fe12020grad wrote: » Does anyone know if you can use a laptop with a Bluetooth key board and mouse for the online exams? Did anyone use them during the last set out exams and have any hassle? Just a little worried it will be flagged for looking down too much.
DUMSURFER wrote: » Does anyone have an up-to-date criminal grid and an exam paper/report from November? Can swap anything and everything that anyone needs!
murray132 wrote: » Did anybody notice that the NBN 2021 for Tort were outdated. He spoke about vicarious liability coming up as it hadn’t been up since October 2018, when in fact it came up on the last two papers ?
Al1501 wrote: » For tort I'm doing Duty of care Standard of Care Causation Negligence Nervous Shock Professional Negligence Public Authority Liability Employers Liability Vicarious Liabilty Defective products Defamation Trespass to person Nuisance Passing off Does anyone have suggestions for what to leave out/put in?
DUMSURFER wrote: » Please, does anyone have up-to-date criminal gird or the recent paper. Still looking and desperate beyond belief!
nicolesd wrote: » can anyone explain the case and the main significance of the friends of the environment v board pleanala for constitutional law ?
flepetch wrote: » is there any reason you're covering public authority liability? i have it crossed off in my mind just going off the grid i have lol and defective products came up in november as an essay so i think i'll only cover it lightly i've prepared an essay on the statute of limitations and i'm also going to have a look at liability for animals and fire as it could be one of the random infrequent topics that gets thrown! NBN lecture said that concurrent wrongdoing and pure economic loss could be due a run over passing off as well
FE1new wrote: » I think that was posted a few pages back by awash around 185 or 186 if that helps.
murray132 wrote: » I really think defamation is due a run and possibly negligent misstatement for economic loss. I’m going to cover what you’ve there except professional negligence comes up as med neg 90% of the time and came up like that in Nov! I’ve covered N.S, but it came up as a problem Q in August so I doubt it’ll show again. I think an essay on res ipsa locquiter might be due up, as it hasn’t been up in two papers and that seems to be the trend with it !
DUMSURFER wrote: » Hey, thanks for replying but I have already gone back and checked and the grid that was posted only goes up to Spring 2019 and the exam paper was from March 2020, not the November 2020 Criminal paper
Al1501 wrote: » Thanks for this. I've just checked my grid against the November paper and it's catastrophically wrong
KingofTheFE1s wrote: » https://www.algoodbody.com/insights-publications/friends-of-the-irish-environment-v-an-bord-pleanala Found that helpful. Bit late in the day to be trawling through judgements.
bluerthanu wrote: » FYI, I think there may be a bit of confusion about the case being referred to here. As far as I know (please correct me if I’m wrong) the case that’s important for constitutional law is Friends of the Irish Environment v Government of Ireland etc (which was a SC decision handed down last summer). Friends of the Irish Environment v An Bord Pleanala is a case concerning planning law of some kind (I think). This case also happened to be handed down early last year by the SC. I think the CC NBN confuses the two. It’s the former case, not the latter, that is important for constitutional law issues.
WesternC123 wrote: » Can someone please tell me what topic this relates to?
murray132 wrote: » This is the grid I’m going off
FE1Nov20 wrote: » I have Friends of the Irish Environment v An Bord Pleanala in notes for right to bodily integrity - brief line stating that right to an environment consistent with human dignity or right to healthy environment is impressible vague and does not bring matters beyond the right to bodily integrity
FE1s2021 wrote: » Are people covering constructive trusts for equity?
