Iconic10 wrote: » what year is this question?
FEONE wrote: » The Oireachtas has enacted the Protection of Waterways Act 2020, The Long Title of the Act states that it is “An Act to address the problem of over fishing in Irish rivers and to preserve the natural resources of the State in its fish stocks, Section 2 of the Act allows the Minister for the Environment to make a river Cessation Order, Such an Order “has the effect of prohibiting all fishing on the designated river for a minimum of 10 years or such longer period as the Order may prescribe, Section 11 provides that a breach of such an Order is a criminal offence. Can anyone tell me please is this asking about the executive power or legislative power with regards to proportionality?
Coopie wrote: » Constitutional Does anyone have a summary of the case A/I/S v min for justice and equality 2020 IRC’s 70?
Iconic10 wrote: » am i right in saying that almost every problem question deals with locus standi ?
Lallers96 wrote: » How did everyone find Criminal? I answered 5 but found it awful tight for time...I really hate those multiple part questions they end up being double the work of other Qs. My own fault for starting one and getting flummoxed by the 3rd part (man who fell during work and died due to defective machine).
lawgrad2020 wrote: » For Equity, can someone clarify if Campus Oil principles need to be applied in a problem Q for QT injunctions? I understand a plaintiff must prove a substantial risk of danger before a court will grant a qt but my manual and notes are conflicting on whether Campus Oil needs to be applied as well. I would be so grateful if someone can clear this up for me!
Fe1user5555 wrote: » What was q1 on criminal?
Dropin wrote: » Not entirely sure, I presumed there was a defence of Mistake in there but I didn't hang around to find out. Can't say I was too impressed with the CAB question either.
bigchungus wrote: » I found it alright until it logged me out midway through!! was so freaked. I did: Q1 - necessity and self-defence Q2 - Vehicular manslaughter, criminal and dangerous act, and gross negligence Q5(i think?) - attempted rape, consent and the other offences can't remember the numbers of the other two but the characterisation of crimes one and then right to silence/bail Isn't he an alright marker for criminal anyway?
BookFast wrote: » What in the name of God was that CAB question
Fe1Hopeful91 wrote: » Hey folks. Can I just ask what you did when it logged you out? Like does it just log you out of the whole BE website or just the exam? Did you ring LS or just log back in? And (last question) does your time pause when your logged out or do you just lose that time?
bigchungus wrote: » I freaked out for 30 seconds then it brought me back to the very start of the BE process - had to show ID, do the smile thing. Incredibly frustrating and the first time it didn't work, aswell, but after that I didn't have any trouble. I rang the LS after just to explain it to them and they said they had tonnes of people ringing them about it
ruby1998 wrote: » I think (hope) it was classification of a crime and the Gillian v CAB case I said it wasn’t criminal in nature and they would not be entitled to 38.1 or A6 echr safeguards in the investigation
