Treehelpplease wrote: » probably the camden quay stuff. here and skyscrapercity seems to get news a lot more before the papers these days when it comes to developments
Deleted User wrote: » https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-40250306.html
RTE wrote: The green light for the €140m development at Custom House Quay in Cork City centre was given today subject to 23 conditions. The 23 conditions include the appointment of a conservation expert to manage, monitor and implement works on the site, the provision of 20 car parking spaces, a detailed log of the existing buildings' historic features be lodged with the Irish Architectural Archives, and an archaeological appraisal of the site is carried out. The developer will also be required to submit detailed plans on traffic and waste management during construction, as well as submitting further details on the planned maritime-themed visitor centre, and the operation of the pontoon on Custom House Quay. Financial contributions will also have to be paid to Cork City Council in respect of public infrastructure and facilities benefiting development in the area, and towards road improvement works in the vicinity before the development can go ahead.
Irish Times wrote: It is understood the hotel will be run by Marriott International, which made a submission to Cork City Council planners backing the project and who run a 31-storey hotel in redeveloped industrial area Long Island City, New York which was built by Times Square Construction, the contracting division of Mr O’Sullivan’s business.
marno21 wrote: » Indeed. But they are a useful tactic to objectors as a delaying process even if they prove to be unsuccessful. Not sure if the crew here would be financially able for a job like this though
MikeOxsgreen wrote: » Hopefully Judicial reviews are of the process, not the decision, plaintiffs would have to be able to show where the process was flawed.
marno21 wrote: » It can be taken to judicial review, but the costs of such are prohibitive in most cases (usually touching six figures minimum The fact that ABP effectively rubber stamped it is a great sign. Normally judicial reviews are taken when ABP are the lone approver (such as the M28 or strategic housing developments). Different gravy altogether when there’s 2 approvers. The EIS for this is more than 1000 pages. Tower Holdings put Herculean work into getting this right. Fingers crossed they get moving on this and explore options for similar stunning infills.
Cork Lass wrote: » Between that and the large expansion of Penneys, there should be a lot of jobs coming on board in Cork. Great news.
ACitizenErased wrote: » Fantastic news this morning. Time to turn Cork into a 21st century city.
Treehelpplease wrote: » prism construction started last march but was halted because of the coronavirus
Deleted User wrote: » I wouldn't blame them in the least, regarding Prism. Economies of scale here, much cheaper to get deliveries/equipment/staff etc running parallel I imagine
SleetAndSnow wrote: » Can this be stopped any other way now that the appeal has given permission? Or can certain people take it to the courts, which wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
namloc1980 wrote: » Great stuff. Probably will be some time before this starts. Tower Holdings have done very little in relation to the Prism building as of yet.
timmyjimmy wrote: » Penneys? FFS. I'd rather spend money on quality than buy something that you'll have to throw out in few weeks.
marno21 wrote: » Cork is now the only city in Ireland with national roads criss crossing in the city centre. The only detrunking of note was the N71 from the N40 to Victoria Cross. Once the North Ring & M20 are done, the N20, N8 and N22 will likely be detrunked. Not sure where that leaves the N27