nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) No trading

Tom Young

This is the new FE1 Exam Thread

This is a link to the old one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055143169

This is a link to the next one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056907164

Sorry, I'm aware we are in the throws of FE1 season, but due to a server issue, a new thread was required. Old chats and posts below - Thanks!

Mod warning in post #1205: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=88514663&postcount=1205

Mod warning in post #2555: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91819622&postcount=2555

Mod warning in post #2593: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=92025688&postcount=2593

Moderator: The above warnings mean it is not ok to buy, sell or swap (trade) any exam materials in this thread. Exam grids are the only exception. You may request and exchange exam grids but at no point will money be allowed to change hands for them.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Katniss1998

mydogwentroof wrote: »

Supreme Court judgment of Hardiman J. in Re Tralee Beef & Lamb + High Court judgment of Barrett J. in Re DLOK Electrical.

I would say the La Moselle criteria is very important too

nmurphy1441

tommytimber wrote: »

Tort

I see a lot of people are covering res ipsa loquiter, did it not come up in August or maybe my grid is wrong?

It did but I’m just covering it because it comes up the same way all the time when it does!!! Handy essay to grasp!

NewFe1

54321zz wrote: »

I think it's been said before but do people have an idea if receivership or examinership is more likely to come up tomorrow? If any. Don't have last paper so can't remember what was up last time. Thanks

I went for receivership but starting to regret that

mydogwentroof

NewFe1 wrote: »

I went for receivership but starting to regret that

Me too but hopefully I'll be covered either way!!!

BBall2015

Fe1user5555 wrote: »

I came to two very wrong conclusions in equity - one on DMC and one on undue influence and ended up with 62% if that brings you any comfort!

Congratulations on passing! I failed equity in Nov so today was the repeat and I'm terrified any little thing will bring me below 50! That definitely gives me hope, thank you!

BBall2015

Iso_123 wrote: »

I came to the wrong conclusion in the secret trusts Q as well I'm 99% sure! I think once you back up your point or just use the right case law you'll still pick up a lot of the marks

I learned secret trusts inside out but completely skipped the "tenants in common" & "Joint tenancy" section so I'm 99.9% sure I gave the wrong outcome. Hopefully you're right and once it's good law it'll give us decent marks to pass!

catonafence

Fe1nov wrote: »

Has anyone sat the Independent college prep course, any thoughts on the predictions for EU? predicted mergers even though was on NOV 2020 paper?

thanks

I the night before video from City stated a guess at an essay style q coming up on ‘agreement, decision, concerted practice’

LeagleEagle747

I know it's a bit late, but anyone any key parts of corporate governance to focus on?

ruby1998

Anyone prepare LTD and DAC and have basically 0 case law?

Mc96

LeagleEagle747 wrote: »

I know it's a bit late, but anyone any key parts of corporate governance to focus on?

The different types of resolutions and informal resolutions - Duomatic case have come up as a question before. It's in meetings under corporate governance in my manual.

StabiloLaw

ruby1998 wrote: »

Anyone prepare LTD and DAC and have basically 0 case law?

I have a sample essay on this drafted up and have 0 cases!

ruby1998

StabiloLaw wrote: »

I have a sample essay on this drafted up and have 0 cases!

Ok thank god!!

StabiloLaw

Is there anything in particular people are concentrating on for Corporate Borrowing?
I'm finding it so hard to retain this information and wondering if I can cut something out.

murray132

Law101 wrote: »

I have tort samples if want them DM me :-)

Can I please get these as well? Thank you

NewFe1

StabiloLaw wrote: »

Is there anything in particular people are concentrating on for Corporate Borrowing?
I'm finding it so hard to retain this information and wondering if I can cut something out.

I've focused on everything to do with fixed/floating charges, fixed charges over book debts and retention of title clauses. Had notes done out on the rest but just don't have the time or headspace to even look at them.

Fe1nov

catonafence wrote: »

I the night before video from City stated a guess at an essay style q coming up on ‘agreement, decision, concerted practice’

Thanks for this .. really starting to doubt myself
I have covered
Free movement of goods
Free movement of workers
Direct effect
Equality
Institutions
Mergers

Any tips or advice would be appreciated if people think this would cover it ?

lawgrad15

TORT

Really important plot twist in the UCC/ESB case - SC ruled that a HC retrial must be heard on certain aspects of the case. Here's a link to a summary: https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/courtandcrime/arid-40251230.html

Judgment is on the courts site.

Good luck

catonafence

Fe1nov wrote: »

Thanks for this .. really starting to doubt myself
I have covered
Free movement of goods
Free movement of workers
Direct effect
Equality
Institutions
Mergers

Any tips or advice would be appreciated if people think this would cover it ?

If you have time make sure you have member state liability to add onto direct effect. It would be good if you have all of general principles or at a push just the fundamental freedoms.

https://citycolleges.ie/night-before-notes-2021/
Watch the Eu video only 27minutes long and worth it.

AA21

What are people focusing on for contract? Does anyone have any sample answers for illegal contracts?

nmurphy1441

Niamh_G wrote: »

For property would it be ok to leave out Easements if I cover findings, Family prop, mortgages, succession, Adversion possession, co-ownership and land reg?

I would say no but it’s entirely up to the person! I just see it as a banker to come up!

mydogwentroof

Seems like Company is either extremely difficult with niche questions or really easy and general. There doesn't seem to be any middle ground?? Heres hoping for a nice one...Best of luck everyone!!

Lallers96

fe1prep2021 wrote: »

Company percentage has well and truly made me dread tomorrows exam

I'm very sorry if that has worried you. I was referring exactly to Company about the sample size. That's in no way a reflection of the usual pass rate for Company based off of a few years old report from the law society. I don't think the data posted for Company is representative of the real pass rate

FE1Nov20

AA21 wrote: »

What are people focusing on for contract? Does anyone have any sample answers for illegal contracts?

So offer and acceptance, consideration, consumer protection, exemption clauses, misrep, remedies, promissory estoppel, discharge, mistake and terms! do you think that's enough?

Sorry i don't have sample answers for illegal contracts i have notes on it but thinking of leaving that topic out now .. will be struggling for time

Ais20

FE1Nov20 wrote: »

So offer and acceptance, consideration, consumer protection, exemption clauses, misrep, remedies, promissory estoppel, discharge, mistake and terms! do you think that's enough?

Sorry i don't have sample answers for illegal contracts i have notes on it but thinking of leaving that topic out now .. will be struggling for time

That’s exactly what I plan on doing!! Hoping it’s enough, have capacity aswell but praying we might get a few nice essay questions&#55357;&#56875;

illy.m

Hi guys really stuck here, I see that a lot of people mention/predict director's loan question? What topic is that?

nmurphy1441

illy.m wrote: »

Hi guys really stuck here, I see that a lot of people mention/predict director's loan question? What topic is that?

S 238 and S 239!

church street 94

Anyone worried about looking away/going through the Companies Act during exam? or is the CA supposed to be in view of the camera?

FE1s2021

If the SLP question is only in relation to subsidiaries and holdings companies - do you just discuss the SEE exception or would you include agency too?

nmurphy1441

church street 94 wrote: »

Anyone worried about looking away/going through the Companies Act during exam? or is the CA supposed to be in view of the camera?

Not worried in the slightest!!! In November, I just showed them my desk at the start and showed them my legislation the first time I picked it up and it was fine!

ruby1998

FE1s2021 wrote: »

If the SLP question is only in relation to subsidiaries and holdings companies - do you just discuss the SEE exception or would you include agency too?

Agency too I believe!