jjjjjop wrote: » What are the predictions for tort? only starting it now I know the bankers are Demamation and damages... but anything else thats would be good to study ? Also what are peoples thoughts about leaving causation out?
Fe1user5555 wrote: » I would be incredibly surprised if you couldn’t answer 5 questions on the paper with those topics
NewFe1 wrote: » Is it unwise to leave the EU aspect of consumer protection out for contract? I find it a bit of a mess and tough to grasp. I have covered: Offer and Acceptance Mistake Misrepresentation Terms Exemption Clauses Consideration Privity Duress Capacity Undue Influence Estoppel Remedies Discharge Should I be covered with leaving that out?
NewFe1 wrote: » Does anyone think its safe enough to leave frustration out given there was both an essay question and a problem question on it in November?
PostHog wrote: » HI can anyone explain to me the significance of the decision in O'Mahony & Others v Promontoria (GEM) DAC 2020 in relation to offer and acceptance?
cailinbeag00 wrote: » Same. The EU aspect is very complex I find. Cannot get my head around it so taking a chance of leaving it out.
CandyCane_81 wrote: » Quick question, Is there a timer in the exam or do you need to bring a watch?
StabiloLaw wrote: » Hi all, I'm covering Capacity for tomorrow but just want to make sure that I'm not alone in that the bulk of my notes are on minors, and I've very, very little on convicted persons, mental incapacity, intoxication and companies? Really hoping I'm not alone.
caius97 wrote: » For succession, which two questions do people think are due to come up? I'm thinking interpretation of wills and admission of extrinsic evidence, out of legal/formality requirements and spouse/children succession what are people inclined towards?
FE1s2021 wrote: » Contract Offer and Acceptance Consideration Promissory Estoppel Exemption Clauses Consumer Protection Misrepresentation Mistake Remedies Discharge Capacity Illegal Contracts. Should I add in anything else? Are people thinking privity ?
Ignacius wrote: » Can somebody please answer this? I see there are exam papers and reports for March 2020 in company and property but only tort and eu were sat. What is going on? I’m getting all Truman show on it :-)
FE1Eire wrote: » Property - I am covering - Adverse possession - Easements - Findings - Family Property - Co-Ownership -Succession - all 3 questions Should this be enough, or should I cover one more? Getting very nervous
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » All exams bar tort were sat in March 2020
Ignacius wrote: » Cheers! So what was the sitting that only Tort and EU was sat?
13545327 wrote: » Could anyone shed any light on how hard a marker the equity examiner is who had him previously ? I did 2.5 answers to a good standard and the rest of my answers were short however I did fill them with case law but they were mostly just references while not going into that much detail with facts - I missed the Stead case for tracing which is a crucial one and key to the Q
Vegetarian2017 wrote: » Do you mean Re Stead for Secret Trust? Yes unfortunately a very tough marker. I saw some other candidates papers it is shocking how harshly marked the papers were even comparing them to sample answers. I got marked 8 for an answer that was almost a carbon copy of a sample answer i hit all the right caselaw and principles I was so angry and asked for feedback in my scores and still recieved nothing even my score sheet was missing. Honestly I think the equity marking scheme needs to be reviewed after the last sitting so many of us got 43 on the button and we all felt in the same boat the scores made no sense.
