Mr.S wrote: » Why do people think it’s so hard to believe? Some of the well documented Irish OF’s are definitely pulling in that and more. Sure half of them post their monthly earnings on IG, far for then 12k a month! Of course not everyone pulls that in, and it’s not like it’s easy. The “hope your paying tax” argument is always comical too.
YellowLead wrote: » Because it’s well documented that to make that kind of money from it is difficult and a full time job. And if somebody was making that much, like why would they ask people on boards if they should quit their nursing job???? It’s clearly either drumming up business from eejits or a hilarious wind up https://www.xsrus.com/writing/explain/onlyfans/ Scroll down to the bit where it shows figures relating to most of the money being make by a small number of top creators. Avg. person makes 145 a month and some lose money. Apparently unless you have a large social media following to start with it won’t even be worth the effort and you’ll lose money.
ThumbTaxed wrote: » Just think about that money when your kids friends are sharing pictures of your bits around.
Health11 wrote: » Yes I will, it will be fantastic to be able to give them the best opportunities growing up.
ThumbTaxed wrote: » Others can do that without losing their dignity. It is called an education. Best of luck.
Health11 wrote: » It's bizarre some of the posts here. I don't know if it's jealousy or what. I am well aware I am in a very lucky position, and I don't think I am anything 'special' or talented.
Creamy Goodness wrote: » Good old Irish begrudgery popping into the thread. Surprised it took this long (apart from the tax man comments lol)
Health11 wrote: » The lower side of things are heavily skewed by a)guys and b)those without social media c)those who dont post explicit content/don't show their face. I am not sure what you're arguing. If you don't believe I am earning what I am earning, it makes no difference to me.
begbysback wrote: » Don’t think this will be as big an issue as you would imagine, nudity has come a long way since the 80s & 90s, much more common and generally acceptable, even a popular tv program where ye have to get naked. Not too far into the future mothers will be showing their kids naked selfies and the kids will be gasping “wtf people actually gave you money for these!!”
Mr.S wrote: » It’s obviously not secure employment, but the cash is immense so I can see why they’d be conflicted.
I’m sure if they replaced OF with YouTube - the reaction would be far different.
begbysback wrote: » Don’t think this will be as big an issue as you would imagine
Mr.S wrote: » I think OP’s post is valid - I don’t think she’s gloating or trolling - she obviously started OF on the side and grew her following over time. Isn’t that the point of the forum to ask for advice? It’s obviously not secure employment, but the cash is immense so I can see why they’d be conflicted. They are also likely not used to this level of an income, even more reason to ask for advice. I’m sure if they replaced OF with YouTube - the reaction would be far different.
YellowLead wrote: » I’m not arguing with you lol, I’m merely pointing out some facts to true few thickos that are buying this BS. I couldn’t care less what you think. But since you are engaging with me - how did you manage to get a sufficient social media presence when you are working as nurse, fair enough if somebody is unemployed they might have the time? An hour a day isn’t enough to take pictures and respond to enough messages to make the kind of money you are claiming - what’s your answer for that lol
MrMusician18 wrote: » There are lots of very successful online content creators. That is on no doubt. What is hard to believe though is that they'd be making that much and posting here looking for advice. Then again we do have resident billionaire Aonghus on the site.
Health11 wrote: » I have been on social media throughout school and college. Most of the people I follow on social media have jobs. Do you have any experience with OF? If someone hasn't replied to your message on it, that sucks.
Health11 wrote: » I never quite understand this mentality. Just because I have a bit of spare money coming in, I should stop frequenting Boards.ie? Do you think anyone posting on internet forums is a loser? Grow up.
YellowLead wrote: » I have never used it I have only read about it because people joke I should join it to make money (I have an incredible figure) - but I don’t have time because I work, plus while I have no issue with people who create content - in fact I say more power to them and why not - it wouldn’t be something I’d be interested in personally as I can make money other ways. I meant that most people don’t have enough followers on social media to make the kind of money from subscriptions you are talking about, for those who do it’s usually a full time job as an ‘influencer’. I didn’t mean social media use was only for the unemployed at all.
YellowLead wrote: » ‘Bit of spare money’ but you told us it was 120k per annum, about 4 times your usual salary? Perhaps it’s more like 100 euro you ACTUALLY make.
YellowLead wrote: » https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/onlyfans-monica-huldt-describes-how-makes-money-2020-3%3famp If you can tell us why you make more money than this lady who is considered one of the sites top earners by only putting in an hour a day....then maybe people might believe you...