blue note wrote: » 12th April would be great. I'd love to have a solid date in the diary.
ForeRight wrote: » It’s mad how socially distant lads get when it’s their round at the bar
PARlance wrote: » We all wear huge sombreros, can't get within 2m of each other.
Kiith wrote: » And this is what has probably pissed me off more then any other argument in this entire saga. "Optics" and "If golf is allowed, x needs to be allowed". Why should anything else automatically allowed because something else is. If you can show, with evidence, that an activity is not anymore of a risk then walking in the park, it should be allowed. Outdoor, non-contact activities are as low risk as can be. Yet they give people a chance to actually enjoy themselves, and allowed a lot of clubs a chance to dig themselves out of the financial hole they are in. We may need to remove water from any course though...guaranteed we all go in there :P
ForeRight wrote: » It’s not closed because it’s unsafe. It’s currently closed as if was allowed there is a domino effect behind it of industry after industry arguing their cause as they deem themselves safe also. It’s hard to draw a line in the sand as to what’s ok and what’s not without a can of worms being opened so I was always able to understand the logic of restrictions.
ForeRight wrote: » Masks are for when you can’t socially distance. If lads can’t keep 2m apart playing golf they should be barred. I know myself and my partners are always very distant. I’m usually right rough he’s usually left rough.
blackbox wrote: » Has there been any talk of wearing masks whilst playing? I'd be happy to if it meant getting out next month. .
newport2 wrote: » This. The more outdoor low-risk activities are restricted, the more indoor higher-risk events will happen. NPHET have confirmed themselves that people meeting indoors is where the cases are coming from. Make it easy for people to spend time outdoors on healthy activities. I'm expecting golf to open, but suspect they will only increase 5k to 10k, making it unavailable to a lot of people. I hope I'm wrong about this.
ForeRight wrote: » Why are people still banging the drum that golf is safe and there’s no scientific evidence of it being a lethal activity in terms of the virus? Everyone knows it’s safe, nphet, government and the dogs in the street. It’s not closed because it’s unsafe. It’s currently closed as if was allowed there is a domino effect behind it of industry after industry arguing their cause as they deem themselves safe also. It’s hard to draw a line in the sand as to what’s ok and what’s not without a can of worms being opened so I was always able to understand the logic of restrictions. However I firmly believe now is the time for an easing of these restrictions given the vaccination of the population that largely threaten the hospital system.5km in the bin now, kids play their sports, golf and tennis open, construction should open. Pubs, restaurants, gyms etc I can understand they need a while longer before opening to assess how the minor opening up affects things.
ForeRight wrote: » Why are people still banging the drum that golf is safe and there’s no scientific evidence of it being a lethal activity in terms of the virus? Everyone knows it’s safe, nphet, government and the dogs in the street.It’s not closed because it’s unsafe. It’s currently closed as if was allowed there is a domino effect behind it of industry after industry arguing their cause as they deem themselves safe also. It’s hard to draw a line in the sand as to what’s ok and what’s not without a can of worms being opened so I was always able to understand the logic of restrictions.
bustercherry wrote: » What's that got to do with my post? Plus it's not completely safe, it's deemed low risk. The only thing that is safe is staying the fcuk at home Golf is closed because we are in level 5.Everything is closed to limit the movement and interactions of people from non-essential journeys. The problem is the government need to enact policy that limits the spread/outbreaks but balance it with acceptable risk. Opening golf will have to coincide with other restrictions being lifted which in turn increases the cumulative risk (of all activities a person does) of catching or transmitting the virus not only within their own community but to other communities. I hope it opens but there is plenty of scientific evidence to back up limiting the movement of people prevents the spread from communities.
RGS wrote: » I'm not anti GAA I played the game for over 25 years and still miss the playing. But inter county is for the elite of the sport. There wont be any GAA on TV in April, so your argument about people watching is moot.
bustercherry wrote: » Does it? Have you ever competed at elite level to back this up?
At this point there would have been a full league campaign and club GAA. Also there are commercial rationals for getting inter county GAA up and running sooner.
It's completely illogical to compare elite amateur sport to club golf. I think it should and hope golf opens; but as as I pointed out using inter county GAA (non-contact) training as a reference equates to elite amateur golfers only being allowed out to practice, so they can prepare for the elite amateur comps. How many of those are you eligible for?
11521323 wrote: » I'm not clear where you stand on this but there is zero scientific evidence or rational logic to support the closure of golf courses. ~10% of the population play occasionally (which logically could be regularly now that everything else is closed) and it's completely safe (at least as safe as going to a park or for a walk on the street) Every other country on the planet have also acknowledged the above besides us if they remain closed any longer. It's farcical they were ever closed to begin with.
blue note wrote: » Allowing intercounty is entirely for the masses. The idea is that you let a couple thousand people compete under strict guidelines and hundreds of thousands will watch them on TV each week and have something to follow. But I expect as before most people here will ignore that, talk about "GAA being open" as opposed to .1% of GAA being open. It's amazing how much people can see what they want to see.
bustercherry wrote: » Does it? Have you ever competed at elite level to back this up? At this point there would have been a full league campaign and club GAA. Also there are commercial rationals for getting inter county GAA up and running sooner. It's completely illogical to compare elite amateur sport to club golf. I think it should and hope golf opens; but as as I pointed out using inter county GAA (non-contact) training as a reference equates to elite amateur golfers only being allowed out to practice, so they can prepare for the elite amateur comps. How many of those are you eligible for?
Ivefoundgod wrote: » Quick google gives me this, so 265k watched the 2019 league final, not exactly massive. https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/gaelic-games/broadcasting-pendulum-swings-back-to-gaelic-games-in-2019-1.4142313 I think even most GAA people would admit the league is of a lot less interest to a anyone outside the hardcore GAA fan. Right but I didn't actually say I expect them to pick up and resume without training. I am saying the All Ireland isn't due to start until a few months time, I'd have no issue with GAA coming back in a months time when we're further along the vaccination journey, that allows plenty of time to get back up and running with training and time to run off the All Ireland as well. I don't think there is time to run off the leagues and All Ireland to be honest and the club season looks like a write off at this stage as well IMO. Anyway I'm getting sidetracked, my point is I don't think its logical to allow inter county GAA resume but not golf or tennis, that's it.
whitefoot wrote: » Does anyone know of any other country apart from Ireland in the R&A Top 20 by quantity of courses, that could be still closed on the 12th April? I know US, Australia, England & Sotland would certainly be open by that date. Top 20 golfing countries(by no. of courses) Country United States16,752 Japan 3,169 Canada 2,633 England 2,270 Australia 1,616 Germany 1,050 France 804 Korea, Republic Of 798 Sweden 662 Scotland 614 China 599 Spain 497 Ireland 494 South Africa 489 New Zealand 418 Argentina 349 Denmark 346 Netherlands 330 Italy 321 Thailand 315