TomTomTim wrote: » I don't think anyone here has ever even argued against skilled immigration, most are for it. So we're once again arguing against a position that none of us hold.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm pretty sure that RobbieTheRobber raised this point before, and we all chipped in to discuss it. I suspect he's just twisting tails. It's not as if this hasn't been covered many times already.
Eric Cartman wrote: » it feels like we're going round in circles , the question 'what are the benefits to us of unskilled / non EU migration' still have not been answered. A glib remark or two about diversity of takeaways seems to be all that can be mustered. If we banned the talk about doctors/engineers who have always been welcome and the talk of food, the positive side of this argument is basically gone.
Strumms wrote: » Unskilled is basically meaning they are coming to avail of opportunities, financial, security, education, quality of life, without the ability or interest or intent to pay back or add a tangible contribution to life here..
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Of course that's what I mean. What did you think I was referring to? Diversity of opinion was it? Its too far away from the m1. It wouldn't suit. Plus the traffic is very slow I also said I didn't know if it causes any problems because I don't live there. You left that bit out.
Strumms wrote: » I agree, but many people just want an open door free for all for anybody not just having quite such a good time of it in their homeland... Of course many of these people are projecting these ideas with the simple goal of attempting to drive down labour costs and denying people here the ability to earn a fair wage in respect of their qualifications, experience and skillsets... More people prepared to work for less ? We have to match or struggle getting hired.. Gotta resist that shît of being sold down the river.
Esho wrote: » Multiculturalism suits the whole globalisation agenda when it comes to skilled migration. An Indian pal of mine is on really bad money for an IT professional, no Irish person would do his job for that money. We've already been sold down the river-.
THE number of people willing to move here to work is not going to hit levels seen during the last boom and will not keep wages down, economists at the Central Bank are forecasting.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Who is advocating for an open door free for all in this thread?
Deleted User wrote: » I dunno. I keep coming back to this because, well, I'm a teacher. I've taught privately and through State universities, and have done a fair bit of corporate training too. My beef with unskilled labor comes down to two simple points. Employment and education. For employment, we need to have available placements to provide for these unskilled migrants, with that employment providing a reasonable standard of living.. so that they can avail of training opportunities to upskill them to be able to do better, and higher paid work... but unskilled labor tends to be labor/time intensive, so it's hard for them to avail of educational opportunities, due to the modern nature of Ireland's economy, they would need to obtain a relatively high standard (compared to their past experience), while also working and paying their costs. Then, there's the problem with education.. Ireland's formal education is pretty decent but it's not swimming in resources, and extra space available. Most Universities are up to their eyes in debt (of some sort) for expansion of their facilities, and the revenue for students has generally dropped, especially with lost revenue from the profitable foreign student market (due to covid, and other considerations). I could go on, but there's little point. It comes back to these two points for me, with regards to unskilled labor. How do we educate them with the resources we have available (resources which were made available while Ireland's economy was doing quite well....), considering there are serious limitations on our ability to upskill our own unemployed, or even to provide profitable educational qualifications for graduates.. Too many educational services in Ireland are outdated, or aimed solely at providing a piece of paper, than providing marketable skills. The area of multiculturalism, immigration, etc.. it all comes back to the practicalities for me. If the money tree existed, and we had unlimited resources, then, I'd be more favorable towards most kinds of immigration.. but Ireland isn't in such a position. No valuable natural resources. None. A small country with a relatively low population. An economy built around technology, and as such, decent formal education. And since we're part of the EU (and Ireland has always been a Nanny State), everything is regulated. It's the lack of consideration for the practicalities that bothers me. Where do we find employment for all these migrants? How do we afford to provide State supports to those who cannot make enough money to live? How do we improve our educational service with less resources available, while also dealing with increased demand (and new problems considering language difficulties, and other issues)... ? And on, and on.. and on. I could list dozens on dozens of likely issues here, which I have seen no sign of people wanting to address, and resolve. Nah. It'll be grand. It'll sort itself out.. Ireland's a magical place.
Turquoise Hexagon Sun wrote: » I'm all for immigration.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » Why?
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Man living in China argues about immigrants and calls Ireland a nanny state
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Do you have a problem with Irish emigrants in other countries?
Wibbs wrote: » And again with the same dubious comparison that falls on its arse under the most cursory of investigations. Oh and for the record; I do indeed have a problem with any Irish who are illegals in other nations like the US.
Wibbs wrote: » Man who through the proper channels legally emigrated to China with skills that country judged it needed and supports himself without recourse to the state and taxpayers(of which he is one) of China, and the moment the same China judges he is not on the positive side of their nation's balance sheet will be asked to leave. I know this is a variation of the old storied nonsense of "well the Irish were immigrants too" trope, but the differences are perfectly clear.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » That's for other Countries to decide. How about my question?
Deleted User wrote: » I only know one person who went to America as an illegal, they knew if they were caught they would be deported as it should be. I never heard anyone saying that they should be allowed to stay if caught. The attitude from everyone was if your caught, tough sh*t, deal with the consequences Politicians and NGO's using illegal irish in America to justify illegal immigration in Ireland is just an attempt to force through amnesty here, which unfortunately is working.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » What dubious comparison? The word immigrant doesn't of itself identify legal or illegal status immigrants the poster I replied to has clearly an issue with immigration to Ireland and has not stated that is only a problem with illegal migration. So it is a valid question! :rolleyes:
Well I dont know that he has fulfilled all the legal obligations to be in China do I. For all I know he could well be in breach of local laws. For example most foreigners in China use a VPN to access web services outside of China and without a license this would be illegal. Now we wouldn't want to support immigrants committing illegal activity would we.
As for decrying Ireland a Nanny state well then comparing it to the country he moved is valid. Would you say Ireland is more or less a nanny state than China Wibbs?
Wibbs wrote: » Roll your eyes all you wish, but it's the conflation - and well you know it - of illegal and legal migration in the debate around multicultural Europe. What percentage of non EU migrants over the last 20 years came here through direct legal means for employment or education? Is it the majority? It is not. Quite the percentage came and got residence here because of the birthright passport loophole, of which well over 90% of whom wouldn't be allowed in or to stay today after it was closed. What percentage of legal non EU migrants are in receipt of social welfare and housing? Is it the majority? It is not. Accessing a VPN(as most locals do too) Versus a lifetime of social welfare and increasing social problems. Yeah totally comparable. Loving the "well maybe he's not legal?" angle. :pac: The difference between here and places like China(and other nations in Asia) is he'd get short shrift as an illegal compared to here. He certainly wouldn't get social welfare or be in line with and even ahead of the locals for social housing. Welcome to the bottom of the barrel of your arguments. Scrapers will be provided. China is far more oppressive and clearly far more into surveillance of their peoples. On the other hand you have a ciggie in a pub so... But that's another argument.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » How about you try mine again and this time offer your opinion?
V8 Interceptor wrote: » I did. Its none of my business what other Countries do. Good luck to them. How more clear can I be?
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » This illegal activity is ok. But applying for welfare through a government agency well that's just the worst kind of thing in the world.:D
Wibbs wrote: » If you can't divine the difference between an educated and employed taxpaying legal migrant accessing a VPN and an undereducated and unemployed migrant who's never made a contribution to the host nation looking for a handout from the nation they recently entered illegally then I really don't know how to explain things to you. Though of course you well know the difference, but your argument hasn't a leg to stand on so these are all just hail mary deflections in an attempt to paper over those obvious cracks.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » So you cant form an opinion on it because its another country? Is it only illegal migration to Ireland you have a problem with, or do you consider most migration to Ireland to be abhorrent?