awsah wrote: » i was thinking that, if I fail there is literally no point in me resitting it ever and I will jsut have to rethink my career choice
Twinings2016 wrote: » How did ppl find the Company examiner's marking?? I feel like the last sitting was a bit harsh?? I am hoping for some sort of miracle tomorrow.. feeling v.unprepared!!
bazu wrote: » Not great. Studied for a decent essay on third parties re undue influence, and focused too much on that. Tried to tie it in - especially re legal advice, but negated the other case law. Prob screwed based on that essay alone. Wanted quia timet injunctions but I could still answer the Mareva stuff, just not as well. Trusts for poverty was a good question, even if it came up with satisfaction/non-charitable-purpose trusts. trusteeship was alright and tracing was fine. Probably failed tho tbh ); You?
jjjjjop wrote: » Well how did we find equity?? Bit thrown with the quistclose q tbh
awsah wrote: » heres the griffith sample answer
bazu wrote: » Also, did anyone else do that undue influence essay? What did you write about? What case law did you cite?
law77335255252 wrote: » Did anybody else not get the exam submitted message? I got it yesterday for Constitutional but just there for equity after I submitted, it just brought me to a blank screen with 'questions.learnosity' or something in the URL bar. equity has gone under the 'exams awaiting feedback' section like constitutional on betterexams website when i checked it just now but this has me worried!
Iso_123 wrote: » No Im panicking now was the undue influence q not a problem question??
bazu wrote: » Oh it was. Ignore that. My brain is just fritzed out.
jjjjjop wrote: » How did people answer the secret trusts q ?
Iso_123 wrote: » This exam was also the first one that I left the room to go to the toilet and I awkwardly said to the camera 'i am just going to the toilet' and walked out really slowly and awkardly hahaha now im panicking that they're going to bring it up as suspicious activity
lawDani wrote: » Haha omg this is me too with ‘I’m just eating my banana’ and all! To be honest I’ve been reciting my answers out load too I’m sure they hear it all and it would only be flagged if absent a long time or frequently I’d say
lawDani wrote: » First time sitting equity there. Defiantly only answered about three questions good id say. Is the paper marked hard in comparison to others? And has anybody passed ever only answering four ? Haha Heya October
stonewash wrote: » When I was doing the exam I got sent out to the lobby twice because I touched the mouse pad thing (it’s very sensitive on my laptop), is this ok? Did that happen to anyone in November?
stav wrote: » This happened to me 5+ times too today because of my mousepad!!! It stressed me out so much, not quite sure what to do lmao. Did your time keep running?
Iso_123 wrote: » I talked about the communication cases - prendiville, blackwell, re boyes and then I used the rule in Re Stead because he only communicated to one of the trustees. I basically said in the end that because his words in the will make it clear that he intended communication to all of the trustees and he failed to do that William holds his interest on resulting trust and Michael takes beneficially BUT don't take this as the correct answer because i genuienly dont know if it is or not. Didn't really like this q
