Dummy opening post
blackwhite wrote: » Despite happening right in front of the Garda car and the horn from the other car surely alerting their attention to it all, not a hint of them going after the c*nt.
Mundo7976 wrote: » -10% Gardai seem more bothered that you would ring them in the first place!
Fighting Tao wrote: » 0%
ARX wrote: » No reaction from the Garda car. They really couldn't care less.
Effects wrote: » I was on the quays a few years back, loads of cars driving in the bus lane, skipping the queues. I asked two Gardaí in a van in the lane next to me about it. Their response was "what do you want us to do about it". Some of them just don't care about enforcing some laws/rules of the road.
magicbastarder wrote: » a chap i know was the driver in a pedestrian fatality. he was held to be completely blameless, by both the victim's family and the gardai, and witnesses who saw the incident. he took it badly, as you might expect - he sold his house because he didn't want to have to drive that road again, but within a few years had moved back to the area. time heals, i guess.
Seth Brundle wrote: » What kind of wank3r thinks it is ok to endanger a bunch of children just to get to the next set of red lights quicker?https://twitter.com/donna_cooney1/status/1392763555917832194
fixXxer wrote: » He's talking about the truck putting kids in danger so it can get through the lights quicker, not the cycle bus.
sy_flembeck wrote: » Mother slightly out to the edge in a protective manner (we've all done it).
riewomann wrote: » I love cycling as much as the next person, but the optics of this are terrible. Its a big two fingers to everyone else and reeks of a "my child is the most important thing in the world, so if I have to incenvenience hundreds of people for them to have a spin, then so be it". Rant over.
magicbastarder wrote: » the dutch have a nickname for cycle lanes which are nothing more than a line of paint; they call them murder strips.
riewomann wrote: » "my child is the most important thing in the world, so if I have to incenvenience hundreds of people for them to have a spin, then so be it". Rant over.
Dowee wrote: » So many things wrong with this. 1. Cycling two abreast: Perfectly Legal.
Deleted User wrote: » Maybe I'm not remembering what it was like pre-covid but to me the traffic around town seems to be worse now than pre-covid the tailback on Donore Rd yesterday and at John's shop on the Platin Rd were unreal. Don't recall them being as bad as that. Donore Rd usually backs up on the way in for evening rush but it was backed up in both directions from about 2pm yesterday. Great on the bike though you sail passed the whole mess then you get a bus driver trying to get out of the station at the bottom trying to bully his way out as I approach and ends up blocking the lane and the footpath for a woman with small kids and a buggy. She wasn't shy about telling him to reverse, although she used slightly stronger language
Eamonnator wrote: » I notice the Dublin Road is crazy at 3.30/4.00pm, backed up nearly to The Black Bull, bad at lunch time as well.
TallGlass2 wrote: » Good camera system for the push bike?
McGaggs wrote: » Anyone complaining about cycling 2 abreast is saying that they believe cyclists should cycle in the gutter so they can be passed without a proper overtaking manouver. I also fail to understand how they think 2 cyclists in single file is easier to overtake than 2 abreast.
riewomann wrote: » Where there is a cycle lane, one can pass a cyclist safely despite oncoming traffic as no lane change is necessary. ie cyclist in cycle lane does not affect traffic in regular lane. Where there is a cyclist in the cycle lane and another cyclist cycling in the traffic lane, one then cannot proceed unless the oncoming traffic lane is clear as you essentially have a cyclist using the regular lane who needs to be overtaken.
riewomann wrote: » Where there is a cycle lane, one can pass a cyclist safely despite oncoming traffic as no lane change is necessary. ie cyclist in cycle lane does not affect traffic in regular lane.