titan18 wrote: » UCC gets attention cos of the Quad tbf and the whole Hogwarts looking thing.
sporina wrote: » oh oh traders are not happy..https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-40284917.html
Deleted User wrote: » It's pretty, but it's obviously no Trinity.
Pandiculation wrote: » We should be looking at the city centre primarily as a place we live in, shop in, socialise in and as a big shared cultural space. It’s not all about tourism. It’s a living city and somewhere that has to thrive. We’re absolutely going to need toilets in the city centre with outdoor dining being the norm for potential the rest of this year. When COVID is under control, I suspect we will gradually go back to normal and that toilet bloc can probably be downscaled again. In the long term though we do need to have a proper city centre facility of some sort for toilets, baby change and so on. We can’t just keep closing stuff because of fear of junkies using them. We need to supervise and prevent problems. The one thing that’s concerning me in Cork is the Mary Elmes Bridge. It’s a nice idea but the surfaces seem to all prone to graffiti and damage. I think they could have made much better choices of surface finishes.
sporina wrote: » who said it is about tourism?
Pandiculation wrote: » The one thing that’s concerning me in Cork is the Mary Elmes Bridge. It’s a nice idea but the surfaces seem to all prone to graffiti and damage. I think they could have made much better choices of surface finishes.
PreCocious wrote: » Ah here. If people want Hogwarts they'll find it in Oxford or Cambridge or wherever Terfy Rowling drew her inspiration from. UCC is a fairly bland campus.
Pandiculation wrote: » In the long term though we do need to have a proper city centre facility of some sort for toilets, baby change and so on. We can’t just keep closing stuff because of fear of junkies using them. We need to supervise and prevent problems
the beer revolu wrote: » Perhaps if people weren't so averse to injection centres, public toilets wouldn't be used for drug taking so much. I live in the Shandon area. There is a bit of a problem with people shooting up in the lane ways. Most of the local residents are vehemently against an injection centre in the area claiming it would attract drug users! Hello? There are already people shooting up on your streets!
Pandiculation wrote: » If you read the thread there was discussion about relevance of English Market, tourism etc. Anyway, I’ve clearly annoyed you for some reason. Not sure why I bothered posting.
sporina wrote: » While I don't think that this is why there is resistance to the plan being discussed here, you are so right in terms of dealing with the problem of drug taking in public places etc.. I rem it being discussed on the radio a few years ago.. but dunno what became of it.. injection centres should definitely be set up.
the beer revolu wrote: » Yeah, it's just that whenever public toilets are mentioned, drug use is brought up as a reason there can't be public toilets.
beer enigma wrote: » For me this has nothing to do with drug use, this is purely siting it between the two market entrances that I have an issue with for the reason in my post a few pages ago. Does however seem strange that they wouldn't just reopen the other 'new' one that's already in place on Grand Parade. That was indeed closed due to antisocial behaviour, so this seems like kicking the can down the road and unnecesary expenditure.
Deleted User wrote: » Any time I saw the inside of that public toilet on Grand Parade the inside was absolutely trashed, covered in ****e and rubbish. This was the pre heroin days. I think the Irish are probably amongst the most selfish and anti social people in the Western World. That is why we don't have public toilets and other countries do.
partyguinness wrote: » I am in England and I cannot think of any public toilets near me- I can think of plenty of closed toilet blocks though.
the beer revolu wrote: » Possibly because toilets inside a building with another propose would be supervised, whereas it's difficult to supervise the auto ones. I'm neither for or against these toilets but I don't buy the "hygiene" argument, at all. I think people are forgetting that the proposed toilets are just a part of the development of this site. (I'm not claiming that you made this argument)
the beer revolu wrote: » I'm really not sure what's the best use for that space is but I fear it will end up as a room with old photographs and information boards and a couple of poems on the wall. Oh, and that pic of the UK Queen and the fish seller. I genuinely think toilets would be a better use than something like that. Does anyone have any better ideas?
fulanoquetal wrote: » I believe that there needs to be some sort of public toilet facility. 1. Any retail facility (individual or combined) exceeding X Sq M must provide and maintain toilet facilities which are available for public use. Greater area = more toilets 2. A single city centre facility could be manned for security and maintenance. Keep it open 9-9 or something. Charge people for usage like they have done in other countries. Eu 1 should not be too much to ask for a clean safe place to use. 3. Build vandal resistant facilites in such a way that they can be hosed down with a high pressure steam cleaner.