k mac wrote: » Did not think a GLAS inspection would be looking at fences... i thought they would be inspecting measures you were required to carry out e.g. bird boxes, sand for bees, wild bird cover etc.
feartuath wrote: » Got on ok, native trees did not grow so well so some of these have to be replaced. Lots of records to be submitted.
TooOldBoots wrote: » Strange that they carried out a Glas inspection in the middle of the Covid lock down. I thought they were all on hold until after.
TooOldBoots wrote: » Nothing essential about them. Glas is running over 5 years now, inspectors coming out checking for Bird boxes at this stage in the middle of a pandemic is a complete slap in the face to people. From reading the article in the independent it looks like these Dept folk are behaving as if they are above the law. Disgraceful behavior, the law should be applied to them even more so since they are employed by the state. Can't see any reason for it delaying payments, covid-19 isn't the farmers fault.
MIKEKC wrote: » You make a point of saying they're checking bird boxes. There is a lot more to these inspections. A bigger disgrace is that people are flouting the rules and getting paid every year. I personally know several people that haven't obeyed the rules since the scheme started yet get paid . Now they are extending their contracts and will continue to get paid no doubt. It is very easy to maintain social distancing at an inspection .The inspector has the maps and con work on his own.
TooOldBoots wrote: » No, we are in the middle of a pandemic. These inspections are not as important as peoples health and safety. So what if one of your neighbor's hasn't put up the birdbox, get off your high horse and get over it. If it's anything else it can be inspected using satellite, the tax payer is already paying for it so let them use that for now. There's more to the lockdown then just social distancing, if that was all that was needed then why have movements restricted, Schools, Churches, drapery, hairdressers funerals etc have all been stopped.
MIKEKC wrote: » This did not happen in the majority of cases.
Deleted User wrote: » Some statement, where's your evidence for making it?
MIKEKC wrote: » Why do you say it's some statement?. I live beside and farm the commonage , so know everyone who has it stocked.
Deleted User wrote: » You're claiming the majority of commonage farmers are acting fraudulently. You should either back that up with evidence, or withdraw it.
MIKEKC wrote: » A condition of the scheme for people with commonage is to stock the commonage. This did not happen in the majority of cases.
Birdnuts wrote: » In fairness a chap inspecting a field of WBC is hardly a major risk compared to visiting a shop or having kids in school - all of which are currently allowed
TooOldBoots wrote: » Again we are in the middle of a pandemic. Checking WBC or some checking out some complaint made by a jealous neighbor on his high horse about commonage are not essential during a pandemic. Peoples heath and safety are more important. The same risk is there, you have someone who is not from an area traveling to other areas doing work that is not necessary, whats worse is the total randomness of the areas visited. Btw less than a third of the Children in Ireland are not allowed to go to School with over a year now. No its just a case of these public sector jobs were for some unknown reason deemed necessary so they stay on full pay plus allowances. That's the crux of it.
Dinzee Conlee wrote: » I would imagine they would stay on full pay regardless they call out or not, given they are civil servants? Allowances may be affected, not sure how much these are though? Had an inspection for something small last week. He was here and gone in 20 mins probably. If I wasn’t inspected I wouldn’t have been able to move forward with my plan, so a quick inspection suited me...
TooOldBoots wrote: » It's ok for one to make have Pandemic measures when it suits so. This is a great society we have. What about all the people who are out of work/ not allowed to work. There plans don't matter.
893bet wrote: » No one said the other people don’t matter? A unilateral approach was never possible. You are pushing at an entirely different agenda rather than GLAS inspections.
Grueller wrote: » That is the quote that you were picked up on Mike. You did say the majority of cases did not comply with stocking commonage.
Had an inspection here last week and just got letter out today requesting documents such as the Glas record books, receipts for WBC, Bee Sand, Slurry Spreading etc. Also some fertiliser and meal receipts.
All of the above is fine as in fairness I followed the plan fairly well.
The only thing requested I'm unsure of that he is looking for is: "Completed and signed Nitrates Records"
Does any know where I can find a form for Nitrates Records or any advice for filling it out ?
I didn't see any requirement for Nitrates Records in any of the schemes T&C's or am I wrong ?
TIA
Is that the deceleration on the very last page of the record book that you have to sign twice yearly after you review you nmp. They don't appear in the 2021 or 2022 record book.
https://www.gov.ie/en/form/1a1a9-glas1-2020-record-sheets-pdf-2568kb/
I'm not sure if that's it as he appears to be looking for this 'Nitrates Records' separate to the yearly record books that he has also requested.
Just hope I don't have to get the planner involved to complete it as that will be more money :(
would your annual slurry declaration form or the carbon navigator cover it. I know the carbon navigator is associated with bdgp. Did you apply for derrogation at any time?
You can print off the nitrates generated from your herd numbers on the agfood site.