eljono wrote: » Thank you, I will give that a shot tonight. Hopefully it'll work with ChromeCast
Jordan 199 wrote: » He could always mute the sound and provide his own commentary
flazio wrote: » Drinking challenge, take a shot whenever "Sir" is used
racersedge wrote: » As cliched and irritating that Croft can be... nobody, nobody can make Legard look good!
namloc1980 wrote: » HAM BOT looking a bit ominous now.
Hijpo wrote: » Tsunoda looks like a small child in the the garage.
Dont be at yourself wrote: » Ricciardo surprisingly off the pace, as well as the Alpines. Alpha Tauri and Ferrari will fancy Q3.
afatbollix wrote: » Lads Honda said they are quitting a year out. That means they will have the engine this year and win the championship before paying for red bulls development for the next few years as an apology and not one bit of Honda on the car. Clever marketing bods in Honda....
jonerkinsella wrote: » WTF... Ads on sly F1 during qually. It's now a new low. Sky have destroyed F1. It's just like the low that was F1 on channel 4 and even worse, ITV. Fukc Ruppert Murdoch.
flazio wrote: » Bit harsh on ITV and C4 there. They don't get licence fee money so have to seek sponsorship to pay their broadcast crew. Apparently, Sky's excuse is they need to make up a shortfall owing from the shorter FP sessions on Friday.
Irishjg wrote: » Yes, I’m expecting Mazepin to be the new Maldonado of the people. He he.
LIGHTNING wrote: » Ah yes driver speculation and its only the first session in the first qualifying session of the year
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Haas probably has a big budget for crashes and repairs from the Grosjean years and it’s not going to spend itself. I always thought they Steiner went too hard on Gorsjean in Drive to Survive. He publicly humiliated him in front of the whole team on numerous occasions. And publicly bitched about how whit he was and how much he crashed. Grosjean wasn’t enjoying the jokes and was clearly embarrassed. Didn’t seem like the best way to get the most out of him.
quokula wrote: » I agree, while Steiner made for entertaining tv, it did seem like something of a toxic work environment. The car is clearly a handful, the new drivers are struggling, and they’ve gone backwards when you’d expect them to have moved forward a little with the new Ferrari power unit. I do think Grosjean and Magnussen were both very underrated and it was just impossible to show their skills in that car.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » They have explicitly said they haven’t don’t much work for this year’s car and aren’t going to upgrade the car. It’s all about 2022 for them. They might be slower than the Williams this year. They have had problems with the chassis and they don’t understand what they are. Half way through 2019 they reverted to the Melbourne spec to see if it was faster than the improvements they brought so they could isolate the problem. They never found the problem as far as I know, so they just sacked it off and focused on next year instead.
Frank Bullitt wrote: » https://the-race.com/formula-1/mercedes-has-ers-deficit-to-honda-that-reverses-recent-trend/ Seems Honda has an ERA advantage over Merc at this point.