Overheal wrote: » Where does she say race war? Point it out please. Policing in the US is inherently racist, ...
Bambi wrote: » Has happened before. The solution is to defund the police or to give them even less training with firearms. Less firearm training will ensure that there will be less mistakes.
biko wrote: » It's not only his fault. He didn't shoot himself. Trying to escape will escalate matters. Top tip - if you're pulled over, don't try to run. Here's a video with help. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8
Monkey arris wrote: » Let's get back to making it the dead man's fault.
yourdeadwright wrote: » He didn't deserver to be shot and killed but 100% it was his own actions which lead to him being in that position ,
Overheal wrote: » Right, just pull over and everything will be fine if you just comply. Here's videos, with help.
Quantum Erasure wrote: » Ah now, that's like saying the government in Ireland is inherently fascist...https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshirts
With the war lost, Southern whites' fears of African Americans increased in 1865 due to Reconstruction governments that were perceived as oppressive to the South. Even though slavery and patrols were legally ended, the patrol system still survived. Almost immediately in the aftermath of the war, informal patrols sprang into action. Later, city and rural police squads, along with the help of Union army officers, revived patrolling practices among free men. During the post-Civil War Reconstruction period of 1865–1877, old-style patrol methods resurfaced and were enforced by postwar Southern police officers and also by organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan.[7]
Overheal wrote: » Ah, victim blaming.
biko wrote: » Rashida tries to spin this unfortunate fatal accident into a race war between cops and black men, which is simply not true in this case.
biko wrote: » "Policing in our country is inherently & intentionally racist." There is nothing in this incident that points towards racism, but she just can't help herself.
Tell me how wrote: » The fact that you're using these qualifying statements is telling.
Overheal wrote: Ah, victim blaming.
eagle eye wrote: » You remind me of those guys who look to blame somebody or something else than the killer for every murder that occurs.
yourdeadwright wrote: » If you decided to stand on the road you might get hit by a car , If your stay on the path you might also get hit by a car but the probability dramatically falls & your not to be blamed at all,
biko wrote: » I am merely trying to keep Overheal from muddling the discussion with other incidents of police shootings. It didn't work.
Deleted User wrote: It's mad that no matter how many black people are shot and killed by police the same names are always here to tell us how it wasn't a racist incident and it was the victim that was in the wrong.
bewareofthedog wrote: » It's typical of Overheal to try and portray isolated incidents as the norm in a emotional way. "We got the studies", which hold absolutely no weight what so ever. Here's the only thing that matters, Cops in America are fearful of being killed by gang bangers day in day out. This put enormous physiological pressure on them and not everyone was made equally, some can't handle it. The problem is human error, nothing else and it will never be fixed. There's hundreds of millions of interactions with cops yearly that go down fine, if you want to minimize the risk of something bad going down, comply. We can continue to o throw emotional strops or dangle "studies" that show white officers aren't more likely to shoot black officers. Like I said already, this incident was caused by human error, people should go do a course on statistics or something if they have problems comprehending this.
We can continue to o throw emotional strops or dangle "studies" that show white officers aren't more likely to shoot black officers.
Overheal wrote: » This fallible thinking inexorably leads to 'police can never be at fault because the victim has always done something to attract the attention of the officer' Worry less about blaming the dead victim and concentrate more on why we keep seeing this groundhog day. My taxpayer dollars train police officers, not suspects.
Overheal wrote: » This fallible thinking inexorably leads to 'police can never be at fault because the victim has always done something to attract the attention of the officer' Worry less about blaming the dead victim and concentrate more on why we keep seeing this groundhog day.
Overheal wrote: » "Screw your facts and data! I have feelings." What? lol So the victim was a gangbanger now. Brilliant deflection. Clearly a member of the MS-13 ISIS branch of the NAZI party.
bewareofthedog wrote: » You don't have facts, just a bunch of childish replies and gifs. The fbi crime statistics overwhelmingly back the police.
Overheal wrote: » Nope. "Per capita" isn't an enigmatic term. But sure, let's talk about how up until a few years ago the FBI didn't even track police involved deaths. So of course their lack of data may be confused by people like you for 'support'
Deleted User wrote: » It's mad that no matter how many black people are shot and killed by police the same names are always here to tell us how it wasn't a racist incident and it was the victim that was in the wrong.
bewareofthedog wrote: » I read the first few points in that article and gave up, how can it be racist profiling if crime is strife in poor black neighbourhoods.
yourdeadwright wrote: » Isn't it strange when white guys are killed and shot by cops there is nobody telling us about it ?
Overheal wrote: » Name one? An incident where a white suspect was blown away by cops for temporary tags or something?
Overheal wrote: » Too scared of a black man to take her eyes off him to check 'oh this isn't a tazer?'