fearanphoist wrote: » Maybe and its a fair point but then if you had further context, its in walking distance and now we have to drive 25 minutes each way, 6 times a day ( at least for next 4 years as we have 3 daughters ) to the next choice of school for the next 12 years on a mistake that could have been avoided. Yes life is harsh of course , but people need to own up to their actions. I wouldn't need to go to court if the appeal process considered my argument but it cant because it wasn't designed this way , court is the only way to deal with anything that the school does incorrectly outside of the admission policy. Only my opinion but the power still resides with the school and the departments appeal process only factors in the admission policy , which isn't always 100% correct but it doesn't matter to them. If a school wants to treat you unfairly outside of this, we go back to pre 2000's of 100% power to the schools.
fearanphoist wrote: » Hi, criteria 3 was if you had a brother/sister there before criteria 4 is age i.e oldest in Q "What grounds was the decision not to offer your child a place unreasonable? - they didnt each parent a fair opportunity , they said to the department and myself that they informed everyone together at the end - this is lies and cost us a place.
fearanphoist wrote: » I dont know where you are getting the lie and fraud part from ........... please this is nothing to do with what I am taking about . I dont believe other parents lied they just got the time to probe further into the new form, some parents up to 2 weeks before closing. Its about fairness . so if all parents got the same chance and time to fill in the form thats all i am saying . If everyone got the inside track on the question so be it, it goes to the next criteria etc. then its fair. that last point is way off what I am saying here.
GAAcailin wrote: » HI, So you are saying that the School has awarded places to children that are not native speakers because their parents have 'lied' on the form and stated that they are? Can you not contact the School and make them aware of this. It seems odd, my kids attend a local Gaelscoil and when a Parent/Guardian states on the Application form that they are raising the children through Irish, unless the Parents are 'known' to the school they will follow up with a phone call etc and check this out. Our criteria is as below: 1. Siblings of children currently in the school or who have attended the school in the past. 2. Children of current staff members in the school. 3. Children who are being raised through Irish i.e. Irish is the primary language of communication in the family. (appropriate evidence may be provided by applicant) 4. Children in the area according to the waiting list. Its still early days and places may be freed up over the coming months; many families in my area accept places in multiple schools and spend months deliberating. Its very unfair as others are left with no school place until the last minute
killbillvol2 wrote: » .... The other thing that struck me was that teachers in the naoinra had advised some parents to tick yes. That would logically suggest to me that, firstly, those children were attending the naoinra and, secondly, that the teachers there thought they had enough fluency to satisfy the school's criteria...
ForestFire wrote: » What does Fluence in Irish mean for a 4/5 yo child? Is there a test to determine this? The reason I ask is that, I think, this question is very subjective, especially at this age. Going to a Naoínra, on its own, does not mean your child is anywhere near fluent. Our 7yo took this exact route and is now in a Gaelscoil, but she was not fluent in Irish at the time, far from it. We were told she will be fluent buy the time she leaves primary, though! (And being fluent was not a criteria for us 3 years ago). The only way a 5yo child can really be fluent, is if they are brought up with Irish as their first language, and unless this school in in a gaeltacht or there is an influx of Irish speaking parent in this area, are all the other children really fluent in Irish, or just have the basics, taught from a young age, and enough for parents to tick that box?? Have all children that were accepted, confirmed to be fluent? If it is evident, that they are not fluent, when the school year starts, what happens then? I mean, if this is the second criteria on the form, they should have some way to validate it? But also what is the goal of the Gaelscoils anyway? (Wider issues below) Our Gaelscoil has many children from immigrant families, including Africans, and some of these children are some of the best speakers of the language now (4 children in one family we know), having had the chance to attend the Gaelscoil. Isn't the point of the Gaelscoil to promote the language, to the wider community and to extend it use, to those who cannot learn it fully at home? Being fluent as an entry criteria kind of defeats this purpose, and possible restricts access, for a lot of irish families and other communities that what their children to learn. If the child is really fluent, and will continue home life, fully through Irish, is there a even a need to attend a primary Gaelscoil?
ForestFire wrote: » (Warning...Just Slightly off topic and probable little help to the OP at this stage) This is from an article in 2017 at the bottom of this post....so I wonder what has happened since then.... Is it due to there success that they are so much more popular? Do we have many more parents teaching their children Irish now, from younger ages? Again what is now the purpose of the Gaelscoileanna? Are they now a victim of their own success((or the Kids)? Do we need to have many more opened, to support the growing demand, and do we have the teachers to support this. In a way it's a good thing, I suppose that they are so popular now, but also they seem to be becoming more exclusive at the same time, which is ashame."Entry criteria Ó hÉadhra also says the issue of schools listing entry criteria is down to a lack of places, and that the numbers of places being reserved for children from Irish-speaking backgrounds is minuscule. “The percentage of place being reserved for children raised through the medium of Irish is tiny, 3 per cent at most. It is not a case that across the board children are being denied places because they or their parents don’t have Irish.”Ó hÉadhra says it is not in the interests of Gaelscoileanna to make their schools more niche or discourage those from non-Irish speaking backgrounds as they want to promote Gaelscoileanna. “If we weren’t supporting families who have not raised their children through Irish, it would raise serious questions about what we are doing,” he adds. "https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/why-is-it-so-hard-to-get-a-place-in-a-gaelscoil-1.2984851
jlm29 wrote: » I’d row in on this and say I don’t see the major attraction of a Gaelscoil over a non-Gaelscoil. I wouldn’t be driving 25 min out of my way 6 times a day to send my child to one.
banie01 wrote: » If I was a Gaelgoir I could certainly see the benefit. IIRC the 2 of the top 5 secondary schools in my area are Gael Cholaiste and one of those is the top rated secondary in the country. There is always the argument to be made that teaching wholly in Irish also imparts a greater affinity/ability in other languages too. There is the cultural benefit. On top of all that though some would definitely argue that they are exclusionary "Irish only" spaces by inference at the very least, aswell as aspirationally elitist.