AMKC wrote: » Kind of ironic really that Mercedes wanted more expensive and complicated not less complicated engines if it was going to remain in the sport. I suppose because they already had a head start on them and had already started work on there Power units they knew they would be ahead of all the other teams so they did not really care.
Frank Bullitt wrote: » That is basically the British media in a nutshell. Schumacher was only successful because of the car, Hamilton is because be is great. Give...me...a...break.
Captain_Crash wrote: » Well Merc complained so it will be illegal next week!!
skipper_G wrote: » Teams protest each other all the time, but Mercedes do it and they're somehow worse than anyone else. How does that work? I suppose the narrative here is just Mercedes = bad
TheQ_Man wrote: » When interviewed on Top Gear Schumacher admitted after being asked by Clarkson it was the car. I wonder what would Hamilton say? Probably a laugh while thinking of his PR trained answer
Frank Bullitt wrote: » And to give Schumacher his due, he went to Ferrari when they were a total shambles. He made them that powerhouse, and boy did he work hard at that. Might as well post my favourite Top Gear moment of all time.
barryribs wrote: » One thing I always admired is the fact that he left what was a run away championship winner for a new challenge. Realistically he would have challenged for the championship in 96 and 97 in those Bennetons too. I doubt we'll see the stability that he, Brawn and Todt brought to Ferrari ever again.
Frank Bullitt wrote: » https://streamable.com/6xb9xv So this is a video of the rear wing flex that Merc complained about in relation to RB. It does move, but they all do under load. It has passed the tests so maybe the FIA will have to change the test in order for it to be illegal.
sk8board wrote: » Loads of online chatter last night from F1 journo’s that they were at a Mclaren event yesterday to preview some ‘huge’ F1 news for this Sunday at 6pm - and it’s under a very strict embargo apparently. Cant imagine what it would be at this stage in the season, but If it’s some sponsor or indycar announcement, I’ll be very disappointed!
Pen Rua wrote: » I've read some of the comments over on r/formula1, and some have made some good points. Only F1 journalists seem to have been invited - no sportscar journo's or Indycar journo's were invited so it seems unlikely to be a WEC or Indycar announcement. Buxton on Twitter says the event took place not at the MTC, but at their old building pre-MTC which is now used for the GT division.https://twitter.com/wbuxtonofficial/status/1392370712611065858
sk8board wrote: » It really doesn’t matter if it was Mercedes protested it or someone else, this one is a slam dunk. They all see the RB wing was flexing, the pit Lane is a very small community and every team has a race team back at HQ monitoring every last thing - merc’s HQ race team is over 60 people Like the RP brake ducts last year, only one team needs to protest (although Mclaren and Renault both took the lead that time, a s Renault then further appealed it too). ditto for the secret Ferrari trouble the previous season. A protest from the heritage teams probably carry’s more weight.
barryribs wrote: » I wouldn't consider it cheating, I think that it was probably designed to pass the FIA test and flex as much as possible. FIA will likely change the test for the amount of flex on the rear wing, but if I was in Red Bulls shoes, I wouldn't be happy for different parameters being tested mid-season.
[Deleted User] wrote: » A new McLaren F1 I'm going to guess. That Jon Noble tweets finishes with #f1 which I can imagine him smirking about as a way to get around the embargo. :pac:
sk8board wrote: » I was thinking of the Merc steering ingenuity from last season - there was immediate outcry but it required a new rule and only outlawed from the end of the season. Considering the nature of F1 reg’s, was ingenious really. I imagine the other teams wondering why their own in-house brains hadn’t thought of it This is different in that the reg already exists for flexing. It’ll be interesting to see how it pans out.
But there is another reason why Red Bull remains so calm. Sport1 learned: Unfortunately, the FIA regular guards do not target the Verstappen team at all, but rather Alpine. The former Renault factory team is said to be the biggest champion in bending. This would prove top-speed measurements.
Frank Bullitt wrote: » https://f1-insider.com/formel-1-red-bull-heckflugel-hamilton-anklage/ This will put the cat amongst the pigeons. RB sound very calm about what may come their way, which I hope doesn't ruin this close season.
sk8board wrote: » When I say a slam dunk, I mean that the tolerances on modern F1 cars are calibrated to a phenomenal degree - if a wing is flexing under load by a millimetre, it’s being done intentionally.