Diamond_Hands wrote: » All 8 questions on the EU paper should just be on competition law for the craic.
LeagleEagle747 wrote: » How much use is reading through past papers for EU and Tort? Do the examiners tend to rehash the same answers or no? Been dying with a migraine since Friday evening so I’m just looking for anything that I can just try to learn off last minute.
nmurphy1441 wrote: » Anyone do the co ownership question in property tell me what direction they went with it???
lawgrad_ wrote: » EU Law Does anyone have sample answers for EU Law that are not Griffith - happy to swap for other materials. Fairly desperate at this stage!
Ais20 wrote: » I’m nearly sure that co-ownership question has come up a lot from past papers and from reading the examiner reports and what they said I went with discussing it in three parts, said whether it was a joint tenancy or a tenancy in common, the rights and responsibilities of co-owners and then how Gerry could terminate his co-ownership interests !
Law101 wrote: » whats wrong with Griffith? I think they're good for EU,maybe not the other ones though. please tell me I'm not wrong!!!!:(
Lallers96 wrote: » I feel physically sick of all this talk of they only mark the very first 5 answers. I typed in one box and decided to delete it but betterexams had it still marked as an answer attempted so I wrote something like "This question is appearing as answered but I have not. I have answered Q1,3,5,6, and 7" Should that cover me in this instance of only the first 5 marked. I do not want to end up being one of those very unlucky souls who had questions go missing..these are my last FE1s
ruby1998 wrote: » I did joint tenancy v tenancy in common, concluded it would be presumed JT. Then talked about severance and how it would have been severed in equity - unequal purchase price and commercial. Then I did rights of co owners and then termination of co ownership. Overall said it would’ve been a TIC and so his share would’ve passed to beneficiaries under the will/intestacy! I’m in such a bad habit of routinely checking this form lol
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Has anyone here ever not sat one of the exams they were planning to sit? Didn’t sit one of mine and feeling like a bit of a failure haha
CandyCane_81 wrote: » I wouldn’t worry about that I think it’s more if you answer 6 questions, your best 5 aren’t necessarily what you get back. I hope so anyway, I scribbled down notes for a few Qs that I didn’t delete!
milktray22 wrote: » Does that mean that better exams delete some of your answers. I answered 5 questions but for a 6th question I wrote two lines of rough notes before deciding not to continue with an attempt. Was stuck for time at end so just said yes and next to get it submitted on time
StabiloLaw wrote: » I put up here Sunday evening that I was considering not sitting Contract, and I didn't in the end. The general consensus on here was to at least try and I'd never know what might come back to me- which was greatly appreciated and thanks to everyone who were encouraging. However, at the end of the day I think we all need to listen to ourselves and know when enough is enough. I had sat three in a row last week and honestly, had a breakdown on Saturday and Sunday down to pure exhaustion. I've already passed 4 and I really should have pushed to do my final one out of 8, but at the end of the day, these exams are such a tiny tiny portion of our lives and it's not worth it if you're going to be on the brink of jumping out a window. I would encourage everyone to sit the exams as you're more than likely ready, but if you've done the same as me and thought enough is enough, DO NOT feel guilty. There's no shame in knowing that you're at your limit and taking a step back. The world will keep turning and there's always October.
BookFast wrote: » Well done for listening to yourself. I hope you're feeling a little better now and congrats on sitting the rest!
AA247 wrote: » I did the same! Bailed on an exam as I felt I’d too little covered and was taking a chance. Just panicked. Don’t know about the rest of you, but I have to say I cried when I seen what came up. I could have answered a 6th question, albeit at a push. The regret was worse than the relief! Learning from my mistake always give it a go because the reality is you only have 40 min per Q so only so much you can write. You don’t need to know everything to a tee. But here that’s me giving advice I didn’t take ha ha! It’s so much easier to bail online I found!
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Anyone leaving out rylands v fletcher for tort?
