Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Karma...https://twitter.com/BBCMarkSimpson/status/1378652447246274561
Peintre Celebre wrote: » Watched the video of your man going on fire about a dozen times today. I hope he is permanently disfigured. Good enough for him
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » https://twitter.com/DUPleader/status/1378641497474670595 A bit backward really.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Tit for tat as usual up there
kravmaga wrote: » Or another angle/ take on the rioting, scum will be scum. The PSNI are bearing the brunt of feral teenagers throwing petrol bombs and missiles (stones, bricks, ) etc. Its plain and nasty angry youths ,anti- social behaviour, they are probably organising on some sort of social media app/ platform. Certainly not good PR Belfast or Northern Ireland as its all over the media in UK and ROI. Looks like a scene from a warzone. Not sure what they are trying to achieve. A good blast from a water cannon might do the rioters no harm.https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0404/1207838-northern-ireland-violence/
RandomViewer wrote: » Northern water cannon always had the pressure turned down, used to see European riots where the water cannon would send the guy bouncing down the road ,
banie01 wrote: » T The GFA and the EU's stance of supporting no border on the island of Ireland and that any EU external border would not be implemented between N.I and ROU was clear from 2016.
Bambi wrote: » Who was it announced that they were going to trigger Article 16 and impose a hard border on the Island of Ireland? I'll give you a clue: It wasnt the Brits.
obi604 wrote: » Apologies, haven’t really looked at news in a few days. What are the Belfast riots about?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Eh, it wasn't going to impose a hard border it was going to limit vital exports to the UK. How's the whole pro-Brexit pro-Irexit thing coming along? Have you enough for a game of 5-a-side yet?
igCorcaigh wrote: » Loyalist resistance to the NI protocol mainly, and people are also angry about the police dropping the investigation of Covid rules being broken last summer at the SF members who went to the funeral.
Zebra3 wrote: » People who went to the funeral or those who stood outside in the open air for a short period of time?
igCorcaigh wrote: » I don't know.
Zebra3 wrote: » You don’t know? You’re the one making claims.
funkey_monkey wrote: » Imagine being fined £1,000 for reading the Irish News. Should have been £2,000 :pac:
Bambi wrote: » Who'd be in favour of Irexit? if you're going to keep on attacking the poster rather than the post you'd want improve your aim
briany wrote: » Fining drug dealers I wouldn't mind, if A) they're genuinely dealing drugs and Loyalist gangs aren't also dealing drugs and attempting to intimidate competition to their business. The thing of fining people for reading Irish news is, if true, completely ludicrous and smacks of insecurity and desperation.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Art 16 is a perfectly legal function of the protocol. We in the EU ****ed up intimating that we would use it. We in the EU very quickly sorted it out.
Bambi wrote: » What do you mean by "we in the EU f***ked up? The Irish government, or any other government, knew nothing about it, most of the European Commision knew nothing about it. If by "We, in the EU" you mean a small group of people in the European Commission that appear to have been running Europe solo for the last year f***ed up, you'd be right and thats a bit of a problem. the EU has very little credibility on protecting the GFA and an open border after that little tantrum Ursula and her pals threw.