jjjjjop wrote: » Well how did we find equity?? Bit thrown with the quistclose q tbh
Lallers96 wrote: » Eoin O'something, can't remember tbh my brain is fried
nmurphy1441 wrote: » PM me your email, I have some bits you want!
Lallers96 wrote: » Well that was the nicest paper yet. Loads of old questions that have come up exactly word for word in previous sittings!
vkfe1 wrote: » When in doubt, blame the examiner!
Fe10000 wrote: » Would anyone mind sharing a sample answer with me please - on minority shareholder oppression, such as Oct 2019 q. 4 Unsure of what to say for the second part that is usually asked - part (b) would your answer be different if constitution or shareholders agreement contained a provision...
bobbyness wrote: » Seems to be a regular occurrence in my life. Guess I'm just deluded about my own capabilities, or in denial. One or the other XD
vkfe1 wrote: » A girl i work with - she's a qualified solicitor now, she said that she was convinced she failed Cons. and passed Tort but it was the other away around. She was barely able to answer the questions and waffled. She was home by the time the exam was over. I wouldn't worry - usually be able to answer 5 questions, no matter how ****e, is a good indicator. Positive thoughts!!!!
vkfe1 wrote: » That's equally as upsetting though! Haha!
bobbyness wrote: » Completely concur. The ones I've thought was 100% failed are the ones I've passed. The ones I've thought are 100% passed I've failed.
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Does anyone have any constitutional Miracle stories where they were sure they failed and ended up passing? I wrote 4 grand answers and one horrrific one and would love to hear something hopeful hahah
LeagleEagle747 wrote: » Sorry to be a pain but does anyone have an up to date Company grid they don't mind sharing or the 2020 topics from both sittings? I only have up to October 2019. I've other stuff I can swap if needed!
Mc96 wrote: » Have you covered unfair terms in consumer protection? I know exclusion clauses came up in November but she often throws them in with questions on offer and acceptance/consumer protection so I think you might be better to have a quick look over exclusion than estoppel or mistake.
fe1fi20 wrote: » thanks
LeagleEagle747 wrote: » Personally no, nothing whatsoever, nothing popped up, the screen didn't change, the thing didn't shut down or anything. And I never heard anything about it afterwards either and got in the high 60s, so I dunno how this system works anymore lol