CramCycle wrote: » Apparently she says to him he shouldn't be there (I don't see it or hear it, he says it in a reply), but regardless, it is a shared space, and he is moving too fast, in particular because he can clearly see her from ages away. No ifs or buts, he is in the wrong no matter what she said.
Mc Love wrote: » He makes a good point, none of the morons will call the police and if they do, they are even bigger morons.
timmyjimmy wrote: » Another example of righttobikeit being a law onto himself. This is a shared pedestrian path in Cork:https://twitter.com/righttobikeit/status/1380600880618147842?s=20
Duckjob wrote: » "Bike lane". It's not a bike lane through the crossing. There's no clear deliniation for bike/pedestrians there, nor does there need to be. A bit of basic cop on tells you when you're going across a crossing you'll be mixing more closely with people on foot so you just need to slow down a bit.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » The ethical dilemmas of driver shaming
AndrewJRenko wrote: » The ethical dilemmas of driver shaminghttps://twitter.com/MikeyCycling/status/1381670442952495105?s=19
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Could it be possible that having words with a driver actually helps to improve driving quality?https://twitter.com/righttobikeit/status/1378021257820700675?s=19
Seve OB wrote: » Did I say that I overtake cyclists like that?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Please hand over your driving licence until you learn to overtake properly.
Seve OB wrote: » I see a driver waiting for an opportunity to pass on a tight road in one clip. In the other clip on a much wider road I see a driver taking his opportunity to pass, but cut it a bit tight in doing so.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Looks like all the predictions that someone was going to physically respond to Mikey were correct. ... Amazing how people that were in so much of a rush that they had to drive on the wrong side of the road seemingly have loads of time to hang around and debate the point.
CramCycle wrote: » "Have you not seen the viral videos" LOL, no, its a few thousand views in a city of millions a good chunk of those views are probably from Ireland at the minute. This said, it is funny how many of them persist in engaging with him, they are morons. You see the smart ones immediately pull back in, but the ones who persist, you have to wonder the mentality. They would have been through the junction. I still say if his only interest was safety though he would simply sit there and film and report. That said, luckily for him he isn't in Ireland or he would have to go to court each time of the gardai even bothered and a judge or garda would blame him for some of the incidents.
Deleted User wrote: » Has he campaigned the relevant authority to do something to prevent cars going down the right on that stretch? Seems like a no brainer with the amount of video he has there. I'd be more supportive of him if he won the battle here like that and move the war on somewhere else.
buffalo wrote: » Why is it up to him to fix the problem? There's no pleasing some people! Surely the police or LA should notice the amount of fines being issued at that junction and take action?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Has he campaigned the relevant authority to do something to prevent cars going down the right on that stretch? Seems like a no brainer with the amount of video he has there. I'd be more supportive of him if he won the battle here like that and move the war on somewhere else.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » It seems to take 1-2 years for the police/courts to process a case, based on the timing of release of videos. So he has the choice of a 1-2 year time lag for the driver to get the message, or immediate delivery of that message. I know which one is more effective. The YouTube hits are almost certain to have some degree of deterrent effect too.
Deleted User wrote: » When I was a child we had a toy called stretched armstrong. You could stretch it into all kinds of tortured shapes
CramCycle wrote: » I get the crystalline point but it's crystallising it in one person's mind. Most drivers, like cyclists are creatures of habit. If he just sat there and filmed, day in and day out, he'd have most of them off the road or fined enough they would start behaving. All that crowd might do is start behaving at that one junction. They will still misbehave elsewhere. I think it's great he is doing it but anyone who thinks he is doing it as some beacon of justice is misguided at best, it's YouTube hits and nothing else.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » 1) Most cyclists ARE motorists. 2) Most keyboard warriors ARE motorists. You're right to say that most of them probably don't drive in that location, but do you think it is reasonable to say that maybe 1% of viewers drive in that location occasionally?