StupidLikeAFox wrote: » Conor Murphy knows a lot more about this murder than he is telling people - he is protecting his old comrades. I think thats enough for people to make a judgement on the man.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Who has said in the PSNI or Gardai what 'information' he has given? Links please? 'Withholding information' is a chargeable offence, if he is withholding information WHY hasn't he been charged. In short - is this trial by internet again? Murphy nor anyone else is not duty bound to reveal info just to satisfy boardsies or the general public.
Breege Quinn said Murphy must apologise for his comments on national TV and that he should also go to the PSNI and the Garda and give the names of the IRA people in Cullyhanna that she believes are behind the killing. On Wednesday afternoon, Sinn Féin issued a statement in which Murphy said he “very much” regrets the remarks and he withdrew them “unreservedly”. Murphy also repeated the apology on RTÉ television but declined to explain what information he had received from the IRA.
RandomName2 wrote: » Here you gohttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/who-was-paul-quinn-and-why-has-his-murder-become-an-election-issue-1.4162636
piplip87 wrote: » I see SF supporters are going after Stephen Nolan for flaming sectarian tensions. I wonder will they go after some of their own TDS for the up the RA, Toicfaidh ar la comments........
RandomName2 wrote: » Insignificant? Well I think it's important to remember that Conor Murphy will not name the IRA members he talked to about the abduction, torture, and murder of Paul Quinn. His hands were so badly mutilated that his family couldn't put rosary beads in them. This isn't ancient history. Conor Murphy is currently an MLA in Sinn Fein and asked his buddies in the IRA (Murphy was formerly a member) about information relating to Paul Quinn's torture and murder. Murphy has assured us that the IRA had nothing to do with it and that Quinn was a criminal who got what was coming to him. He will not disclose any additional information. Though eventually pressured into withdrawing his statement saying that Paul Quinn was a criminal, he still refuses to name the IRA members he talked to about the murder. That was a cross-border abduction and murder by a group of 8-10 people, from a republican area, which the victim's family firmly believe was related to the IRA. I think it is important to remember that Murphy says that the IRA are not guilty. Some people won't find it important though.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Who has said in the PSNI or Gardai what 'information' he has given? Links please? 'Withholding information' is a chargeable offence, if he is withholding information WHY hasn't he been charged. In short - is this trial by internet again? Murphy nor anyone else is not duty bound to reveal info just to satisfy boardsies or the general public. Again, the independent monitoring body set up by the two sovereign governments have very clearly said the 'IRA' was not involved. How come they are not in the dock too?
FrancieBrady wrote: » The Irish Times is many things but it isn't an 'official source'. If Murphy is withholding information vital to the prosecution he can be charged with an offence. He hasn't, which tells this democrat everything I need to know about the usefulness (to the PSNI or DPP) of whatever info he has.
Fionn1952 wrote: » Great, and how do you think that taking pops and misrepresenting a total non-story based on a twitter post asking Revolut why they're asking questions about pre-teebs helps to shine a light on that?
RandomName2 wrote: » You are just trying to distract when the real issue is that Murphy has information gleaned from his buddies in the IRA that he refuses to disclose to Quinn's family, the police, or the public at large. Sorry I hadn't actually seen the specific thing you'd replied to. You're right. Focusing on nonsense is actually more useful to SF than anything else; they can claim to be subject to a witch hunt (over things that are themselves quite trivial). When the accusations are inaccurate it undermines genuine criticism.
Deleted User wrote: » It is chilling to think that senior members of a political party with eyes for Government have information on the savage torture and murder of a young citizen of this country. A young man who got on the wrong side of the PIRA heavies operating up at the border, and had every bone in his body below his neck broken during his torture in a shed. The brutality of that.https://sluggerotoole.com/2007/11/12/we-cannot-allow-this-to-be-brushed-under-the-carpet/ #notanormalparty
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » I see SF are supporting the unions and calling for teachers to receive the vaccination ahead of the most vulnerable. Is there any bandwagon they won't jump on?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Not capturing the public mood on that one I’m afraid.
rdwight wrote: » Sinn Fein have been all in favour of following the scientific advice during the pandemic. Unless of course there's a republican funeral-cum-rally to attend or it's a choice between science and populism. They may actually have misjudged the popular mood on this one but they'll still be happy to have curried favour in with the teachers' unions.
markodaly wrote: » Did anyone listen to the SF education spokesperson on the radio earlier? Talking with forked tongues. They support NIAC and the new science age-based approach to vaccines BUT they also want the old system as well..... classic SF... ask for butter and salt. SF have made a huge error here and they should be roasted for their populist messaging.
Fann Linn wrote: » Do you think the Gardai should be vaccinated as a unit working on the front line?
RandomName2 wrote: » You are just trying to distract when the real issue is that Murphy has information gleaned from his buddies in the IRA that he refuses to disclose to Quinn's family, the police, or the public at large.
wicklowstevo wrote: » I wonder what sf stance on vaccinations for Gardai is?
afro man wrote: » Its really laughable at this stage people asking for SF Stance on Gardaí Vaccinations … We have 3 Political parties running the country at the moment who have made a complete [EMAIL="B@llix"]B@llix[/EMAIL] of Vaccination roll out promising certain sections would be prioritized and then changing there minds .. We or the Media at least should be addressing these questions to them. Personally I think the Gardaí should be high on list of Vaccinations.. what is your stance Wicklowstevo
maccored wrote: » he should go to the guards and report the people someone else thinks done it. yeah - really makes sense that does.
wicklowstevo wrote: » "but declined to explain what information he had received from the IRA" this is the relevant part of the quote I think you ll find