claw wrote: » Just reading some of the comments on the thread has me avoiding doubling up on United defence. I am happy just to go with Henderson and see in my bench boost does he score 4 or more than Areola who I currently have. I think the Villa match is the best chance of a clean sheet.
Fitz* wrote: » Sounds like he may be fit.https://twitter.com/MattWoosie/status/1390644301160386560 Which actually has me thinking of a -8 now. Sanchez -> Henderson Dallas -> Shaw Jrod -> Zaha I'd be gaining a couple of extra starts anyways with Thomas & Jrod, so the -8 should be covered somewhat but it is an awful lot of reliance on Utd clean sheets for points. it gives me 22 for GW35 but the bare 11 for GW36 before the FT. The alternative is Sanchez -> Henderson Thomas -> Ward Jrod -> Zaha Have Utd coverage in defence, but also has other defence also and not reliant on a rotated side. This also gives me 22 for GW35 & I'm well covered for GW36 with 13 before the FT.
893bet wrote: » Any news on Zaha fitness?
JPup wrote: » I think that thinking only really comes into the equation on a free hit. Otherwise, you are selecting players with a few gameweeks in mind. You'll always get some weeks where there is an overlap of fixtures in your team.
How Soon Is Now wrote: » Its him or Greenwood instead of Jota for me currently.
Dubh Geannain wrote: » Something similar here. Not pulled the trigger yet but for a -8. Thought I was going a bit extreme but seeing your post has given me a little reassurance. We can't both be mad surely :eek: Kane to Wally Otkins (Have DCL already) Son to Salah Stones to Trent Can we? Can we both be mad? Can we? Tell me godammit!! My doubt is the selling of 2 Spurs players for the pool punt. I'm only 8 behind in my money league so need to keep the head a little.
Fitz* wrote: » Going by this, I'd take a guess that United will rotate heavily in the Leicester game. He also alluded to Maguire not playing all 3 games.https://twitter.com/sistoney67/status/1390645974285049864
Degag wrote: » It's not the be all and end all but it's something to definitely be aware of. If you have 3 defenders up against 3 attackers, in general if your 3 attackers score, your 3 defenders blank. And vice versa.
machiavellianme wrote: » I never understand this thought process. Just because you have competing players in your team doesn't mean it's going to influence the outcome. Hedging your bets is a better option than going all in on one team or the other. Plus, both teams could score heavily and the defenders might gain attacking points.
mectavba wrote: » No one seems to be going for Rashford? He didn't start last night so surely has the best chance to start this weekend. Am I missing something? Can't afford to get bruno in without losing Salah and don't think it is worth it
Jim Gazebo wrote: » Thinking of Dcl for Kane and TAA for Alonso now instead of just Alonso to Digne and saving the free. Kane to outscore DCL in one game?? Someone convince me, I'm doing quite well and afraid I am getting sucked into DGW mindset.
How Soon Is Now wrote: » Its him or Greenwood instead of Jota for me currently. Id like to take a risk on Zaha because the benefits be huge but can you trust him? The only reason im considering a Palace defender cause hes cheap and there playing two weak teams.
Risen wrote: » i have him as vc like you i think he'll play most of it
How Soon Is Now wrote: » Wonder would Pogba be an option he could well play most of the 3 and has been more or less playing on the LW.
Ace2007 wrote: » Son/Bale both have form so thinking one of those maybe? Hard to know how good Havertz is for FF - scoring 2 against a team in bottom 3 isn't saying a lot. Also with the riches Chelsea have, does Havertz start both games? Double united defense - means you want Watkins/Nacho/Salah/TAA all to blank Utd game, or at least two of them to blank v Utd, just something to be wary
