13545327 wrote: » Could anyone shed any light on how hard a marker the equity examiner is who had him previously ? I did 2.5 answers to a good standard and the rest of my answers were short however I did fill them with case law but they were mostly just references while not going into that much detail with facts - I missed the Stead case for tracing which is a crucial one and key to the Q
Diamond_Hands wrote: » Will doing: General principles, direct and indirect effect, member state liability, judicial review and preliminary reference, free movement of goods, workers, services, and citizenship cover me, or should I add competition law?
Fe1user5555 wrote: » August 2020
jjjjjop wrote: » Did you just not mention the case or did you not talk about joint tenants/tenants in common? I failed it in november and I had 4 solid answers and only 1 medicore, failed it getting 41, so i personally think he must be tough
13545327 wrote: » No I didn't talk about any of that - I rushed my prep for secret trust and didn't get a fully prepared answer down ! If it was any other paper I still think I would pass but the jury seems to be out on this examiner !
FE1Eire wrote: » Property - I am covering - Adverse possession - Easements - Findings - Family Property - Co-Ownership -Succession - all 3 questions Should this be enough, or should I cover one more? Getting very nervous
AlexTG356 wrote: » What's the marking in property like (with the usual examiner)?
FE1Eire wrote: » I’ve covered exactly the same and institutions are quick to add in!
flepetch wrote: » did anyone who did a prep course get predictions or guidance for tort? feel like there is so much to cover and so little time! i initially thought an essay on statute of limitations was due up but i think damages might be more likely, any thoughts on this?
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » I disagree with saying he’s a very tough marker- he’s actually better than the previous one or at least doesn’t have the same reputation in college for being as tough as the previous one. But that being said he is very particular He does prefer quality over quantity anyway I’ve found !
FE12020Law wrote: » Topics im covering for Tort:Negligence Duty of Care, Standard of Care, Causation, Remoteness, Rylands, Nuisance, Trespass, Defamation, Negligent Mistatement, Nervous Shock, Occupiers Liability, Passing Off, Defective Products, Vicarious Liability, Limiations, Pubic Liability, Animals Liability, Damages.
buckaaabfe1 wrote: » Was he not the external examiner for this sitting? I’m pretty sure it went back to the previous examiner as the internal marker ?
Diamond_Hands wrote: » You might be overextending yourself here.
FE12020Law wrote: » Yeah defininitely. Any reccomendation on what topic to cut?
54321zz wrote: » Eeek I'm covering about half of this!! I'm leaving out Rylands, occupiers' liability, limitations, vicarious liability and public liability
Diamond_Hands wrote: » Occupiers Liability is always good to cover. Nice and easy topic.
flepetch wrote: » that's what i'm covering! hoping to get 2 succession Qs so i won't have to do a family property Q
Iso_123 wrote: » Does anyone else want to pull their hair out after reading any of the griffith sample answers? I looked at ones for EU (which I'm terrified for because I just can't seem to wrap my head around some of the topics) and I honestly am just more confused than before I read it. They are ridiculously long and literally don't even refer to the facts of the question at all except for like 1 line at the end of the answer
Diamond_Hands wrote: » I don't know if I should add in institutions or competition law?? Only have time for one more!
