Fe1user5555 wrote: » Has anyone here ever not sat one of the exams they were planning to sit? Didn’t sit one of mine and feeling like a bit of a failure haha
corbrian1998 wrote: » Should I be covered for EU with General Principles, Insitutions, FMOG, FMOW/Equality/EU Citizenship, Judicial Review and DE/MSL. I’m not doing equivalence and practical possibility or free movement of services and establishment.
Diamond_Hands wrote: » Case law for effectiveness: Van Colsen, Marleasing,? Case law for equivalence???
corbrian1998 wrote: » I didn’t sit one of mine this sitting either. I was meant to sit 4 but I only did three I decided not to do it v last minute and I feel the exact same.
Fe1user5555 wrote: » I’m in the same position! I feel like I don’t deserve to celebrate when I’m finished my exams because I didn’t sit the 4th
Law101 wrote: » same here too, equivalence and practical possibility came up in November! so did the history of charter of fundamental rights. So I'm not doing the charter, just the side of fundamental rights.. if that makes sense lol
Katniss1998 wrote: » Just out of the property exam, bit annoyed at myself as I was only able to do four and a half questions. I studied: Finding Adverse Possession Succession Easements Family Property Coownership The questions on the paper were Essay on Land Registration Essay on Landlord and Tenant Law One other thing Essay on Extrinsic Evidence in Succession Problem question on formalities of a will Problem question on coownership Problem question on family home protection act Multiple choice do 2 of 3- Bare licence, contractual licences, commerientes I was surprised that there was no finding, adverse possession or easements on the paper. Especially after I spent so long getting my head around easements. Do you think I could pass with four decent questions and half of the last question? i could only do commorientes.
flepetch wrote: » i'm in the exact same boat as you. majorly pissed off at myself and the examiner tbh. hoping 4.5 questions will get me over the line!
awsah wrote: » it seems to me that the examiners are under some sort of illusion that we have it easier this year and they have decided to make the exams harder rather than giving us a break in a pandemic! AP not showing up, for what the first time ever!! the only thing that will save me in this is if that first question was on priorpratry estoppel as I had not a notion what it was but didnt have the other essays studied!
Niamh_G wrote: » What was the topic for the question of Mary and the interest in land?
Ais20 wrote: » Seems like a lot of us only got 4.5, honestly was shocked but counting my blessings I looked at family property!!
Al1501 wrote: » I had to really waffle that last question. I hope she'll accept whatever I pulled out of my head on proprietary estoppel using whatever I half-remembered from contract last November. That was a bit of a mess, wasn't it?
CandyCane_81 wrote: » I checked my exam papers, the nearest I could find for that estoppel Q was 2012!
awsah wrote: » Why even have that as a topic on 3 different exams, do solicitors really deal with it that much that we need to learn it 3 times! Only that I did equity and contract this sitting I was able to answer it
fe1time wrote: » I must be one of the few who liked the paper. I had studied Licences, AP, Co-ownership, Family property, Succession, Easements and Mortgages. I was a bit miffed that there was no AP or easements but lucky in that I did a bit on proprietary estoppel yesterday. I actually did 6 questions!
