Irish Praetorian wrote: » I really think people over-estimate the likelihood of a majority vote in the North for a United Ireland - the 'Catholic' portion of the population is lingering around the 45% mark, whilst although the 'Protestant' proportion is declining and ageing much faster, there is an increasing cohort of 'neither'. This new 'neither' cohort is far more likely to be convinced by more secular and pragmatic arguments about their future, and such pragmatism would probably lead them to stay in the UK. Even the process of Brexit has not stirred things up dramatically.
thomil wrote: » And to be frank, this debate should also encompass potentially throwing out Republican or traditional Irish symbolism and heraldry altogether, or even the current political system of the Republic as a whole, if that's what's needed to make reunification work.
frosty123 wrote: » Persuade the unionists?? Well I suppose we can start by stop bombing & killing them, especially those living along the border...but voting for the political wing of the terror group hell bent on ethnic cleansing them isn't going to help matters.
cameramonkey wrote: » 28 counties ? What are the other 2 counties ?
Del2005 wrote: » If the vote is to join an Ireland with a different flag, different national anthem and with each province becoming a federal state( the only viable solution to incorporate NI) that's not the Ireland they have been dreaming to join for generations. So not voting to join The Federal Union of Ireland, they want to join the Republic of Ireland , makes them unionist? The nationalists will hold out till they sing Amhrán na bhFiann on their whole island Republic of Ireland under their Green White and Orange flag.
Rawr wrote: » We could do a whole advert campaign to win over Unionists...kind of like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNQVLtqOcrc Just change the end: "The Republic of Ireland, We've made a few...changes..."
mehico wrote: » Conversations around a united Ireland often become polarised and folk from strong Unionist backgrounds are unlikely to be persuaded of the benefits of a UI but there is a large middle ground now in NI that will potentially hold the balance in any future border polls and this is the section of population that needs to be pursuaded either way.
Larbre34 wrote: » I wouldn't try to persuade them. Their perception is totally and absolutely correct. Fact is, they have been let down, even betrayed by their own representatives for decades now. Their time is over and thats all there is to it. We don't need them to agree to a United Ireland, 6 million to 0.8 million is a pretty easy bit of arithmetic understand. They can either remain where they are and live exactly as they always have, albeit electing to a Dublin parliament, or they can piss off to GB. Either way, the momentum is unstoppable now, UI is leaving the station and building up steam.
Del2005 wrote: » Why do you assume that a united Ireland vote will be carried in the Republic? It'll take a lot of persuasion to get people to give up their flag and national anthem to take on the basket case propped up by public service jobs.
Deleted User wrote: » 1922 to 1969 was effectively this....it essentially ended in civil war?....it would go same again,gowls talking about a federal/devolved stormont are blinded to history and facts,to a worrying degree Il agree to disagree....imo its only viable option going forward
[Deleted User] wrote: » An independent Northern Ireland separate from the Republic and Britain is the only viable option. Unification with the Republic would be a disaster for the Republic. The North would drag us down economically, and socially. There are simply too many problems continuing to exist there, and there isn't the will by them to resolve them. They're not going to accept Dublin telling them what to do, and that will increase the problems for everyone. The only reason I can see from these kind of threads is the ideal/dream of a united Ireland... a tugging of heartstrings, devoid of practical consideration for what would happen thereafter.
bilbot79 wrote: » The answer is to give every single unionist' in the north a 50k relocation bonus to move to the UK. The British and Irish governments split the bill. Everybody wins.
Deleted User wrote: » its time to fix their mess once and for all here)
[Deleted User] wrote: » Throughout that period, it was not independent. You've proposed nothing to show that the mess will be fixed, nor a realistic time-frame during which the Republic will have to suffer through it. Economically, and socially, the North is a mess... and I've seen nothing here to suggest that the Republic could change that without crippling our own economy, even if we don't take into account the wide range of divisions within Northern societies, and the hatreds/agendas that continue to exist. You keep repeating the idea of unification without dealing with the problems associated, simply because nothing else will "work"... and zero realistic estimation that unification would "work"
Orange Tiny Terror wrote: » Option 3, Northern Ireland grows up and becomes an independent country and stops screaming like a petulant child for what it wants from Dublin or London.
Deleted User wrote: » Catholics likely outnumber protestant already in nihttps://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/2020/12/northern-ireland-census.aspx Unionism is being let down by its leaders in shouting down any debate as regards a unity poll.....they will be vastly under prepared come what may as regards it,and have no card remaining to play.... they tried so hard to get a hard border to cut nationlists off from the south/strengten partition and when push come to serve,the british government fcuked em over......no amount of lies,will detract from fact,the ni protocol is a result of dup policy surronding brexit