Werewolf: Stranger Things

He would still have to do over 2 seperate days as he only gets one check a per day (2 checks), and we have no way of knowing if the timeslot for the day 0 will count. better off just to keep doing what we have been doing

Brendan WW wrote: »

Sorry, I know we said we'd park the thing about Will's powers but I just realised something...

If you're reading Will... I think we might be able to settle it now

If you can choose your two time slots retrospectively, and 22:33-00:33 counts as yesterday then we have:

22:33-00:33

10:00-12:00

So...
Yes-Yes means Fiona, Angus, Wendy or Liz (4)
Yes-No means Jake, Kathleen, ASLB, Necro, Conor (5)
No-Yes means me, Steve, Trigger, Barbara (4)
No-No means Abigail, Clodagh, Eva, Katie (4)

Yeah that works, wonder if they were able to use an action last night is only thing I'd be wondering.

KathleenGrant

Brendan WW wrote: »

Sorry, I know we said we'd park the thing about Will's powers but I just realised something...

If you're reading Will... I think we might be able to settle it now

If you can choose your two time slots retrospectively, and 22:33-00:33 counts as yesterday then we have:

22:33-00:33

10:00-12:00

So...
Yes-Yes means Fiona, Angus, Wendy or Liz (4)
Yes-No means Jake, Kathleen, ASLB, Necro, Conor (5)
No-Yes means me, Steve, Trigger, Barbara (4)
No-No means Abigail, Clodagh, Eva, Katie (4)

That's well worked out Brendan, well done

Sorry, I know we said we'd park the thing about Will's powers but I just realised something...

If you're reading Will... I think we might be able to settle it now

If you can choose your two time slots retrospectively, and 22:33-00:33 counts as yesterday then we have:

22:33-00:33

Conor WW wrote: »

21 March 2021, 22:33 - 00:33 has 9 people in it

22:33
fiona
angus
jake
kathleengrant
wendy
levar
necro
jpliz
conor
00:33

Will, if you are allowed to use that window, feel free to verify it yourself.

10:00-12:00

Brendan WW wrote: »

Yes - phase one worked

So if Will checks 10-12 and the Demi Lovato is present, it has to be one of:
me, Angus, Steve, Trigger, Barbara, Wendy, Liz, Fiona

So...
Yes-Yes means Fiona, Angus, Wendy or Liz (4)
Yes-No means Jake, Kathleen, ASLB, Necro, Conor (5)
No-Yes means me, Steve, Trigger, Barbara (4)
No-No means Abigail, Clodagh, Eva, Katie (4)

JP Liz V1

Wendy WW wrote: »

I just got a call, and have been offered a new role I interviewed for last week Posting here as I know some of my team know who I am on boards, and I hadn't told anyone I had the interview. Not a promotion, just a move out of the toxic work environment I am currently in.

I thought at first this was werewolf related

Congratulations whomever player you are

Conor WW wrote: »

if the format remains the same, which i believe it should, then tomorrows window should be between 11&13 or even later, as you can game without posting, but everybody should be allowed choose the game.

12 and 2 maybe? If it's a similar challenge tomorrow gives non posting peeps a chance to play the game so they don't have to sit there like lemons and not contribute

Conor WW

Eva WW wrote: »

Some of us weren't allowed pick :mad::mad::(:(:(

if the format remains the same, which i believe it should, then tomorrows window should be between 11&13 or even later, as you can game without posting, but everybody should be allowed choose the game.

Ok, re-read done. Couple of things stood out.

Katie WW wrote: »

I can't sign in.

For obvious reasons. I can think of one ballsy player that would do this as a wolf, so I'm not discounting it as an obvious village play either - mainly cos it's not villagery at all.

Next thing of note was Angus - they really didn't want Babs on the list, I don't get the hysterics at all!

Angus WW wrote: »

I managed to go to sleep early. Big deal. Stop deflecting. Last night I put myself on a list and today I'm putting myself on a list.

The real question is why are you eager to get Barbara, a non-entity so far, on the list?

Pushing on Jake about mentioning Babs for said list, use of deflecting - Angus ain't a happy camper here!

Angus WW wrote: »

Actually a better idea: someone else besides Barbara or me.

So neither Angus or Barbara on the list.

Angus WW wrote: »

Actually I'll go on the list if you want. Just no Barbara on the list.

Angus WW wrote: »

One thing looks suss:

Jake trying to shoehorn Barbara onto the list.

One thing might look suss to others:

Me eager to get on the list.

So I will go on the list if people want me to or stay off if people want me to.

I propose that Barbara should not be on the list.

All these posts are similar, Angus really doesn't want Babs on the list - why does it matter? It's an arbitrary list of 9 names, it makes no difference who is on it or not really.

Fast forward a little bit.

Brendan WW wrote: »

Necro and Wendy posted the same list. Let's just settle there

One question - should we delay it slightly?
Flavour munch and details of the games are at 10, would we like everyone to be able to react?
Maybe make it 10:15 to 12:15

Villagery from Bren, like this post a lot - consideration for reactions to actions. Something I forgot myself, the 10 to 12 is tough because if someone needs to react to info etc and there's people screaming DON'T POST like the two folks here do...

Wendy WW wrote: »

FIONA PLEASE READ THE THREAD AND DON'T POST BEFORE 12.

Angus WW wrote: »

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO POST IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY POSTED BETWEEN 10AM THIS MORNING AND NOW

As I said, I was a bit irked about that mainly cos I find it against the spirit of the game. That's all really, don't find it suspicious or anything like Abi wants to twist things. More on her later.

Babs and Steve get into it over Steve posting without permission etc

Steve WW wrote: »

Listen here, do you understand your own plan?

Once I posted there was nothing that could be done so posting after it is irrelevant, I'm in the pot now. It's time based not quantity based so your group is intact.

This kind of shrill OMG behavior is no use to anyone, and I'm not gonna let you try and tar me as anti village.

Barbara WW wrote: »

would hardly call it OMG behaviour - that's dramatic, just because you don't like what I'm saying.

I would also like to point out that we don't know exactly how Will's power works. We don't know if he has to pick a two hour period before it happens, or if he has the option to pick any exact 2 hour time period at any stage.

It also isn't my plan. I wasn't active yesterday and had zero input into the creation of the plan.

It's a decent back and forth, both putting across their points. I have a semi-decent vibe off it, doesn't feel wolfy on either's part.

This on the other hand....

Trigger wrote: »

Look, Steve made his initial post, which i believe was just the usual drop post for presence on day 1 post, then he didnt post again until there was numerous other posts that stated that he was in the group. It happens, we adjusted so its all good and the plan is still intact. If he had dropped a post after everyone had already posted at say 11.59 or so, it would look a bit off.

Anyways, I'm sure he can defend himself. so i'll bow out of it.

The fact Trigs needs to points this out suggests he may be concerned to remain on a nice neutral fence. There's a... sort of... self awareness about the post that doesn't really come off as villagery.

Abigail WW wrote: »

I think we need to park the bus on the Demi/Will talk for now, unless Will comes out to tell us he found Demi.

We need to figure out who leaves tonight.

Jake for me is in my good books (doesn't mean he is not evil), but hes not a Demi for my money.

Right now Id vote Necro.

And finally this point - kinda comes out of nowhere and still makes no sense to me.

It's clumsily worded at best - Jake is in my good books (doesn't mean he's not evil)

Better phrasing would be, I don't think Jake is Demi Lovato.

Again I have a thing about phrasing and it just seems a bit too self aware, at pains to point out they don't think Jake is evil (but yet could still be evil).

Their switch to me is meh, whatever - I'm used to being suspected so it's not a big deal, though I still maintain they're clutching at very finely tuned straws for their reasoning.

I think I'd be going

Katie
Trigger
Abigail

As my #FFA1 for now, but there's loads of time to lynch yet and I haven't cast a vote yet. Again, day 1 and all that so it's gut really.

Katie's post definitely the wolfiest post thus far.

Thats about Katie's backroom*

Abigail WW wrote: »

If you have to vote now, who would you vote for and why?

Angus, for the absolute hissy fit they threw about not being included in the list, even though they had requested to be taken out initially.

I really want to hear a bit from both Fiona & Katie though, both low posters, i know others have said they cant see a wolf making that mistake, but can they see a RV do that either? the answer would be no, i would definitely wait until after munch anyways before looking at her as a lynch target more

Abigail WW

Trigger wrote: »

Fire away, i'll be here to answer any questions you have.

If you have to vote now, who would you vote for and why?

Steve WW wrote: »

Katie and her backroom are my main interest, but of course, backroom doesn't mean baddie by default. She's made herself a munch target more than a lynch one I would say.

Voting is going to be tricky. I have a good lean on Abigail and Barbs because of their open accusations against other players. I feel day 1 tree shaking is villagey.

I want to look closer at Trigger later. Seems very helpful but too every man for my liking. Just a feeling at this stage though.

Fire away, i'll be here to answer any questions you have.

Eva WW wrote: »

Perhaps, I don't know if I'd say being careful is what all wolves will do though, or even be able to do.

Maybe not - it just makes me second guess anything suspicious I see...

Steve WW wrote: »

Katie and her backroom are my main interest, but of course, backroom doesn't mean baddie by default. She's made herself a munch target more than a lynch one I would say.

Voting is going to be tricky. I have a good lean on Abigail and Barbs because of their open accusations against other players. I feel day 1 tree shaking is villagey.

I want to look closer at Trigger later. Seems very helpful but too every man for my liking. Just a feeling at this stage though.

...for example, I agree and I definitely want to hear from Katie about the backroom, but my gut tells me that would be a crazy mistake for a wolf to make.

Steve WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

What are your thoughts Steve? You seemed the earliest to start (correctly) trying to get us focused, guessing you've thought about it too

And to preempt you asking me... I don't know

I can't see any reason for someone to mess up the morning plan if they're village or wolf, and I feel like the Demi would think it too obvious a move to disrupt it. That means I'm discounting Angus getting annoyed by the list, Steve popping up at 10 in error, and Fiona popping up after she'd been removed. Not saying any of them are good, but I don't think they're reasons enough to say bad

Basically it's day 1, it's shooting fish in a barrel full of good apples, right?
I feel like our evil players are likely playing carefully today so anything I'd instinctively jump on, I kind of dismiss, which leaves me blank

I would like to hear more from the very low posters. Incidentally, is there a way on boards to see a collated postcount? I'm sure I've seen it before

Katie and her backroom are my main interest, but of course, backroom doesn't mean baddie by default. She's made herself a munch target more than a lynch one I would say.

Voting is going to be tricky. I have a good lean on Abigail and Barbs because of their open accusations against other players. I feel day 1 tree shaking is villagey.

I want to look closer at Trigger later. Seems very helpful but too every man for my liking. Just a feeling at this stage though.

Eva WW wrote: »

I don't care that much about the choice of game Trig. Unless we see that one of the people who chose wins the prize, and later that one of the people choosing the game were also a wolf then I'd be suspicious.

I chose Space Invaders, but tbf, i didnt, and im sure plenty of others too, didnt realise that we were actually going to be playing the game itself, i personally thought it was going to be some sort of forum game behind that name. Hindsight is a great thing to lose your way with, if you read it in real time when the post was made at 12, I and others were surprised with the link

Eva WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

I meant more not giving any reason to be jumped on.
For example, Angus going off on one earlier drew attention to himself, I presume an evil player wouldn't do that

Perhaps, I don't know if I'd say being careful is what all wolves will do though, or even be able to do.

Also Starring LeVar Burton

Congrats Wendy. Ok I'm gonna re-read the thread now, will keep an eye on real time too

Eva WW

Trigger wrote: »

TBF we didnt know that it was going to be a first to 3 choice that had to be made during the period that was being used, those details were only made available at 10.

We could hold an open vote later maybe and hope one of the 3 that were available today are available again tomorrow. And then get 3 of the posters who will be posting during the time tomorrow to throw the votes out?

I don't care that much about the choice of game Trig. Unless we see that one of the people who chose wins the prize, and later that one of the people choosing the game were also a wolf then I'd be suspicious.

Wendy WW wrote: »

I just got a call, and have been offered a new role I interviewed for last week Posting here as I know some of my team know who I am on boards, and I hadn't told anyone I had the interview. Not a promotion, just a move out of the toxic work environment I am currently in.

Congrats.

There's nothing quite like that new job/change in work enviromment feeling, especially if you've been in any way unhappy in your current position.

Eva WW wrote: »

Playing carefully, as in not jumping on anything???

I meant more not giving any reason to be jumped on.
For example, Angus going off on one earlier drew attention to himself, I presume an evil player wouldn't do that

Eva WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

What are your thoughts Steve? You seemed the earliest to start (correctly) trying to get us focused, guessing you've thought about it too

And to preempt you asking me... I don't know

I can't see any reason for someone to mess up the morning plan if they're village or wolf, and I feel like the Demi would think it too obvious a move to disrupt it. That means I'm discounting Angus getting annoyed by the list, Steve popping up at 10 in error, and Fiona popping up after she'd been removed. Not saying any of them are good, but I don't think they're reasons enough to say bad

Basically it's day 1, it's shooting fish in a barrel full of good apples, right?
I feel like our evil players are likely playing carefully today so anything I'd instinctively jump on, I kind of dismiss, which leaves me blank

I would like to hear more from the very low posters. Incidentally, is there a way on boards to see a collated postcount? I'm sure I've seen it before

Playing carefully, as in not jumping on anything???

Barbara WW wrote: »

can't do it on touch site mobile. on the regular site, click into the werewolf forum and on he right hand side it tells you how mnay posts are made in each thread. Click on the number for this thread and it'll give you a pop box showing what Abigail just posted.

sorry that should say Wendy, not Abigail.

Brendan WW wrote: »

Great, thanks. How do you do that? Just to save me asking each time I want to check

can't do it on touch site mobile. on the regular site, click into the werewolf forum and on he right hand side it tells you how mnay posts are made in each thread. Click on the number for this thread and it'll give you a pop box showing what Abigail just posted.

Wendy WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Great, thanks. How do you do that? Just to save me asking each time I want to check

I only know how to do it on desktop - on the WW forum main page, click on the number of posts. This will open a new window with a table of the number of posts per user.

Brendan WW wrote: »

Some of your team know your WW identity?

Congrats, sounds like great news

I was also quite impressed with that, cool teammates that you can share your WW love with them

Congrast Wendy, sounds like a great move.

Trigger wrote: »

TBF we didnt know that it was going to be a first to 3 choice that had to be made during the period that was being used, those details were only made available at 10.

We could hold an open vote later maybe and hope one of the 3 that were available today are available again tomorrow. And then get 3 of the posters who will be posting during the time tomorrow to throw the votes out?

I'd be assuming the same choices will be made available tomorrow, minus space invaders and we'll play them all over the course of the week.

Wendy WW wrote: »

User Name Posts
Angus WW 48
JP Liz V1 46
Trigger 46
Wendy WW 43
Brendan WW 43
Jake WW 37
Necro 35
Barbara WW 25
Conor WW 19
Also Starring LeVar Burton 16
Steve WW 13
KathleenGrant 9
Abigail WW 7
Eva WW 6
Fiona WW 3
Katie WW 1

Great, thanks. How do you do that? Just to save me asking each time I want to check

Wendy WW wrote: »

I just got a call, and have been offered a new role I interviewed for last week Posting here as I know some of my team know who I am on boards, and I hadn't told anyone I had the interview. Not a promotion, just a move out of the toxic work environment I am currently in.

Some of your team know your WW identity?

Congrats, sounds like great news