bla.bla.b wrote: » I done similar before the last reopening and they cancelled. In fairness it made sense why they did it, that due to 2 balls they needed to restrict people to 2 rounds so as to try best ensure all members could get a round in. There will be no hope of getting the 4 rounds like you there in my club when it reopens week1. And I wouldn't expect it either tbh.
finglashoop wrote: » ive booked for 5th april in my place. and the 7th 9th 11th. no doubt it will be cancelled so the normal crowd can get there times first
etxp wrote: » Im trying to be optimistic but its hard to see golf back on the 5th. We had much less numbers April last year and restrictions were a lot tighter. Hard to see them opening golf until the numbers get down to less than 200 a day. Easter isn't going to help that.
Miley Byrne wrote: » If we are waiting until the numbers get to <200 per day we won't be golfing for a long, long time. 500-600 is the new 100-200. We just have to accept that. We have been in level 5 for how long? 3 full months and the numbers have plateaued at around 500. They ain't gonna go below that number consistently for a good while yet. However the hospital and ICU figures are the ones to watch. They are falling at a consistent rate. There comes a time where people must be allowed live. What we have endured for the last 12 months isn't living. We suffered for as long as we could for the greater good but now that most of the people that were filling the hospital/ICU beds have been vaccinated it is time to give us back our lives. People that are still vulnerable and waiting for a vaccine should still cocoon but they shouldn't expect the vast majority of the population to continue to suffer.
Lad GAGA wrote: » This is spot on and hopefully this is becoming clearer to the government and nphet and things will gradually reopen and golf should be one of the first to reopen in early April.
etxp wrote: » Im trying to be optimistic but its hard to see golf back on the 5th. We had much less numbers April last year and restrictions were a lot tighter.
gypsy79 wrote: » I can tell you hat there is no preference given to anyone
finglashoop wrote: » find that hard to believe to be perfectly honest. some people couldnt even get on chronogolf to work yet same lads manage to get exact same tee time each week when every body is trying to get on at 9am on monday morning
gypsy79 wrote: » Believe it or not. I know it for a fact.
benny79 wrote: » Sure there's a lot of counties that don't even have anybody with covid and the whole county is in lock down. Ridiculous.
copacetic wrote: » A lot of counties with no cases of COVID? Name them?
PabloAndRoy wrote: » I think this is clear to everyone.
Golfhead65 wrote: » Dont walk into these pop up Covid test sites whatever you do as they were set up to bump up the numbers before decisions are made for easing lockdowns, so if you want to go back playing golf avoid at all costd
fungie wrote: » I walked into my local one and got a test. We should've set these things up ages ago.
Golfhead65 wrote: » Were you feeling unwell that you went?? You are the kind of person nphet love for their numbers game, like shooting fish in a barrel
fungie wrote: » No, the whole point is to get asymptomatic cases and the get a picture of the scale of it. This kind of thing is super useful and should of been done a long time ago. Spouting conspiracy theory nonsense and claiming most people are 'fish' is unhelpful, doesn't reflect well on you, making you look like an uneducated, selfish fool. These pop up centres will actually reduce the positivity rate, since more negative tests will be returned, but let's not let reason and science get in the way of your rant.
Golfhead65 wrote: » It's not a rant, would it not be more beneficial to set up these pop ups as vaccination centres but you are probably one who thinks there is no vaccinations to be got!! Look across the water and they had no problem getting them.. Too many false positives for these tests to be accurate. Anyway back to golf
