Cal4567 wrote: » I haven’t posted here for some time. On the social housing side there is good news. Numbers in need of housing are down to around 60-70k from a peak of around 100,000. The cost though in getting to this point has been enormous. Some of us are just beginning to understand this now. Yes, posters are right. Government have been kneejerked and panicked into this by public outrage/media comments/the opposition. We were much worse off than other countries due to not having a social housing programme from the time of the financial crash and we’ve been playing catch up ever since. We’ve had population increases as well to boot, year on year up until Covid. Like everywhere else, and why should Ireland be any different, the well documented reasons around affordability has pushed home ownership away from many. Put all these points together, as they’ve all surfaced at the same time. Believe me as I have skin in the game, although not directly. The FG policy of Rebuilding Ireland, 2016, was a calling card to every two bit financial property chancer and ‘entrepreneur’, referred to by another poster as akin to investing in a government bond. The social housing leasing model, in existence post crash, was dusted down and given a new lease of life. i.e. made more attractive to the investor. The initial leasing model was I believe introduced around a decade back to meet two ends. Many of Ireland’s property owning class (due entirely to gorging off the fat that was the Celtic Tiger) suddenly found themselves, after the Crash, with 2,3 or even more properties lying empty and unable to meet mortgage payments. The State had also stopped building any new social housing. A bright spark in the Dept. of Finance, Housing, whatever (who knows, they may have been themselves as much indebted) put these two issues together. In no time at all, sometimes the various offices of State can move surprisingly quickly when it needs to, mostly small time landlords had a safety net and thus leasing of social housing was spawned. It has now morphed into this large scale option following FG’s cry to the private enterprise world to help get it out of its crisis. That’s enough for one message. I will come back tomorrow on what has gone on since 2016. It’s basically more kneejerking and panicking.
MacronvFrugals wrote: » Hire Plunkett Homes Ltd and you'll be grand!Council Both Refused and Gave Permission for Francis Street Building to Be Torn Down https://dublininquirer.com/2021/03/31/council-both-refused-and-gave-permission-for-francis-street-building-to-be-torn-down
PropQueries wrote: » I don’t believe my generation ever had to deal with such an unfair and in my mind immoral situation IMO
Cyrus wrote: » sorry im not sure i understand you? are you saying (and sorry to anyone who lives in darndale im stereotyping) the best people live in somewhere like darndale and hence youd rather live there than blackrock? i think blackrock has lost a little of its charm but its still up there as one of dublins nicer suburbs.
mcsean2163 wrote: » Yes, exactly that. The likes of a former boss that stopped paying my wages and those of my colleagues, strung us along and then walked leaving suppliers and employees unpaid living in a Foxrock mansion, driving a Mercedes and still with his holiday home in Portugal. Versus I live in Dublin 8 near ballyfermot and some of the people I know would give you there last penny. There's some great people in Blackrock but in general the focus is on material stuff, hierarchy, cars, etc. and if there anything like some of the rich families I know, they're psychopaths. Would hate to bring up kids in Blackrock where fashion and postcode are more valued than friendship and family.
DataDude wrote: » I think you're generalizing Blackrock slightly. The vast majority who live there are hard working middle/upper middle class people. Not all like your former boss...and even if he's a terrible person, I suspect he isn't the worst neighbor in the world. You can always just ignore him - people pay the premium to avoid neighbors that you can't ignore!
Pelezico wrote: » Talk about stereotypes. The Ballyfermot people are salt of the earth but Foxrock people dont value their kids. Nonsense from start to finish and must be called out.
MacronvFrugals wrote: » Reminds me of our old neighbour's who won the lotto and moved to Shrewsbury road, the wife cracked up when it dawned on her the whole road was "full of crooks" they soon sold up and moved abroad.
Cuddlesworth wrote: » Thats a interesting question, statistics are here. I don't the way the figures are presented, eg HAP is a carry over figure, while builds and leasing are presented as additions not totals as far as I can see. Its confusing to me.
Hubertj wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/new-to-market/sandymount-victorian-for-3-5m-is-an-affair-to-remember-1.4529047 This is a very nice gaff but I’m struggling to understand the €3.5m prices when compared to other properties in that range. Seems very high. I like Sandymount but 1 thing really annoys me about it - getting stuck at the rail crosssing travelling in and out when the Dart passes.
Investment firm RoundShield Partners has received commitments of more than €200 million in a first close of a new Irish residential real estate fund with debt advisory group New Beginning. New Beginning, which is led by barrister and debt adviser Ross Maguire, first partnered with RoundShield for the Irish Social Housing Fund in 2018, with the latter initially promising up to €50 million for properties that are let to local authorities under 25-year leases.
awec wrote: » Interesting piece: https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2021/0408/1208596-european-house-prices/ Irish house prices have risen in line with the EU average since 2010, but rental increases are vastly higher.
schmittel wrote: » Are house prices really up just 28.6% since 2010? Feels like a lot more.
awec wrote: » I don't know to be honest, it does sound a bit low and there may be some strange corner case data involved. But it's from EuroStat, so their data must be at least valid and presumably unbiased.
schmittel wrote: » I guess they were still falling 2010 through 2013 so maybe 30 odd percent rise is plausible since 2010.
schmittel wrote: I guess they were still falling 2010 through 2013 so maybe 30 odd percent rise is plausible since 2010.
DataDude wrote: » Yeah you're right, CSO has it that it fell a further 28% from 2010 to 2012. So a 77% rise from the bottom but only up 27% from 2010...oh take me back to 2012, would have been great fun!
Browney7 wrote: » https://www.daft.ie/for-sale/terraced-house-67-richmond-road-drumcondra-dublin-3/3150250 This house is listed at 650k (very aspirational) and sold for just over 200k in late 2013 (spent money on it presumably in that time also) so high demand areas are likely up a lot more. Didn't the market hit the trough in 2012?
Ush1 wrote: » Yeah not sure it's worth that but lovely house now in fairness.