FrancieBrady wrote: » Not sure why you are so anxious to protect the DPC from scrutiny. But anyway.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I made the point that if successive governments have not resourced the DPC properly it's a bit rich to be attaching importance to breaches now. Much more important is the breaches outside the political sphere I would imagine.
CrookedJack wrote: » I really have to admire that your argument basically amounts to "FFFG didn't resource the DPC enough to preemptively force SF not to break GDPR rules, so let's blame them" That really is next level deflection - an impressive and marketable ability.
[Deleted User] wrote: » If so, then there's an enormous issue around privacy, and Philip Ryan is about to strike gold as a journalist. [/I]
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Not sure that I agree with your conclusion that scraping information off Facebook is not an issue. Either way, the enormity of the issue largely depends on whether they got the person's consent. They probably didn't, but if they did, the whole thing is a non issue.
Deleted User wrote: » Here's the long and the short of it, and where journalists are currently digging.https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=116985072&postcount=4494This is the synopsis so far: SF took a a copy of the electoral register from each constituency and made a digital copy of it, or got a 3rd party to do so. The electoral register is used by loads of marketing companies, State agencies, utility providers etc so all cool so far. I'd be disappointed if other political parties hadn't done so as well. Kudos to SF.SF then used data extracted from Facebook groups, surveys, and targetted advertising to augment the electoral register with information on potential SF voters based on likes, comments, and all the usual shíte you actually agree to when you sign up for Facebook and other 'social media' services. It's not great, but we all live in a world of targetted advertising, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't taking place with other parties to a lesser extent. SF host the Abú database in Frankfurt. A nothing burger tbh. It's all very cloudy out there, and their 'instances' moved from London to Frankfurt in line with what most companies started doing as Brexit became a reality. They could have hosted in Ireland, but were using the Linode cloud service which doesn't have a presence in Ireland. Not worried about this at all. Now we get down to the 'brass tacks' of the story. The Abú system is available to party activists. Do all party activists have access to all records despite who they are? Did the Data Protection Officer in SF ensure data was only made available to those who need to have access to it? Should someone in Donegal have access to the records of someone in Cork, and for what reasons? Have those records been made available to activists outside the Irish State, and for what reason? Finally, does the Abú database hold additional information on people above-and-beyond what was gathered using the electoral register and social media activity? A simple example. A SF activist visited the door of John Q Taxpayer. John was watching Coronation Street, and was pissed off with having his door knocked upon, despite once having liked a post about housing that Eoin O Broin posted on Facebook. John told them he wasn't interested, and closed the door. What data was uploaded to the Abú system about that interaction? Was there free text entered in the Abú system about that? If so, then there's an enormous issue around privacy, and Philip Ryan is about to strike gold as a journalist.
McAuliffe took part in her first election count in 1977 when Jack Lynch’s Fianna Fail had a landslide win. A nurse by trade, she took over the job of inputting all the tallies into the computer in the late 1980s, having completed a weekend course in Excel. https://www.businesspost.ie/election2020/tally-ho-the-secret-to-calling-the-election-2020-votes-a15df638
In total, we now have over one million constituents registered on our system. Based on the last (2012) census population statistics which placed the population at 4.589 million, this means that 22%, or slightly over one in five Irish citizens, is attached to a canvasser account on our system as a registered occupant.
expectationlost wrote: » https://twitter.com/GeneKerrigan/status/1391350846445719552 via https://www.rte.ie/archives/2017/0524/877557-the-role-of-the-tallymen/ https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/data-harvesting-is-it-worse-when-sinn-fein-do-it-40403213.htmlhttps://www.businesspost.ie/election2020/tally-ho-the-secret-to-calling-the-election-2020-votes-a15df638 just add canvassing records ps https://www.independent.ie/business/m50-directors-unmasked-26473547.html https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/senator-at-funeral-on-day-alleged-bribe-given-25932446.html https://electionsireland.org/candidate.cfm?ID=4580
blanch152 wrote: » I haven't read his column as it is behind a paywall, but are you seriously suggesting that Gene Kerrigan is comparing the computerising of anonymised tally records without any personal information with the Abu database which was building a personal individualised profile of every voter in the country??? If he was comparing the two, he is probably the journalist most ignorant of GDPR in the whole country.
expectationlost wrote: » no Im suggesting that if you add this tallying data to canvassing records, surveys etc it is comparable.
blanch152 wrote: » How? Explain to me how anonymised tallying data compares to the Abu database, in simple GDPR terms.
beakerjoe wrote: » If its anonymised its no longer personal data right?
expectationlost wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/data-harvesting-is-it-worse-when-sinn-fein-do-it-40403213.html
FrancieBrady wrote: » I can see now after reading Kerrigan's description, why my local FF TD at the time (early 80's) was able to say, he could tell you how every house voted on the street where I lived.
Deleted User wrote: » Stop digging, Francis. In the 80’s we had a smaller population, 2 utterly dominant parties, strong family associations with parties, and far less movement of people to live in cities. Trying to make some association between then and SF’s sinister Abú system is stupid tbh. Kerrigan has always been a crank (a Stickie as well, Francie). A real pointing out the problems and extreme socialism is the solution type. Clutching at straws is not a good look.
blanch152 wrote: » Just got access to Kerrigan's article. As I suspected, it confuses the tallyman process with the abuse by Sinn Fein of GDPR. Tallymen can tell you how many votes each candidate got from a particular housing estate. That is generalised anonymised data. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, as individuals are not identified. Guessing which people in a housing estate voted in a particular way as a result is sailing close to the wind all right, but it falls well short of a national computerised database with every SF activist having access (you remember you claimed it couldn't be secret as a result of such access) to every voter's personal information. Kerrigan is a clown, confusing anecdotal stories from the 1980s with real threats to modern democracy.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Politicos love to exaggerate their local knowledge. They could overlay tally results on canvass outcomes, but that's not easy to do either, and constituency or ward changes complicate things.
blanch152 wrote: » Just got access to Kerrigan's article. As I suspected, it confuses the tallyman process with the abuse by Sinn Fein of GDPR. Tallymen can tell you how many votes each candidate got from a particular housing estate. That is generalised anonymised data. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, as individuals are not identified. Guessing which people in a housing estate voted in a particular way as a result is sailing close to the wind all right, but it falls well short of a national computerised database with every SF activist having access (you remember you claimed it couldn't be secret as a result of such access) to every voter's personal information.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's an article on data harvesting. He clearly makes the link whether you want to accept it or not, that by collating and collecting over a number of years/elections, voters can be identified. Is that going on? Well my local TD seemed to be saying it back in the 80's. Let's see how it all plays out and what is revealed as this is looked into on a cross party basis.
StupidLikeAFox wrote: » Cmon Francie, I know you won't give an inch when it comes to SF but you must appreciate the difference between a local lad having an opinion on your voting intentions, based on how your street voted, and a national organisation maintaining a central database on each person on the electoral register?
FrancieBrady wrote: » FFS, will you guys read threads?I have said repeatedly that if SF have broken regs here they desreve to be fined for it. The discussion has quickly widened out to what are they all up to with regard to data. We have seen websites taken down and we have an all party investigation. The topic is GDPR and Irish politics. If you wish to confine it to SF there is a thread for that too.
beakerjoe wrote: » What regulations have the broken that they deserve to be fined for? This is all a storm in a teacup.