[Deleted User] wrote: » One of us is misunderstanding the term stable coin
djan wrote: » Yup, a coin's price being stable does not make it a stablecoin but merely a coin with a stable price
worded wrote: » Anyone for shib? Where to buy it ?https://www.coindesk.com/chinese-crypto-traders-shib-coin-doge-killer
Whelo79 wrote: » Your post is a little out of date. Have you not seen what happened yesterday?
worded wrote: » Was the dog put down?
Meredith Rotten Tannery wrote: » What are people's opinions on HBAR? I've been reading and it seems that it not only addresses the main ESG concerns of other coins (AML/NYC carbon etc.) but the blockchain thing they use seems more advanced and useful than others, and already has major MNCS involved.
patnor1011 wrote: » I think that bitcoin futures made this whole volatility even worse as people like Elon are cleaning out long or short position whenever they choose to do so or when they feel like they need couple dollars more.
weemcd wrote: » A friend of mine who is a lot more knowledgeable than I has been very bullish on this for a number of months. Can't say I know too much myself. I don't see too much hype around it yet, which is a good thing. It definitely has room to grow.
Whelo79 wrote: » Vitalik donated $1Bn in Shiba to the Indian covid relief fund and dumped all the other dog meme coins that had sent 50% of their minted tokens to him. He crashed almost everything.
bfa1509 wrote: » Vitalik needs quit with the philanthropy to pull the finger out for Eth2
Shedite27 wrote: » He's worth $150bn. I doubt he's risking legal trouble for a bit of money
patnor1011 wrote: » It does not matter how much they or you or me have. Everyone wants more. It is that simple. Elon did business. He got stopped in China so he tweets about eco impact of bitcoin mining which is done mainly in China and voila... China reevaluated their position and will go ahead with original plans. It only take a while for people to see what is really going on what is sad is that many people lose in the process when rich people do what they feel like just to get more rich...
harmless wrote: » He slowed the growth of some shady meme tokens, lowered gas fees and sent crypto aid to a county that wants to ban it. All in one move.
Bob24 wrote: » I am in two minds about this. I agree with the above points, plus I suspect he’s fed-up with memecoin creators airdropping tokens to his wallets as some sort of proof of credibility and here he is sending them a message telling them to stop. But on the other hand it is also true that a direct consequence of his action is the destruction of value for probably hundreds of thousands of people holding those tokens. I get that he isn’t scamming anyone and he did nothing to find himself in the situation whereby he is controlling a massive supply of those tokens, but still he made the choice to release that supply with fully knowledge of the consequences.
harmless wrote: » IMO short term loss to maintain integrity of ETH tokens, they must stand on the actual value that they provide. He has always been about utility over storeage of wealth. It's what sets ETH apart from bitcoin.
Bob24 wrote: » I don’t disagree, and possibly that was the better choice if it can stop this meme coin madness. But it is a matter of perspective; it did have real negative financial consequences on many people which is a large responsibility he took on his shoulders. And while it might be seen as irrelevant, many of those people will hate him for this.