awsah wrote: » I did a question in co ownership!!
awsah wrote: » Congratulations on finishing! Huge relief!
Legalapples wrote: » I postphoned one of mine too! Annoyed by it but the Law Society put too much pressure on us with the delayed dates of the November sitting to delayed results and rechecks - I know it’s a pandemic so they’re not competently to blame but the time frame and even uncertainty for studying for these exams have been so messed up in comparison to other sittings! Try not to beat yourself up about it and try to think of it as a positive - there’s loads of time to chill and cram for the October sitting now !
RaffRiff01 wrote: » Imagine there's no FMOG or DE tommorrow because theres no AP on Property today or 1000 PQs and just 1 essay to choose from.. I would literally cry when that happens
RebeccaM90 wrote: » Does anyone know do they grade the first 5 questions or will they grade the paper and take best 5? Totally misinterpreted an entire question
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » I was told they only mark the ones in order and don’t mark all - but that was from a girl that sat equity so maybe it was just equity - he marked the ones in turn and didn’t even look at her last one which was better
RebeccaM90 wrote: » When are the results ?
orlaghs wrote: » just out of curiosity, when you say you postponed do you mean you deferred and didnt lose your money? i asked last week and had looked it up, was under the impression that you needed a doctors note or evidence of why you wanted to defer
2020FE1 wrote: » This happened to me with EU. I ditched a question halfway through and answered question 8. I forgot to go back and delete the half attempt. When I requested my script back only the first 5 were graded.
FE1Eire wrote: » EU - I'm covering FMOS/FMOW/FMOG, Citizenship, Judicial Review, Direct/Indirect, MS Liability, Principles, Sources and Institutions (briefly) - worried after property I won't have enough since the papers are being very unpredictable, any suggestions on another I should cover other than competition law as I have never even looked at it!
eLawGirl wrote: » Could this be appealed if it turned out you didn't pass? How can they think that is appropriate
FE1_2020_ wrote: » Does anyone have access to the EU examiners report from November please ?
NewFe1 wrote: » Tbf I can understand why they would assume there was no other question answered after they have marked 5 answers. Answering 6 in these exams is very very uncommon.
Iso_123 wrote: » Have it here!
law77335255252 wrote: » I answered 6 in Constitutional. Had 5 done that I was relatively happy with and had around 20-25mins left so I decided to do the casenote Q, which I knew I could do pretty quick. If the examiner only corrects the first 5 Qs that appear, then I'll miss out on the Q I done on infectious disease which was one of my strongest Q (Knew the S v HSE 2009 case etc.). That would be pretty annoying seeing as in the written exams you can position your weakest 6th answer last, so if they only correct the first 5 it won't matter as much. But with the online system, there's no way to make you 6th weakest answer appear last. As long as I pass I don't mind at all, but I'd imagine if you were failing on your first 5 they would correct the 6th. I cannot remember seeing anywhere that you will only be graded on your first 5 but maybe I'm wrong.
eLawGirl wrote: » Absolutely, sometimes even getting the bare 5 answers down is tough! It just seems mad that they wouldn't look at the entire script. In the paper exams we write the question number on the front of the answer book so it's clear how many Qs are attempted but for online is it the case they only get a script of the first 5 questions people answer in numerical order? Having to do a data protection request then to view the script and having to pay more than the exam even costs in the first place for a recheck. Mental. If it wasn't for GDPR they wouldn't even be so quick to send us the scripts back.
Fe1user5555 wrote: » What are people leaving out for tort? I’m currently attempting to cover nearly everything but won’t have time so would be great to be able to leave a few things!
awsah wrote: » Maybe this was the reason for the high fail rate. I am worried now that I wrote topics into the question box, hopefully they don't count that as a full answer 🙈😫 in November I wrote "not attempted" in the ones I wasn't doing jusy for my own sake to make sure I didn't miss out on any but didn't do it this time!
Lawabc wrote: » What kind of question comes up on sources? I'm doing the same as you plus equality (very briefly).
Diamond_Hands wrote: » All 8 questions on the EU paper should just be on competition law for the craic.
