Pandiculation wrote: » There are a few other examples of reuse of the same street name in Cork. The council should tidy it up. Also while I’m on the topic of crazy stuff, the use of house names and no numbers in quite a few areas of this city is bonkers. How An Post ever allowed it to happen in fairly densely populated streets is beyond me. It’s also not snobbery where people replace numbers with house names, but you just have no numbering at all in some of the older parts of the city.
Mav11 wrote: » An Post has no authority in this area. All these legacy issues with non unique addresses etc. is the problem that Eircode has to a large extent sorted out.
Reputable Rog wrote: » Extremely popular with Bishopstown residents. I lived beside for it a few years and it was very handy.
Treehelpplease wrote: » Eircodes should fix that though no?
beer enigma wrote: » Anyone know what's planned for the hoarded off site just past the CSO on the left heading towards Mahon point. I know they knocked some sort of factory there years ago and are using it as a car park, but I saw there was a large pile driving machine drilling there yesterday.
Mefistofelino wrote: » It was (and still may be) a JCD site. I think they parked it while they were working on Albert Quay and moving on to the Sextant as they only seem to deal with one large project at a time. With the Sextant on the long finger, maybe they are turning their attention back to this. The original plan was for three office blocks, IIRC and JCD went back to the Council for permission to change one block to apartments, which was rejected.
Shedite27 wrote: » I used to love Pizzalandhttps://twitter.com/RandomCorkStuff/status/754401934090629124/photo/1
fonecrusher1 wrote: » I knew a lad who worked in Victoria hotel many years ago. He said some of the rooms occasionally had occupants complaining of certain supernatural occurrences and some hotel staff refused to go into one or two particular rooms to clean up. :eek:
whisky_galore wrote: » Yeah right.
the beer revolu wrote: » Most hotels in old buildings have these stories. The Maldron being one. No doubt The imperial and metropole have their ghosts, too. Haven't heard about those ones, though.
namloc1980 wrote: » . Are they going to put up barriers to protect the new cycle lane on South Mall? If not it's just going to turn into a car park.
Deleted User wrote: » Is it signposted, etc?
namloc1980 wrote: » No idea. But signposts are about as useful as a chocolate fireguard as we know well from the abuse of the cycle lane at Alfred Street by motorists. The was until actual physical separation was put in place.
Deleted User wrote: » As the torn up tickets outside Con show, signage is everything
namloc1980 wrote: » Signage didn't stop widespread abuse of Alfred Street by motorists. Enforcement is key. All the signs in the world are useless without enforcement or physical segregation.
[Deleted User] wrote: » What I'm saying is that enforcement is not possible without correct signs. And, if there are not signs, it's not a bike lane I'm just asking a question because the image doesn't show
Mardyke wrote: » Signposts? Saying what? "This way if you're a Dickh-ead" ?
hot buttered scones wrote: » I worked in that Burgerland for a few years. Saturday nights were absolute mayhem
[Deleted User] wrote: » What's your problem?
Mardyke wrote: » My problem is with entitled pricks that need a signpost to tell them not park on a cycle lane that has been put in to keep people safe. My problem is that people are so lazy and ignorant these days that they couldn't care less if a kid (or anyone) died because of their illegal parking. What's your problem?
cantalach wrote: » On the subject of the physically segregated cycle paths that have been developed over the last year, a problem is starting to become apparent. Most of them are starting to accumulate a lot of debris that is kicked in by passing motor vehicles. The use of road sweepers in the main traffic lanes exacerbates the problem. Some stretches are already unusable puncture minefields. Putting in cycling infrastructure requires a commitment to regular maintenance and sweeping, i.e. it needs ongoing op-ex as well as the initial cap-ex. I'm not sure Cork City Council gets this.
TheChizler wrote: » Is there a problem to solve though? I've never found it confusing, maybe people do initially. I think changing street names is much more confusing. Anglesea Street is up for a name change, bit of a populist move that noone was calling for IMO. Soon you'll have the Anglesea St Garda amd fire station but no Anglesea St.
boardise wrote: » I'm all against this tampering with long established placenames that have historical resonance. There are new developments constantly coming along that can be used to mark people or events of significance but please let the old ones be.