Sierra Oscar wrote: » Poor day for Labour all round really. Some significant losses in England and Wales. Some votes gained in Scotland, but that looks more to do with unionists tactically voting and not splitting the vote in certain constituencies. Disastrous for Stamer really. They're already blaming Corbyn. Bit of a dead horse at this stage.
suicide_circus wrote: » Turns out berating your voter core for being idiot racists and focusing on niche social issues they dont relate to dosnt win you votes.
breezy1985 wrote: » As I said this morning English politics is now the same as the US for some. Vote Tory if you love Britain vote Labour if you hate Britain. The post above is exactly this crap
[Deleted User] wrote: » Did you actually read my post? As I said, you rarely see the flags in England, they will come out on special occasions though.
suicide_circus wrote: » Agreed. Why has this happened?
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: » Judging by the narrative in the media, if the SNP are a bit short of the 65 number, it looks like the unionists will use this as justification for refusing a referendum. That would be fair enough if they were the only party wanting one, but they're not. It should depend on whether a majority of pro-independence representatives are elected, not just the SNP.
10000maniacs wrote: » The post mortem begins on all the UK channels this evening. The elephant in the room has not been mentioned once yet tonight. Immigration. Burying their head in the sand on immigration will eventually kill Labour off. For better or worse, it's what the people want addressed in places like Hartlepool.
breezy1985 wrote: » Consistent media attacks on the likes of Corbyn with silly stories about him being some Soviet spy ready to open the Gulags or a secret member of the IRA Also some seem to think that young people who dont like Britains colonial past means they dont like or care about the current country. Criticism isnt hate
suicide_circus wrote: » Ah yes, the media. MSM is it? Disliking their colonial past is a pointless exercise, no amount of self flagellation for the actions of their long dead fore fathers will win an election.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Two votes, one in a FPTP constituency and another for regional lists where the constituencies are grouped together
the formula for deciding the quota needed to elect a list MSP is still D’Hondt’s V/(S+1), but the actual V and S here are a bit different. For Holyrood elections, the V is the vote cast for a particular party on the regional list. The S is the number of seats already won by each party via the FPTP constituency process – so the S differs with each political party.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » Well done lads - you made sure you undermined Corbyn and your actual core supporters for...this.
listermint wrote: » Interesting was this a campaign piece of labours? Hadn't see that. Have you any details.
suicide_circus wrote: » What did Labour do wrong to precipitate this melt down? Or is purely sisnister outside forces?
listermint wrote: » Mix of multiple factors are you really thinking it's just one thing ? Really ??
Deleted User wrote: » Yeah he was just about to renationalise everything. The entire Labour Party is a joke at this stage. Half a dozen people saw no problem with this being made public: https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1388521276256497674 It's like they don't want to win.
breezy1985 wrote: » Some "SJW woke BLM progressive" said it on twitter probably so now its put up as labour policy It was of course David Cameron who apologised for Bloody Sunday so he must hate Britain too or love the IRA like Corbyn does
suicide_circus wrote: » See, you can identify the perception problem. Maybe telling Owen Jones and Ash Sarkar to do one would help the party get back to it's roots.
devnull wrote: » News coming in from London that Shaun Bailey has took a surprising early lead in the London Mayor contest. Still a long way to go and more favorable counts for Labour to come but this was supposed to be a slam dunk for Sadiq Khan based on recent polling.
breezy1985 wrote: » Khan should still win the run off but I think this could be worse for Starmer than the North because it shows his policy is not gaining the brexiters but also losing voters to socially liberal parties