breezy1985 wrote: » Silly child's way of looking at sport. Beating teams in league games and beating them in finals ain't the same
Buer wrote: » OK, let me rephrase it. Vunipola ran towards Aki. Aki then came forward and changed his body position to initiate contact on Vunipola's jaw. Kleyn ran towards Porter and was then tackled by another player. Porter did not change his stance, body height or move forward. Kleyn fell forward and his head collided with Porter's shoulder. The contact was not due to Porter's movement. Kleyn's face would have collided with Porter regardless of what Porter did.
Yeah_Right wrote: » Run into, run at. You're being pedantic. Is the responsibility on the defender to get low? Kleyn ran "at" Porter. Porter went to tackle him, made no effort to lower his height and his shoulder made contact with Kleyn's head. It's a penalty at least. Probably a yellow.
Buer wrote: » Vunipola didn't run into Aki. He ran at Aki who then drove forwards and upwards into Vunipola's jaw. Porter didn't drive forward. The point of contact was initiated by Kleyn.
sydthebeat wrote: » And suffer another 2 months of a completely one sided pro 14 (sic 12) Nah... No thanks At least they had the good grace to put this years league out of its misery early and without excess suffering
Exclamation Marc wrote: » What a weird time to stop watching a game when there's a score in it.
irishbucsfan wrote: » He wraps. He didn't just stand there. The fact he's wrapping is what makes him a tackler. He's responsible for that. I agree it would have been a harsh card, but it was absolutely a penalty.
Buer wrote: » I don't think so. The referee clearly said that the TMO looked at it and that the tackler was passive, Kleyn ran into him. I've watched it back and Porter just stands there. He doesn't change his height, stance etc. Kleyn is tackled by another player and falls into Porter. It would have been an incredibly harsh card. I do wonder why it didn't result in a HIA though given it was clearly a fairly significant head collision.
sebdavis wrote: » Anyone think that Ross Byrne skills are more suited to Munster than Carbery ever will? Byrne would compliment the Munster players better.....
irishbucsfan wrote: » The ref bottled it, it was definitely a high tackle and a penalty at least. I don't think it would have been a red card though.
thomond2006 wrote: » The Rainbow Cup was done primarily for the Springbok players to get tune up games for the Lions series. The SA teams have only been able to play against each other since Covid. The Pro14 unions need the Lions series to be a success.
KH25 wrote: » Am I the only person who isn’t at all enthused by the rainbow cup? I don’t see why we can’t just wait until next season for the pro16.
Clegg wrote: » Also, for as much effort as Farrell and De Allende put in, they really produced very little. They're such a blunt attack instrument that Leinster could read wherever attacks where coming through midfield. Best example when Munster tried an out the back pass to Farrell in the wider channel. Henshaw read if from a mile off and smashed Farrell ten metres behind the gain line. It's hard when you're forwards aren't giving you any sort of attacking platform, but Munster have shelled out a lot to get them into the province and in coached to get the best out of them, but they're getting very little in return.
sydthebeat wrote: » Anyway.. Four in a row, hopefully the inaugural rainbow cup is more competitive, but I fear it will be an Irish final in that as well
Burkie1203 wrote: » Stander made 20 tackles. He had 9 carries for 3m gained. He simply doesn't hurt Leinster with ball in hand. When most of your big moments are on your own try line it tells its own story. POM was largely anonymous. 1 carry in 50 minutes.
sydthebeat wrote: » Munsters "marquee" players were no where today. Dda did nothing, Murray was ineffective, carbery only added to to the blunt stats, pom was ghostly, CJ huffed n puffed. Tight five were very much second place. Conway could have been smoking a cigar for the whole game. Coombes was good, Beirne effected plays when he could. Earls was clever and good when he could be. But most of all, munster aren't cohesive. JVG has run his course, he's not the man to take munster any further. You need a platform to run your plays from and Munster don't have it against the top teams. More semi final disappointment beckons unless they look higher.