Bikerman2019 wrote: » Broker says the driver is insured to drive any other car as long as it is not owned by this driver. "The second car does not need to be insured." This seems to be confirmed by the policy booklet.
coylemj wrote: » As long as your policy is not from Aviva or Liberty, that is correct. There still is an urban myth (it gets repeated here and in the Insurance forum) which holds that the car you borrow must always have it's own policy before your own 'driving other cars' cover applies. And there have been reported instances of Gardai at checkpoints who think that it's a universal rule. It's not. No disc on the windsceeen is taken to mean that there is no policy in force for that car, therefore (they think) nobody can be insured to drive it. So always carry your own cert. and be prepared to (politely) slug it out on the roadside.
coylemj wrote: » No disc on the windsceeen is taken to mean that there is no policy in force for that car, therefore (they think) nobody can be insured to drive it. So always carry your own cert. and be prepared to (politely) slug it out on the roadside.
Get Real wrote: » How does this work if failing to display an insurance disk is an offence in its own right? ..... Genuinely curious. Even if you are insured, it's an offence not to display an insurance disk, 60 euro fine. Interesting.
5. (1) When a vehicle is used in a public place the insurance disc for the vehicle shall be carried on the vehicle at all times after the expiry of 10 days from the date of authentication of the certificate of insurance.
Get Real wrote: » How does this work if failing to display an insurance disk is an offence in its own right?https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/travel_and_recreation/motoring_1/driving_offences/driving_offences.html#:~:text=Failure%20to%20display%20an%20insurance,for%20up%20to%206%20months. Genuinely curious. Even if you are insured, it's an offence not to display an insurance disk, 60 euro fine. Interesting.
Bikerman2019 wrote: » Is it permitted to photocopy the insurance disk and put it in the window of the second car as it is getting damaged taking it out and putting it in again whenever second car is taken out? Cheers
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » This is specifically prohibited in the statute.not shall any person exhibit any colourable imitation of any insurance disc or any insurance disc which has been issued in respect of another vehicle
cml387 wrote: » I think the bigger problem, if I understand the OP correctly, is that his daughter is driving an uninsured car.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » It's an interesting one, this would imply that any discs a user prints out themselves are not legit in the full legal sense as no 'original disc' could be defined or proven. A lot of insurers now only send a PDF copy of disc and expect policyholder to print out.
ELM327 wrote: » His daughter is not driving anything. He is driving the car with his third party extension until she gets a license and insurance in her own name was my reading
coylemj wrote: » That may be why Axa only allow you to download the disc PDF file once. That way they (and I) can claim that when I print it off at home, it's an 'original'.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Is it an offence to display an insurance disc from a car with a different registration number? Surely it's the policy number and insurance certificate that show the actual coverage of the policy and the policy number is displayed for anyone to record or question.
MacDanger wrote: » Would a black & white copy of the insurance disc be okay?
partyguinness wrote: » In England 5-6 years ago, they did away with displaying tax cert on windscreen. Never had to disply insurance cert.
MacDanger wrote: Would a black & white copy of the insurance disc be okay?
Claw Hammer wrote: » This is not England. We left the UK in 1922.
partyguinness wrote: » Yes I know thank you. I just making a general observation. Not fully left...
Claw Hammer wrote: » Just because they do or don't do something doesn't mean it happens here or has any relevance whatsoever in this jurisdiction.