mockingjay wrote: » I went to a nationwide opticians last year for an eye test as I was beginning to have difficulty seeing the date on my watch, got the eye test and it came out at something like 0.5mm (I think) in one eye. The optician was a little pushy and brought me straight over to glasses around €150 range, I felt that maybe I didn't need glasses yet and said I would think about it, I asked her for my results which she wouldn't give, said they don't do that (I spotted it on one of the sheets). I came home and googled my result and it was the minimal requirement for glasses so I left it, couldn't really afford it anyway. I got a free appointment voucher for the same opticians in a magazine last week, so I have made an appointment next week to get another test. I am also entitled to the new PRSI scheme, so I am thinking of using the PRSI in my local opticians to see how they fare out against the large chain - am I just paranoid or should I trust their results?
Daisies wrote: » *Disclaimer- I am an optometrist who works in both big chains and smaller opticians* No matter where I am working I will tend to say to people that if the problem is big enough that it prompted them to get an eye test and my results are improving their vision then glasses will help. Some people are more affected by small prescriptions than others. I have seen people who say the smallest strength has helped them hugely and I've also seen people who need twice or three times that strength manage perfectly well without glasses. You are legally entitled to a copy of your prescription. Also, most of those free vouchers say it cannot be used if you are entitled to PRSI scheme
mockingjay wrote: » Thank you for your reply. Just wondering how would they know if I was entitled to PRSI, could I not just go in, get the test & say I’m a stay at home mum? TIA
marvin80 wrote: » Maybe a daft question but does eyesight get worse with time? I wear glasses and get eye tests every 2 years and every time I have to get my lens replaced - always an expensive trip.
SoulWriter wrote: » I was talking to someone who was in Specsavers last week. They were immediately pushed the 129 euro range. when they enquired about the 89 euro range the staff member said they would not be as sturdy and gave impression they were inferior but surely anything on sale must be up to a reasonable standard.
NIMAN wrote: » I bought a pair of £29 glasses, they were perfectly fine. Then got 2 more pairs online for £25, and again fine. Of course a £100 frame might have been better quality, but I'm not too bothered about my glasses, they are only functional for me. On the subject of trusting opticians, I got my eyes tested in August, and was delighted when optician told me my prescription had nearly halved, and I'd probably be back to no glasses needed for distance in the next 5 years. I went and got some glasses online using his prescription. They didn't work for me, and I put it down to cheap quality glasses, as it was the first time I had ordered online. I later went to another optician in the North and got re-done. The prescription was similar to my original, but very slightly better, so the original test was either completely wrong or else the person in the office copied someone elses details into the card she handed me.
SoulWriter wrote: » where did you get the two more pairs online for £25? I understand they were OK
_Brian wrote: » Sooooo You were having difficulty reading something you could read before. Went to a professional who said yes, you could benefit from glasses. And then decided they were trying to stitch you up by saying you needed glasses ?