View wrote: » There’s a simple solution to this, namely raise the CT rate to, let’s say, 15% and “ring fence” the additional monies raised. These would be in a fund to be spent, with joint input from the MNC, either on infrastructure that would directly benefit the MNC (eg roads near its offices) or on joint university-MNC R&D programmes with the university and MNC getting to split the profits (somehow) on the fruits of any successful R&D. In both cases the MNC gains a benefit for itself from the additional taxes it would pay.
mcsean2163 wrote: » Agree. Anything at all would be good, 0.5% to 13%. It would be a move in the right direction and placate our EU neighbors a bit.
Geuze wrote: Anybody who suggest raising the CT rate should reflect on these points.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Yes we have indeed done very well from our corporation tax structures, but let's call a spade a spade, it's unfair to other countries and to our fellow citizens, it is also long term unsustainable, as corporation financial activities globally, have become systemically dangerous for all humans. We now have a situation whereby in certain economic situations, it is more beneficial to many of these corporations to engage in rent seeking, wealth extraction methods such as share buy backs etc, rather than investing in productive means, I.e. job creation. These activities only truly benefit major share holders, which in many cases is a very small percentage of the population, I.e. accelerating wealth inequality, so enough is enough, these type of activities are dangerous for all humans, including the wealthy. I was glad to see the UK go for an increase of 25%
Larbre34 wrote: » Ireland has been talked of as a "tax haven" for what 20 to 30 years now? Can't see any evidence that situation has done any reputational damage so far. Ireland has no problem attracting investment, securing beneficial borrowing rates or growing the economy in a very healthy fashion compared to the rest of the World.
mcsean2163 wrote: » Yes and not only that, at some point EU may say, no stop that and then we are really exposed.
Podge_irl wrote: » Stop what exactly?
Geuze wrote: » Given that corporate profits are already taxed twice (first by CT, then by IT if paid out as dividends, or by CGT if the share price rises), why not reduce the CT to 0%? Lower CT may boost economic growth, without any loss of revenue, as higher profits will be eventually taxed by IT/CGT.https://www.oecd.org/berlin/46391708.pdf
mcsean2163 wrote: » Stop a corporation tax rate of 12.5% that facilitates companies not paying their share of tax.
Podge_irl wrote: » As I am sure has been explained to you before, they have no power or ability to do that. It is a fantasy.
mcsean2163 wrote: » The EU have the power to put conditions on loans, see Greece. Biden pushing for 21% corporation tax.https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/biden-s-global-minimum-tax-rate-carries-big-dangers-for-ireland-1.4525075?mode=amp
Podge_irl wrote: » We don't need a loan from the EU so it doesn't really matter. There are also far more countries than just Ireland who do not want member state competency over tax rates to be centralised.
mcsean2163 wrote: » We're getting loans because we're in the EU. We're the most indebted per capita in the EU. Do you think we'll be allowed to grow our debt ever greater?
Deleted User wrote: » Is there a source for the most indebted per capita statement
[Deleted User] wrote: » Is there a source for the most indebted per capita statement
Geuze wrote: » A good place to look is the NTMA investor presentation, for data on public debt.https://www.ntma.ie/uploads/general/NTMA-Investor-Presentation-April-2021.pdf
mcsean2163 wrote: » A simple Google would have shown you multiple results or even reading back in the thread. Here it is again.https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/ireland-to-have-highest-debt-per-head-in-europe-this-year-1.4503652?mode=amp We're third in the world after US/ Japan. FFG will soon be spending a billion a year on housing rental payments, (a huge portion of that long term leases that are more expensive than house purchases), in an attempt to buy the electorate and under the guise of covid19 borrowing.https://www.thejournal.ie/factcheck-spend-rent-subsidies-social-housing-5004540-Feb2020/https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2020/1118/1178948-cso-on-haps/
mcsean2163 wrote: » Also, we've had the strictest government restrictions over the last year in EU.https://seanmcm.medium.com/how-strict-have-the-covid-19-lockdown-restrictions-been-in-ireland-22c80ea06222 We're spending money like it's water.
mcsean2163 wrote: » In case anyone wondering about the one billion figure.https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/the-plan-to-tackle-ireland-s-housing-crisis-has-failed-1.4528364?mode=amp This shift from bricks to benefits has been one of most eye-catching features of the Government’s housing policy. Spending on rent subsidies has doubled since 2016 and will be close to €1 billion this year.
Seth Brundle wrote: » Which party represented in Dáil Éireann would not have spent that money?
Seth Brundle wrote: » Providing a link to what i presume is your own blog wouldn't be considered an independent source in fairness!