downcow wrote: » Probably the same reason you said that he moved away from it when he became moderate. We were both wrong. I have admitted I was wrong but our resident republican (surprise surprise) can never admit wrong.
Tell me how wrote: » You probably wouldn't be alone. But, iirc, the GFA calls for specific exploration of how our Union heritage would be acknowledged and celebrated within a new UI. One thing we have seen with Brexit, is just how problematic things are if left until a decision has been made before discussing such things. Some days I think Brexit itself has delayed any serious talk of a UI for at least a generation, but then when I see things like what is going on in the north as a consequence of Brexit, I think it might have moved it forward. There's another thread on here about a UI, it's probably bringing this discussion too far off topic to go in to it much further here.
schmittel wrote: » Do we really want this? If the price of a UI is giving up our national flag and national anthem, and whatever else about our national identity and culture triggers Unionists, is it a price worth paying? I am not convinced it is. I am certain that if the price includes some sort of all island power sharing agreement with the DUP sitting at cabinet irrespective of their vote numbers, then that is far too high a price for me to stomach.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Unionists will have to stand for election like everyone else.
Tpcl20 wrote: » Jesus christ they brought out the water cannons the minute the Nationalists came out with a few stones. The loyalists have been there for a week setting shyte alight and nothing but as soon as a few from the other side appear it's the literal big guns. Disgusting.
10000maniacs wrote: » I wonder why Unionists are so agitated? Could it be something to do with this? This graph is based on the 2011 NI census. If you follow the trend 10 years on to the 2021 census which happened last week (has not been published yet), a united Ireland must be within grasp at this stage.
6 wrote: » Surprised so many identify as religious. Saying that, the same happens here too, but the people don't actually practice, they were just baptised(or whatever the equivalent) into it.
BanditLuke wrote: » Go home loyalists. You are wanted or welcome in our country anymore.
10000maniacs wrote: » Up there, religion is more of a badge than a spiritual thing to many.
Del.Monte wrote: » While religion generally defines what tribe you belong to in Northern Ireland it is not the full picture and assuming all RCs are Republicans and all Protestants are Unionists would be an over simplification. Simply outbreeding the Protestant population does not equal a United Ireland. Anyway, despite what some on here would try to push, a United Ireland with a significant pro-Union rump would not exactly be a recipe for harmony into the future.
onrail wrote: » Indeed. I filled in my census form as Catholic for me, my wife and son despite being agnostic at best. Also said I was an Irish speaker despite not speaking a word past leaving cert. Mates did the same
Del.Monte wrote: » Why, especially the language thing?
downcow wrote: » No doubt. Republicans never admit wrongdoing eg story funeral and Francie above
6 wrote: » Off topic slightly, but with the baptism barrier now gone the Catholic stranglehold on religion in Ireland will fall off a cliff. Census's in the not so distant future will reflect this. A lot of kids growing up now as non religious.
maebee wrote: » I'm not a Sinn Féin supporter but they did apologise:-https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/bobby-storey-funeral-sinn-feins-20304528
batman75 wrote: » Boris Johnson has a lot to answer for. A lot of the rioting from Loyalists is I think panic. They are realising maybe for the first time ever that England doesn't give a hoot about them. Johnson had to know that leaving the EU was going to put NI in a tricky position. All the more so because NI voted to remain. Leaving the EU meant a trade border of some description. I don't think the Unionist politicians had the wherewithal to understand what hitching their wagon to the brexit horse would entail. I'm genuinely worried as to where this all goes. It's small scale at the minute compared to the dark days of the 80s and 90s which I remember growing up. I don't have much confidence in the political figures on either side to guide NI through these tricky waters. I see O'Neill as a puppet for Adams and Foster is too entrenched in Unionism to be a true leader of the people in NI.
downcow wrote: » The did not accept any wrongdoing