awsah wrote: » ya I just focused more of my time on constitutional and equity and I am only now realising how much is actually in contract, but I am not going to thorw in the towel just yet! praying for some lovely questions tomorrow!
Mc96 wrote: » I don't unfortunately, even though I had put a lot of time into it, the morning of I was considering not sitting it because I honestly felt so over stretched and that I didn't actually properly know anything with there being so much to remember. I sat it in the end and a lot came back to me in the exam and I passed. I think it's one of those ones that you will just always feel totally unprepared for. My only advice is if you really feel you aren't remembering stuff just cut it down, learn 2 instead of 4 cases for a point etc. and try to push through! I really hated contract by the end so I totally understand where you're coming from!
awsah wrote: » Have you any tips on how to cram all these subjects in? I feel like I'm finding this harder that constitutional to get everything learned off!
Mc96 wrote: » If you feel you just don't have the time, then better to leave it out than send yourself into a spin trying to learn it at the expense of other topics. I sat in November and passed, I'm happy to send on my notes on it if that would help you just pm me your email address, but don't put yourself under pressure if it would be at the expense of the other topics you've concentrated on.
stav wrote: » Hey all, does anyone have any Property sample answers and/or exam reports from after 2018 that they would be willing to share? Happy to trade anything I have. Thanks a million! ☺️
Fe1user5555 wrote: » under a bit of time pressure here think I'm going to have to leave out frustration - is this completely insane
FE1new wrote: » So far I've covered: Offer and Acceptance Consideration Formalities Terms Consumer protection (minus EU) Estoppel Misrepresentation Privity Trying to cover Damages, remedies and undue influence in the next oh 4 hours as well.
FE1_2020_ wrote: » Not trying add to your stress, but Im literally speaking from experience here, during the last November exam I left myself very short for revision/prep on EU as I spent the majority of my time on Equity. Anyway, long story short I had about 8 days starting EU from fresh, I left it this late due to the predictability of the topics which many people told me there are certain bankers on the exam. I opened the EU Griffith manual and closed it immediately it was overwhelming, so instead, I literally just honed in on my chosen topics and went through them where they came up on the sample answers, while doing this I cross referenced to ensure they contained the key cases as discussed in the reports for that particular year and each sample answer did in fact have them. Thus, I got peace of mind. I solely revised my notes from them and passed comfortably, my advice is try not to overthink it and stick with the banker topics, such as, JR, DE & MS, Institutions, MEQR's, FMOG & FMOW, Citizenship. Now, if your looking for top marks, the above will not suffice, but if your looking to pass and move on the above definitely allowed me to do that just that.
Iso_123 wrote: » I defo haven't been focusing on sample answers a lot but just got a bit of a shock today when I actually did go and look at one! it was probably about 2 -3000 words long and just had so much irrelevant stuff in it. I think I'll give them a miss from now on anyway. Finding that there's things hes mentioning in his reports that just arnt included in my notes (and I did a prep course) so i'm getting super stressed! EU law is just not it for me lol
Diamond_Hands wrote: » Obviously there's a problem with not covering enough. Equally covering too much is also an issue. There won't be much depth in your answers if you stretch yourself too thin. Likewise, it'll effect your ability to study well in other subjects.
Fe1user5555 wrote: » what have you already covered?
FE1new wrote: » Would it be a mistake to leave out mistake in contract? I don't think my brain can handle anymore. It looks like the whole syllabus is on the papers
Katniss1998 wrote: » Don't focus too much on sample answers. Most of them are very poorly written. You are better off just looking at exam reports, his are generally pretty detailed
FE12020Law wrote: » The Tort syllabus is actually rediculous.
Diamond_Hands wrote: » I don't know if I should add in institutions or competition law?? Only have time for one more!
Iso_123 wrote: » Does anyone else want to pull their hair out after reading any of the griffith sample answers? I looked at ones for EU (which I'm terrified for because I just can't seem to wrap my head around some of the topics) and I honestly am just more confused than before I read it. They are ridiculously long and literally don't even refer to the facts of the question at all except for like 1 line at the end of the answer
flepetch wrote: » that's what i'm covering! hoping to get 2 succession Qs so i won't have to do a family property Q
