StabiloLaw wrote: » Just in relation to your worries- I sat Company and got a result of 21% which literally made me fall off my chair. That's what I input into that survey, before I got it rechecked. At the re- check, I was brought up to 45%. No explanation for the difference but I believe there was a number of people in the same boat at the time. If, like me, people put their original scores for Company in there, it might have skewed the results slightly.
fe1prep2021 wrote: » Company percentage has well and truly made me dread tomorrows exam
Lallers96 wrote: » Yeah equity is the hardest marked usually. Someone did a survey and posted the data here (sample size would be a lot smaller than it actually is):https://www.dropbox.com/s/wmbg4wsawju38a5/Screenshot%202021-01-28%20at%206.40.11%20PM.png?dl=0
FE1Nov20 wrote: » How do people find the contract examiner Is the exam marked harshly ?
BBall2015 wrote: » Just a quick question, from your personal experience, in a problem q, if you use the correct law but come to the wrong conclusion, do you still get decent marks or would they take marks away from not coming to the correct outcome? Thank you!
jjjjjop wrote: » I did the tracing one, said he was able to trace with re hallets estate and also had the option of re oatway. then mentioned the innocent volunteers with the beneficaries being paid and re diplock
bazu wrote: » Poorly, I think? Differentiated between presumed and actual undue influence, and then noted a lot of the commercial banking stuff, but tried to gear it towards the actual question. Cases I referenced - Etridge; Curran; Connolly; Skinner; Smyth; Hogan; O'Brien; Carrol, Fitzgerald, etc. Pointed out legal advice, and change from manifest disadvantage to contemporary stance. Emphasised a lot what was said in Etridge, but ignored the precise husband/wife/bank stuff as I could not find a way to shoehorn it in. Doubt I answered it correctly, but I had prepared for the banking question.
orlaghs wrote: » thanks for replying! im the same i had a coffee and loads of water so was always going to need to go in 3.5 hours lol really have psyched myself out over the day dreaming but you make a good point. no point in worrying i suppose
Iso_123 wrote: » I’m trying not to worry about the toilet but now I’m thinking did I take too long.. I only went once and was probably gone for about 3ish minutes as I had to go to the upstairs one. I am definitely being paranoid now though lol it’s just because out of all my online exams so far this is the first time I’ve went hahah
LoJB wrote: » Equity How did people answer the problem Q on undue influence?
FE1s2021 wrote: » Company - should I be covered with the below topics or is there anything that I need to add? A bit panicked now ! SLP Corporate Capacity - Ultra Vires Directors Corporate Borrowing Examinership Receivership Winding up Realisation of corporate assets Minority protections - Foss v Harbottle Restriction
Vegetarian2017 wrote: » Yes that is correct. Did anybody answer the tracing question? If so, what was the conclusiom Exam 3 answers I am very happy with 4 part A very happy part B a stab of a few lines with bullet points 5 one page of roughwork formed into a last minute essay essay with bullets ran out of time Equity is hard to pass with 5 good questions so unfortunately no matter how good my amswers are theyll still fail me
CMUL wrote: » When do the upcoming exams appear? Mine still isn't up for company?
jjjjjop wrote: » qDid anyone do the quistclose q? I concluded that its an automatic RT and they can get the money.. is this right?
