – Almost, at times, the Fool.
jmcc wrote: » And the DPC is conducting an audit of all political parties and their handling of voter data.https://www.thejournal.ie/dpc-audit-political-parties-5442385-May2021/ The law of unintended consequences seems to be quite active with this. It started out as a Sindo/FG "get SF" campaign. It had FG busted for tracking users without telling them and had loads of FF/FG politicians pulling down their non-compliant websites. Regards...jmcc
jmcc wrote: » I'd like to see the schema and sample data rather than rely upon the Sindo/Indo. Regards...jmcc
markodaly wrote: » Yet, you rely and take on board anything SF says about the matter when they are defending it.
jmcc wrote: » I don't consider the Sindo/Indo journalists to be experts on databases. As I said, I would like to see the database schema and sample data. Regards...jmcc
Fann Linn wrote: » I'd be more worried about the HSE databases. Would've thought FG would have provided the funding to look after this sensitive information.
downcow wrote: » I honestly thought this was a wind up. I had to watch it about 5 times to decide it is actually real. Has she lost the plot?https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMen1D7Mj/
smurgen wrote: » Or the data commissioners operations. Seems like the EU want to take action against Ireland for GDPR failings. I'm sure the FG lads will be all over this this weekend since they're that concerned about data all of a sudden.https://twitter.com/fborgesius/status/1395422843010174976?s=19
Sweet.Science wrote: » What hope is there for our country when the saviour of housing is celebrating 1000 apartments bring declined planning permission I don't care who is building them , where they are , what it looks like . Just kept them built I give up on the country
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you are sticking with your corrupt police and CPS and now the independent inquiry team? Rather than just admit you over reacted again?
downcow wrote: » I'm not sure if you get access to this down south, but if you do not then let me know and I will try and post the clip for you. This will demonstrate why the unionist community, and indeed ordinary nationalists, want to get to the bottom of the story funeralhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000w9mk/nolan-live-series-15-19052021
Fann Linn wrote: » Would you be happy paying these prices for social housing?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c50f1c871638bccbbf9aa952593dd0cd.svg)
