KathleenGrant wrote: » I know there are more important discussions ongoing here but how do I send score for Space Invaders? There is no option for attachments in a PM?
Trigger wrote: » But you made it out as if that was the only post i had in relation to the Babs & Steve going on, as if they were the only ones in the convo at the time and i just popped in to say that post, that is totally incorrect and taken out of the context, i had numerous other posts at the time that were all in the context of that conversation, even the line, there was nothing about staying neutral in that, or being on the fence especially if you read it in the context of the rest of my posts at the time.
KathleenGrant wrote: » There are new players here who were asked if interested in a backroom. Katie may have no role at all.
Abigail WW wrote: » Why them? If you had to vote for someone NOW who would you vote for and why?
Abigail WW wrote: » Who'd get your vote in the vote was in 5 mins time?
Abigail WW wrote: » If you have to vote now, who would you vote for and why?
Abigail WW wrote: » Careful bolding stuff, you'll irk folk.
Trigger wrote: » Upload it to Imgur and then You can use [ img][/img ] tags with the link to the picture inside those or id say you could use [ url][/url ] ^take out the spaces
Necro wrote: » I literally said it irked me, I didn't make anyone who posted it part of my suspicions. Why are you saying I'm doing this when in fact I clearly state exactly that?
Necro wrote: » The do not post in bold stuff irked me a little earlier, need to go back and read that 2 hour period again after work. Like I get it, trying to sort things for Will but posting in bold telling others not to just seems against the spirit of the game, if you know what I mean?
Necro wrote: » I prefer to think it's a slip by a roled player - could be either good or bad Sure we're trying to find the baddies, so do you suggest we just ignore potentially finding, in your own words - a baddie?
Conor WW wrote: » Gun to head, you. My question was to liz, about calling babs a chosen one. Seems like you are tying to start arguments. Not really tree rusting stuff, just wanting folks to name other people. But i don't have gun to head. Do you have no questions to me other than who i want to accuse, on day one?
Trigger wrote: » Yeah its all good, the plan is still in place either way, you are now part of it. Its still working out so no worries at all
Barbara WW wrote: » Trigger, why are you letting someone off with deliberate anti village play and not reading the thread
Trigger wrote: » Because if you think rationally about it, its really not an anti village play, wolves will also want to find the Demo. And there is no way in hell that the Demo would make that move themselves. We have seen it time and time again that posters post on the thread when day one starts and then go back and read Day 0.
Barbara WW wrote: » I get that people post once and then go back and read, but I think deliberately posting again after being told not to is definitely anti village.
Trigger wrote: » Look, Steve made his initial post, which i believe was just the usual drop post for presence on day 1 post, then he didnt post again until there was numerous other posts that stated that he was in the group. It happens, we adjusted so its all good and the plan is still intact. If he had dropped a post after everyone had already posted at say 11.59 or so, it would look a bit off. Anyways, I'm sure he can defend himself. so i'll bow out of it.
Necro wrote: » I can only go with my gut Abi and given the lack of input from Katie in well... anything since making that post my gut says bad at the moment.
Necro wrote: » There's that option of course. Thing is, Katie hasn't been on to explain since. So how do we resolve it without their input?
Jake WW wrote: » Thanks guys. Entry submitted. Now to find me a wolf!
Eva WW wrote: »
Abigail WW wrote: » What questions would you prefer me to ask? You wanna try those questions with me?
Abigail WW wrote: » To go further, I wanna see who people will accuse.... will it may amount to nothing, later in the game the info may be useful. Information is power young Conor.
Wendy WW wrote: » There is something not sitting right for me with this. Why is someone, who may or may not be evil, in your good books Abi?
Conor WW wrote: » Sure, but you first.
Trigger wrote: » First post is to Steve Thats the context of that post, there is nothing self aware about it.
Necro wrote: » That's because that specific line was what stood out to me. The argument back and forth segwayed into it but I just found that line in particular interesting, as I said a bit too self-aware.
