fe1555 wrote: » Would anyone mind sharing what topics they are covering for tort? It is such a big course and I have property on tuesday so trying to balance my time without getting overwhelmed lol Also good luck to anyone sitting company tomorrow, it is a daunting subject but I personally found the examiner to be very fair!
awsah wrote: » dont have sample answers for 2020 but here are the papers
AA247 wrote: » Company Also if somebody could briefly explain conclusion in Cosslett's case please (Smith v Bridgend CoCo 2002). I don't get it, the examiner's case was dismissed but the floating charge was deemed void. How come then the Council weren't required to either pay rent or give the property back to the company in examinership? I seem to be reading these all wrong!
AA247 wrote: » Thanks for replying. Ok sorry still confused. So to cut it short the charge the applicant (Shaws) were looking to register late was created in 2003 or around that (not registered). Frank Bell validly registered a charge in 2013. Shaw's wanted the charge created in 2003 to be registered in priority to Frank's as it was created first and they argued he knew this etc. but court didn't agree to retrospectively register in priority of Frank's, but agreed to register from date of app which was 2014. Correct or not correct?
Smiley283 wrote: » Would anyone be able to share Tort sample answers or even just the past exam papers from 2020? I can trade notes on any exam!
fe1prep2021 wrote: » This might sound silly but does anybody find they have a lot of time to spare with these online exams when I would usually be running out of time during written exams? Or maybe I just don't know enough/am not writing enough... going out of my mind trying to guess did I do enough for each exam Ive sat now
BBall2015 wrote: » Thank you so much, that's so reassuring to hear!! I gave the wrong outcome in the secret trusts q today in Equity and was then worried I'd lose half the marks and it'd bring me way below the 50!
flepetch wrote: » lads losing my head here for corporate borrowings is the case called Re JD Brian Limited or Re JD O'Brien limited? all my notes say different
Mc96 wrote: » In November I sat Equity, Contract and Property (passed them) and finished them all comfortably and felt I had a lot of time to sit and think out my answers. I've never sat a hand written FE1 to compare but in college hand written exams I used to be writing to the last second with barely a chance to think! The extra 30 mins and the fact we're typing gives extra time I've found
Fe1user5555 wrote: » I came to the wrong outcome numerous times in various subjects in November and from looking at my scripts it doesn’t seem like I was deducted any marks!
vkfe1 wrote: » Fingers crossed for you this time - im sure you'll smash it.
StabiloLaw wrote: » Floored me too- If I ever get my paper back with the external examiner's marks, I'll be happy to share the differences between the two! I'm not holding my breath though..
vkfe1 wrote: » I feel pretty comfortable for Company but that has FLOORED me
StabiloLaw wrote: » Just in relation to your worries- I sat Company and got a result of 21% which literally made me fall off my chair. That's what I input into that survey, before I got it rechecked. At the re- check, I was brought up to 45%. No explanation for the difference but I believe there was a number of people in the same boat at the time. If, like me, people put their original scores for Company in there, it might have skewed the results slightly.
Fedone wrote: » Sorry if you don’t want to answer this but did you feel like you’d failed it coming out of the exam? Not feeling too confident going into it tomorrow
StabiloLaw wrote: » No idea about an explanation- I assume I was one of the ones whose paper went missing but they never rang me. I've tried get a copy of both to see the comparisons, but no response.
