Dummy opening post
Could leaning on the horn in this way be construed as assault? From the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997: ..... (3) No such offence is committed if the force or impact, not being intended or likely to cause injury, is in the circumstances such as is generally acceptable in the ordinary conduct of daily life and the defendant does not know or believe that it is in fact unacceptable to the other person.[/I]
ARX wrote: » (3) No such offence is committed if the force or impact, not being intended or likely to cause injury, is in the circumstances such as is generally acceptable in the ordinary conduct of daily life and the defendant does not know or believe that it is in fact unacceptable to the other person.[/I]
CramCycle wrote: » Not in that context as if you read the full sentence, they could argue that beeping a horn is not intended to cause injury (I don't agree) and they could argue they didn't know you would find it unacceptable (but they would be lying). On the same note, failure to leave appropriate distance between you and the vehicle in front (presuming they were not leaving enough distance as is often the case), driving without reasonable consideration, driver found to be driving carelessly. Fair amount of points and fines and a court appearance quite easily if the gardai were interested.
Wildly Boaring wrote: » I got over taken here R150https://maps.app.goo.gl/d53t8hKYbyzJYRmg8 Yep. On a blind, 90 degree bend, with a junction coming in from the right. As a runner and buggy pusher were waiting to cross and a passat was waiting to come out from the side road. And he gave me a good 2m!!!! He went into the opposite lane altogether. Madness.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Paging AJR...One in 10 motorists admit to texting while driving
Seth Brundle wrote: » I'd disagree - there are meaningful reasons for car occupants to need a mobile signal. We just need proper enforcement along with a fine that matches the consequences of the offence.
Duckjob wrote: » Problem with riding near the edge in a place like that is you're giving bad drivers an invite to drive selfishly and endanger you.
TheChizler wrote: » Completely agree. The odd time I drive these days and I come up behind someone riding in the gutter like that and I could physically fit past without crossing the line there's an unconscious sense that I'm the one causing delay, and most people just overtake when that happens. Probably the same feeling that makes someone ride in the gutter.
eeeee wrote: » Got cut off by a white micra covered in anti choice material. The irony was lost on them :rolleyes:
Rogue-Trooper wrote: » The poor driver got such a fright from the tap on the window that she dropped her mobile phone.......:mad:
Fighting Tao wrote: » Every vehicle (except emergency ones) should block all mobile signals.
Weepsie wrote: » Blake's cross to skerries today. I know a few do that road regularly. F*ckin he'll the standard of driving is bad. I'd consider 1 pass a in a long cycle a bad one such is the rarity really. Every few vehicles though on this stretch until I got beyond lusk at least was brutal
Duckjob wrote: » idiot man in an Audi
crosstownk wrote: » Exactly. Taxi drivers simply drive for a profession. They are not professionally trained drivers in any way. Their driving licence is identical to mine. Their attitude to cyclists is something to behold, imo.
Mundo7976 wrote: » None. Nor to the bike. Thanks for aksing ����