Also Starring LeVar Burton wrote: » Don't we all know it... :pac:
Necro wrote: » You seem to want to draw me into a huge back and forth, I'm not taking the bait Abi.
Trigger wrote: » Thats about Katie's backroom*
Necro wrote: » Babs and Steve get into it over Steve posting without permission etc It's a decent back and forth, both putting across their points. I have a semi-decent vibe off it, doesn't feel wolfy on either's part. This on the other hand.... The fact Trigs needs to points this out suggests he may be concerned to remain on a nice neutral fence. There's a... sort of... self awareness about the post that doesn't really come off as villagery.
Abigail WW wrote: » Or, ..... to put it another way,..... you have no comeback. But ok, we shall park it there. Whats your most logical conclusion to Katies post, RE backroom?
Abigail WW wrote: » I think we need to park the bus on the Demi/Will talk for now, unless Will comes out to tell us he found Demi. We need to figure out who leaves tonight. Jake for me is in my good books (doesn't mean he is not evil), but hes not a Demi for my money. Right now Id vote Necro.
Trigger wrote: » Well you see thats pretty selective just posting one of my posts from that time as if thats the only post i made. I had numerous posts within that discussion, as did Brendan i think. i had put my point across a few times, called out by Babs which i clarified and then posted that. I wasnt on a nuetral fence, I pointed out that Barbara was wrong to Jump on Steve for that and I still agree with that. So I'll ask this question, why do Barbs and Steve get afforded the luxury of you reading all of there posts and making a decision on them, but only one of my posts from numerous, is taken out of the context of the conversation for you to make your Lean?
Wendy WW wrote: One of mine was taken out of context too, just haven't had a chance to go back and look - but did feel slightly misrepresented.
Wendy WW wrote: » FIONA PLEASE READ THE THREAD AND DON'T POST BEFORE 12.
Necro wrote: » As I said, I was a bit irked about that mainly cos I find it against the spirit of the game. That's all really, don't find it suspicious or anything like Abi wants to twist things. More on her later.
Necro wrote: » I don't know what you want lol, you're admitting you can see how I was referring to playing the video game :pac: I think a ballsy wolf would have no issue making that post. As we can see, loads of people are dismissing it out of hand as being a wolfy action as 'there's no way a wolf would do that
Abigail WW wrote: » I can see it now, but what I cant see how you like to twist my words, something you accuse me of doing. What would a ballsy wolf have to gain by posting as such? I prefer to think its a slip by a roled player., could be either good or bad.
Wendy WW wrote: » It is unfortunately against the spirit of the game, but why say that now after the fact given you were posting yesterday and this morning prior to this. Why raise it as a negative after the fact? It was a plan to try surface Demi - what was your plan? How do you think it could have gone better?
Necro wrote: » The do not post in bold stuff irked me a little earlier, need to go back and read that 2 hour period again after work. Like I get it, trying to sort things for Will but posting in bold telling others not to just seems against the spirit of the game, if you know what I mean?
Necro wrote: » I got switched out to include Babs
JP Liz V1 wrote: » Is Babs the special chosen one
Abigail WW wrote: » I can see it now, but what I cant see how you like to twist my words, something you accuse me of doing. What would a ballsy wolf have to gain by posting as such?I prefer to think its a slip by a roled player., could be either good or bad.
Conor WW wrote: » Can you explain what 'the special chosen one' is about?
Necro wrote: » It was the wording of the final line that interested me, not the rest of it tbh.
Necro wrote: » Why do this? It's like your Jake post earlier, it's really hedgy.
Abigail WW wrote: » See this is my issue , all active players were aware of it, its a plan to catch a wolf. I see no issue with it. Even if you have issue with it, it hardly makes the person who posted in bold suspect.
Abigail WW wrote: » Why do what? Please explain?
Abigail WW wrote: » Why them? If you had to vote for someone NOW who would you vote for and why?
KathleenGrant wrote: » I know there are more important discussions ongoing here but how do I send score for Space Invaders? There is no option for attachments in a PM?
