Deleted User wrote: » What's your problem?
Mav11 wrote: » I agree. Was there not a movement a few years ago by those with a republican bent to change all placenames with a British connection e.g. Victoria Rd?
cantalach wrote: » With their campaign materials in the Queen's finest English... Meanwhile, Cork City Council allows a new housing development next to Con on Boreenmanna Road to be called Aylesbury. Seriously?
greedygoblin wrote: » What cork_exile is saying is that without signposts enforcement is not possible from a legal perspective. Hence the comment earlier about the torn up tickets...
Mardyke wrote: » I understand what he's saying!! It's just a poor argument. If people weren't so selfish and ignorant then enforcement wouldn't even be needed. It's scumbags pushing the law to the limits. Do you have signposts informing people not to take a dump in your wheelie bin, for example?!! You shouldn't need to!!
[Deleted User] wrote: » Bullcrap. It's required to have sings, it's the law around the lanes. And it seems that you don't understand as it is NOT a cycle lane without them. Without them the lanes are just fancy squggles on the ground. What you're proposing is that we can break the law around creating cycle lanes, whike yiu give out about people breaking the law parking in them. So, just say that you don't know if there are signs or not, and we can both wait for someone mode informed.
Mardyke wrote: » This attitude is what makes Ireland such a crap place to live these days, certainly in terms of healthy living and moving to a non car centric society. Sad.
Mardyke wrote: » If people weren't so selfish and ignorant then enforcement wouldn't even be needed. It's scumbags pushing the law to the limits.
Chris_5339762 wrote: » Some helpful person was driving down the new cycle lane in Glounthaune yesterday. You know the really nice wide new segregated one.
marno21 wrote: » https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-40290341.html Consultants to be appointed by months end to progress the Cork suburban rail project. Jacobs already working on the Light Rail and Jarrett Walker & Associates working on the redesigned bus network.
namloc1980 wrote: » But how did the signs not magically stop them from doing it?? I mean, signs are the answer to all our problems.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Then you can complain about enforcement. No signs means they are doing nothing illegal (on the parking aspect anyway)
namloc1980 wrote: » The are signs in the Glounthaune cycle path and they still did it.
Deleted User wrote: » So that's an enforcement issue and we should be complaining to the correct authority. I was asking a simple question about the parking image
Pandiculation wrote: » It’ll need bollards. If you look at how unenforceable the clear way was on MacCurtain Street for all the time its existed and & been signed, it’s very obvious that in a place like the South Mall, you’ll just get tons of parking.
namloc1980 wrote: » . Are they going to put up barriers to protect the new cycle lane on South Mall? If not it's just going to turn into a car park.
cgcsb wrote: » You'd wonder what's wrong with people that they look at that and say 'oh, free parking'.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Then get the law changed (if it has not got signage)
Mardyke wrote: » Jog on willya. With your signs and your Law For Dummies paperback. Disgraceful attitude.
fonecrusher1 wrote: » Unfortunately regardless of whether there are signs or not some people are just lazy selfish godshytes who'll park where they want. Then play the old oh I didn't know that bit of road with the funny markings wasn't somewhere I could park!