Frank Bullitt wrote: » Poor effort.
Mrtm17 wrote: » Anybody booked flights etc for any races this year had planned on going to my first one last year, could end up the same this year who knows
Jordan 199 wrote: » I'm reading some special features on the motorsport.com website. Very good article about when Kimi joined Sauber in 2001 and what it meant for his then team-mate Nick Heidfeld.
recyclebin wrote: » Seems like an awful long time between first and second race. I guess we got spoiled last season when the season got started, it felt like the next race always came thick and fast. The three week break will probably give teams time to develop and iron out issues from Bahrain. Mercedes will probably benefit most. The bigger teams say they have let off staff to meet the budget cap so will that effect development. Seems a shame when the drivers salary isn't included in the budget cap. Would make it more interesting.
OSI wrote: » Not exactly F1's fault. The Australian GP was supposed to be the week before Bahrain and the Chinese GP this weekend. Not really sure what they're supposed to do when the races are postponed at pretty short notice.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Ah, F1 never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. They had Drive to Survive which generated great interest amongst potential f1 fans, and then a great opening race (which would normally have been a very boring race in Melbourne) and then a three week gap to allow all those potential new fans to forget about it and lose track of when the next race will be.
Basil3 wrote: » They really have done well with DTS. I know a couple of girls in their mid-twenties who are mad into F1 now because of it. That said, I think they're more into the drama that comes with the show rather than the actual racing. One of them thought they were watching an F1 race live last weekend, when they were actually watching a replay of an F2 race
eviltimeban wrote: » Even I, an F1 fan since the 80s, struggle to pay attention over a full race length. So for new fans it must be harder. That's where highlights shows are a good idea!
mickdw wrote: » Ive never yet seen an f1 highlights package that worked in terms of telling the real story of a race.
Charlie-Bravo wrote: » So much can happen in a race as we know...and the timeline is quite important as to how the end result comes about. It'll be difficult for any broadcaster to convey the overall picture of events when they are not permitted to show more than 50% of the race coverage!
LollipopJimmy wrote: » The Hulk has joined Aston Martin, bit more pressure on Seb now
quokula wrote: » Not really, he was already their de facto reserve since last year. It's incredible to see the desperation some people have to write off Vettel on the basis of a single race where he couldn't do a qualifying lap because Mazepin spun in front of him meaning he had to race from the very back of the grid in an unfamiliar car that had broken down repeatedly in both testing and practice before he got any mileage in. You could just as easily write Alonso off for getting a plastic bag stuck in his vent. There are plenty of races ahead.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » Vettel is on a run of poor form for some time now, he's been a busted flush for a while.
muckwarrior wrote: » Vettel ran into another car and blamed the other driver. If anything, you could say he's back on form :pac:
duploelabs wrote: » Depending on who had the racing line can dictate who was at fault, so potentially the car in front was in the wrong